<x-flowed>In message <20060118175425.39732.qmail at simone.iecc.com>, John Levine <asrg at johnlevine.com> writes>Sender ALLOW Remove sender from Allow list -->>VU=bCnsahfkMSAuP8lpCMGeUQhttps://www.vqme.com/pk/eh?op=remove_from_allow&From=asrg%2Dbounces at ietf .org&VU=bCnsahfkMSAuP8lpCMGeUQ Block sender -->
https://www.vqme.com/pk/eh?op=block_sender&From=asrg%2Dbounces at ietf.org&
>>>Nowhere that I know of. So we all thank you for offering to do allthis important work.
The point is that if this is important enough why is it not a funded position?
Um, who do you think should be funding it?
It's not about who should be funding it but simply that it is important enough that it should be funded.
Cart before horse.
>As I presume you know, the entire IRTF is run by volunteers. The ASRGbudget is $0.
Therein lies the problem. Perhaps some sponsorship would make things move more quickly?
Alternatively working with other independent bodies that are funded would provide indirect support, such as http://www.opengroup.org/
http://www.eff.org/
These organisations get funding. Why can't this one?
Which organisation is it exactly that you are speaking of?
_______________________________________________ Asrg mailing list Asrg at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg