Re: [Asrg] Re: bounces, and anit-spam principles

[Dave Crocker <dhc at dcrocker.net>]

Tony Finch wrote:
> <gep2 at terabites.com> wrote:
> > 2.  Accordingly, the definition of what they do and do not
> > want MUST be such that the RECIPIENT defines it... not the
> > IETF, not the sender's ISP, not the recipient's ISP, nor
> > some governmental body, nor anybody else.
>
> Most users prefer to delegate this job. It's 10x more efficient
> to do so.


Not to quibble, but I would have guessed several orders of magnitude greater.

Probably more.

Also, for most of the world's 1+ billion users, I'd have added "effective" to 
"efficient"...

d/

--

  Dave Crocker
  Brandenburg InternetWorking
  bbiw.net

_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg