[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Asrg] Re: Bots

To: asrg at ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Asrg] Re: Bots
From: Seth Breidbart <sethb at panix.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 17:07:12 -0500 (EST)
In-reply-to: <041101c61ba6$686e7bb0$0d00005a@moregarlic.com> (larry@larryseltzer.com)
List-archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/asrg>
List-help: <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:asrg@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <041101c61ba6$686e7bb0$0d00005a@moregarlic.com>
Sender: asrg-bounces at ietf.org

"Larry Seltzer" <larry at larryseltzer.com> wrote:

> It's not a solution for the DDOS problem, but it definitely would
> make a massive dent in the spam problem (or at least force spammers
> into some other tactic; of course you'll tell us what that would be,
> right?)

Well, no.  Why give them any leads?

Seth

_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg

References:
- RE: [Asrg] Re: Bots
  - From: Larry Seltzer

Prev by Date: Re: [Asrg] Re: Bots
Next by Date: [Asrg] Re: Bots
Previous by thread: RE: [Asrg] Re: Bots
Next by thread: [Asrg] Re: Bots
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread