Re: [Asrg] Re: Why SPF?

["Roger B.A. Klorese" <rogerk at queernet.org>]

Alan DeKok wrote:

> rogerk at queernet.org wrote:
>
> > My position is that no one else should be able to impose such
> > restrictions on their users without the users' awareness and
> > informed consent.
>
>
>   Which is what I called "mutual consent".  I agree with that position.
>
>   The difficulty I have is that the rest of your posts appear to be
> saying that you don't want anyone to be presented with those restrictions.

I'm saying that *new* users should be presented with them, and existing 
users with the *option* of living under them, and only with real 
informed consent, not the "click 'accept' after ignoring these three 
pages of terms and conditions" nonsense we see today.

No ISP or system administrator has yet explained any blocking effort 
I've seen with a clear assessment of the circumstances under which a 
user might fail to receive mail they want to (such as their ISP not 
liking the extent to which the sending ISP does or does not participate 
in their blocking cabal, or the reasl likelihood of false positives in 
their spam filters).

There is lots of so-called consent out there... but in the mass IDP 
marketplace, at least, it's all of the "swallow this, it's good for you" 
variety.

_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg