Re: [Asrg] New draft draft-irtf-asrg-bcp-blacklists-01.txt

["Al Iverson" <aiversonlists at spamresource.com>]

On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 2:36 PM, Douglas Otis <dotis at mail-abuse.org> wrote:

>  Some BL policies do not adhere to the dubious philosophy expressed in
>  section 2.2.1  and  2.2.3.

Could you elaborate upon the relevancy of that fact? I'm not seeing
why it matters.

>  2.2.1.  Listings SHOULD Be Temporary
>
>  2.2.3.  Removals SHOULD Be Prompt
>
>  Automatic de-listing can be highly counter productive in controlling
>  IP address ranges previously producing substantial levels of abuse.
>  Requiring owners of an address range to request de-listing establishes
>  points of contact to better deal with likely events of future abuse.

I think these should stand as is. I think they cover "it's not
suitable to remove your IP address at this time" eventualities just
fine.

Regards,
Al Iverson

-- 
Al Iverson on Spam and Deliverability, see http://www.spamresource.com
News, stats, info, and commentary on blacklists: http://www.dnsbl.com
My personal website: http://www.aliverson.com -- Chicago, IL, USA
Remove "lists" from my email address to reach me faster and directly.
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg