[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Asrg] Re: New draft of the DNSBL definition document

To: asrg at ietf.org
Subject: [Asrg] Re: New draft of the DNSBL definition document
From: Frank Ellermann <nobody at xyzzy.claranet.de>
Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2005 01:03:41 +0200
List-archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/asrg>
List-help: <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:asrg@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: <URL:http://purl.net/xyzzy>
References: <Pine.BSI.4.56.0510280213430.28733@xuxa.iecc.com> <Pine.WNT.4.63.0510281528140.496@jvc> <Pine.BSI.4.56.0510281534100.1926@tom.iecc.com>
Sender: asrg-bounces at ietf.org

John R Levine wrote:

> I haven't looked at enough name-based DNSBLs to know.

For the five RFCI zones it's example.tld

SURBL had a better idea (because it also lists IPs):
just use 2.0.0.127 as test entry also for RHSBLs.

I don't know any other RHSBL.  Bye, Frank



_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg

References:
- [Asrg] New draft of the DNSBL definition document
  - From: John R Levine
- [Asrg] Re: New draft of the DNSBL definition document
  - From: John R Levine

Prev by Date: Re: [Asrg] Re: New draft of the DNSBL definition document
Next by Date: [Asrg] Proposed fix for 127.0.0.1 (was: New draft of the DNSBL definition document)
Previous by thread: Re: [Asrg] Re: New draft of the DNSBL definition document
Next by thread: [Asrg] Another draft of the DNSxL document
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread