[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Asrg] Supplemental addresses (was: Indirection as a useful tool)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
william(at)elan.net wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Feb 2006, Dave Crocker wrote:
>> oh boy.
>> Mailbox NAT.
>> So much for end-to-end.
> This isn't something new at all as you probably know. And sendmail has
> had email address rewriting and masquerading rulesets for years...
Yes. And we've been doing email address rewriting for over a decade
(internal versus external forms. Internally, my email address isn't
clewis at nortel.com).
But... Before you do such a thing, consider what it does to S/Mime etc
(breaks it), and consider what you do with internal names that leak.
Multiplying your spam-cross-sectional-area Etc.
It's a hideous mess, and we're still paying for it.
Ick.
It's almost as bad as stealing someone else's IP space for your internal
(BIG!) network, and then trying to use a non-NATting firewall to the
Internet. [Fortunately, we didn't fall for that trap. An /8 is a big
thing to renumber.]
- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3-nr1 (Windows 2000)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iQCVAwUBQ+j/sJ3FmCyJjHfhAQLadQP9H9HlbQsXM/hC/2jsIZhl6TVgUMno3i5i
g4dWWKPtexka9Qx/Fz1dXn1aY5qmDUYPJ9T0ruAnOPD/k51ncfoaVZFzHnBWekha
7t8kahWRUWF8oWOgQA+Jkuxn62xO/xz6aN3ebkRTkjLNJMXkmcuhKPkeZxObk53i
5cJEH14F3dc=
=lf8m
- -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3-nr1 (Windows 2000)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iQCVAwUBQ+kYv53FmCyJjHfhAQIIYgQA8EUl83xEZkiKf324krqQTVHihVwLi02U
FCyW/23xroUXt77o0pMPru4+kXGu0HIvLFth1OxzHmAoo9KYz6RjiIHIQNGJyi12
gW+j1dCEDksSw9tTSURvOEhyGyg+QczpR5V7Lo+m3HAQzOsJ6xtVJZhM/s9L9Fbd
BYvyymz9X08=
=gNan
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg