RE: [Asrg] ISP rules to be enforced by UK regulator

["Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker at verisign.com>]

I disagree with the model here.

The traditional model under common law is that a party has an
obligation to mitigate harm caused to others if the probability
of the damage multiplied by the cost of the damage is greater
than the cost of taking steps to prevent the harm.

What we need here is to start looking for reasonable estimates 
of the damage caused by zombies.


I don't agree with (3). Complaints from unauthenticated sources
are not something that can be dealt with. If by response you
simply mean reply then I don't see how it helps.

I completely disagree with (4), anything that makes it harder
to terminate spammers is counterproductive.


> Here is my list of rules.
> 
> 1. ISPs must ensure rapid isolation of zombie machines
> 2. ISPs must perform filtering or a reasonable alternative
>    to ensure that IP spoofing is not possible
> 3. ISPs must have a rapid response to complaints about spam
>    sent to abuse at isp.com
> 4. ISPs must charge a fee to users who are terminated due
>    to spamming-related activities
> 

_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg