Re: [Asrg] Spam, why is it still a problem?

[Dave Crocker <dhc at dcrocker.net>]

John Levine wrote:
> > IMHO any "IFUSSP" solution would probably need to meet the following
> > requirements..
>
> This is a nice list.  Any chance you could work it up into a draft of
> proposed criteria for anti-spam techniques?

I like the list, too. It has promise as a vehicle for constructive discussion 
about proposals.

Perhaps the most difficult aspect of trying to flesh the list out is to provide 
solid explanations that clarify and justify each of these "requirements". 
Barry's response highlights this.

For example, the "no cost" requirements prompted his observing that there is 
always cost.  He's right, but I suspect your"no cost" reference was not meant as 
an absolute.  Or perhaps it was, at least, meant to mean that there was no 
third-party fee.  Or perhaps it meant...

Hence the need for elaborations.

d/
--

Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
<http://bbiw.net>

_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg