On 2005-05-08 18:39:57 +0000, gep2 at terabites.com wrote: > >>>> This document effectively says that all users are to send their email by > > relaying it through their ISP SUBMIT service (not only home but also while > > traveling) rather then make attempts to do it directly. > > >> Or they can use port 587 to submit to external services. That's what I > > remember reading > > > Correct. External services that made prior arrangement with user for using > such a service, i.e. its an xSP (ISP/ASP/MSP..) service. > > > That is effectively the same thing as ISP email service, we just separate > meaning of email service being provided by ISP into email receiving service > and email sending service and specify that both may involve separate > independent arrangements and separate providers. I suspect that in 99% > of cases its still going to be the same provider, but its good to provide > for possibility of alternative just in case. > > That's completely, hopelessly impractical if a user is traveling and has no > control over the originating path of their outgoing E-mail. Nonsense. draft-hutzler-spamops-04 doesn't touch that possibility at all. hp -- _ | Peter J. Holzer | Weil wir die materielle Welt nicht so |_|_) | Sysadmin WSR | wahrnehmen, wie sie ist, sind Sachen wie | | | hjp at hjp.at | JPEG, MP3 usw. möglich. __/ | http://www.hjp.at/ | -- Heiko Schlenker in drsm.
Attachment:
pgpgdQn91ygZu.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Asrg mailing list Asrg at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg