Re: [Asrg] Re: per recipient status

["Eric A. Hall" <ehall at ehsco.com>]

On 1/24/2007 1:10 PM, Claus Assmann wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 23, 2007, Eric A. Hall wrote:
> 
>> see http://www.ehsco.com/misc/I-Ds/draft-hall-inline-dsn-01.txt which uses
>> per-recipient codes after the data block (the LMTP model)
> 
> Are there any intention to make this into an RFC?

I didn't push it (the writeup was a thought experiment more than
anything), and there didn't seem to be a lot of interest from the WG
either. I imagine somebody would need to implement it in their MTA before
it advanced down the standardization track.

>> It's not likely that spammers would use it however
> 
> For those you can still use the method of allowing only one recipient
> per transaction (or at least only recipients with the same anti-spam
> policies). Any conforming MTA however would not be subject to those
> restrictions.

all true

-- 
Eric A. Hall                                        http://www.ehsco.com/
Internet Core Protocols          http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/coreprot/

_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg