[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Asrg] Email service assumptions and making system-wide changes

To: asrg at ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Asrg] Email service assumptions and making system-wide changes
From: Seth Breidbart <sethb at panix.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 13:27:34 -0500 (EST)
In-reply-to: <OFFE10648F.FD8AB2E7-ON802570FA.0035C93C-802570FA.0035EABB@slc.co.uk> (message from Danny Angus on Wed, 18 Jan 2006 09:48:55 +0000)
List-archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/asrg>
List-help: <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:asrg@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <OFFE10648F.FD8AB2E7-ON802570FA.0035C93C-802570FA.0035EABB@slc.co.uk>
Sender: asrg-bounces at ietf.org

Danny Angus <Danny_Angus at slc.co.uk> wrote:

> A truly effective solution to the real problem would not *require*
> that open relays be closed, it would involve a transaction between
> the sender and the recipient, not impose a constraint on the
> transport layer.

YM "FUSSP"

Seth

_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg

References:
- Re: [Asrg] Email service assumptions and making system-wide changes
  - From: Danny Angus

Prev by Date: Re: [Asrg] Spam, why is it still a problem?
Next by Date: Re: [Asrg] Spam, why is it still a problem?
Previous by thread: Re: [Asrg] Email service assumptions and making system-wide changes
Next by thread: Re: [Asrg] Email service assumptions and making system-wide changes
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread