[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Asrg] New draft draft-irtf-asrg-bcp-blacklists-01.txt



On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 10:12 AM, Matt Sergeant
<msergeant at messagelabs.com> wrote:
> On 29-Mar-08, at 5:46 AM, Peter J. Holzer wrote:
>  >> So, RBL(tm) listings get listed until the problem is fixed, and the
>  >> responsible party contacts the blacklisting provider.
>  >
>  > If this is the criterion, all you have to do to conform to 2.2.1 is
>  > check your mailbox every 6 months. If nobody has reported that the
>  > problem is fixed, the criterion still applies and you can extend the
>  > listing for another 6 months. (of course the BCP contains other
>  > recommendations, too)
>
>  Thank you - that's exactly what I was thinking.
>
>  Doug: does this make sense to you? This is in full compliance.

This seems like full compliance to me, as well.

Al


-- 
Al Iverson on Spam and Deliverability, see http://www.spamresource.com
News, stats, info, and commentary on blacklists: http://www.dnsbl.com
My personal website: http://www.aliverson.com -- Chicago, IL, USA
Remove "lists" from my email address to reach me faster and directly.
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg