RE: [Asrg] Anti-spam laws do work, FYI. There's proof.

[Barry Shein <bzs at world.std.com>]

On August 2, 2004 at 20:14 pbaker at verisign.com (Hallam-Baker, Phillip) wrote:
 > >  > I don't see how you get from A to B unless there is a large 
 > >  > number of commercial parties paying for delivery of the type of
 > >  > email you are objecting to and to achieve that you already have
 > >  > to be at point B.
 > > 
 > > As I said they can most likely use that excuse once.
 > 
 > You can claim that the party is aware of the claim you are making.
 > I don't see how you get to the belief that the alledged 
 > contract claim is enforceable. If you start losing cases
 > this would tend to reinforce the idea that the clause
 > is not enforceable.
 > 

The approach I foresee is aggressive blocking of anyone who won't pay
soas to put the shoe on the other foot.

The net is changing, the current model has failed.


-- 
        -Barry Shein

Software Tool & Die    | bzs at TheWorld.com           | http://www.TheWorld.com
Purveyors to the Trade | Voice: 617-739-0202        | Login: 617-739-WRLD
The World              | Public Access Internet     | Since 1989     *oo*

_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg