[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Asrg] Round 2 of the DNSBL BCP - "collateral damage"

To: "Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF" <asrg at ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Asrg] Round 2 of the DNSBL BCP - "collateral damage"
From: "J D Falk" <jdfalk at returnpath.net>
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 19:46:51 -0400
Delivered-to: ietfarch-asrg-web-archive at core3.amsl.com
Delivered-to: asrg at core3.amsl.com
In-reply-to: <47F418BA.4020505 at nortel.com>
List-archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/asrg>
List-help: <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:asrg@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <47F26BB7.9000307 at nortel.com><20080401234203.GA28036 at gsp.org><20080401234915.GB28036 at gsp.org><7d6a0cac0804011758n4a52692du75354a1a865ed48d at mail.gmail.com><20080402020943.GA11788 at gsp.org><63EED2AF-9C4B-41E9-A1E1-251175DBB462 at blighty.com><47F31DCA.6010001 at sorbs.net><585B4458-AFD8-42FA-992D-E0314BE8CCC1 at blighty.com><20080402134936.CD9D9241F4 at panix5.panix.com><92ABE0EA-1D7E-4222-B02C-03E043AB932D at blighty.com><7d6a0cac0804020928q44548f5ft36714b107cc11157 at mail.gmail.com><B161B2C1-41D2-4CDD-8427-8C7D02ED5914 at blighty.com><3B5E0B6321289441AAB5419A6F7B6B52C5F922 at rpnyex01.rpcorp.local><47F3CFB2.2070808 at nortel.com> <47F3D3AD.1050003 at FahQ2.com><200804022245.SAA22494 at Sparkle.Rodents.Montreal.QC.CA> <47F418BA.4020505 at nortel.com>
Reply-to: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg at ietf.org>
Sender: asrg-bounces at ietf.org
Thread-index: AciVGl9oVhHXa99oTBy5qX5wdPf0dAAAQeXA
Thread-topic: [Asrg] Round 2 of the DNSBL BCP - "collateral damage"

Chris Lewis thought:

> der Mouse wrote:
 [ . . . ]
>> Might I suggest DNSL, then, instead of DNSBL?
>  That, is one of the thoughts I had.

This is a Best Current Practices document, and thus we've already been
through arguments about intorducing new practices that aren't currently
in widespread use.  Shouldn't we similarly avoid introducing new /words/
that aren't currently in widespread use?
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Asrg] Round 2 of the DNSBL BCP - "collateral damage"
  - From: Larry M. Smith
- Re: [Asrg] Round 2 of the DNSBL BCP - "collateral damage"
  - From: Matthew Sullivan

References:
- [Asrg] Round 2 of the DNSBL BCP
  - From: Chris Lewis
- Re: [Asrg] Round 2 of the DNSBL BCP
  - From: Rich Kulawiec
- Re: [Asrg] Round 2 of the DNSBL BCP - "collateral damage"
  - From: Rich Kulawiec
- Re: [Asrg] Round 2 of the DNSBL BCP - "collateral damage"
  - From: Al Iverson
- Re: [Asrg] Round 2 of the DNSBL BCP - "collateral damage"
  - From: Rich Kulawiec
- Re: [Asrg] Round 2 of the DNSBL BCP - "collateral damage"
  - From: Steve Atkins
- Re: [Asrg] Round 2 of the DNSBL BCP - "collateral damage"
  - From: Matthew Sullivan
- Re: [Asrg] Round 2 of the DNSBL BCP - "collateral damage"
  - From: Steve Atkins
- Re: [Asrg] Round 2 of the DNSBL BCP - "collateral damage"
  - From: Seth
- Re: [Asrg] Round 2 of the DNSBL BCP - "collateral damage"
  - From: Steve Atkins
- Re: [Asrg] Round 2 of the DNSBL BCP - "collateral damage"
  - From: Al Iverson
- Re: [Asrg] Round 2 of the DNSBL BCP - "collateral damage"
  - From: Steve Atkins
- Re: [Asrg] Round 2 of the DNSBL BCP - "collateral damage"
  - From: J D Falk
- Re: [Asrg] Round 2 of the DNSBL BCP - "collateral damage"
  - From: Chris Lewis
- Re: [Asrg] Round 2 of the DNSBL BCP - "collateral damage"
  - From: Larry M. Smith
- Re: [Asrg] Round 2 of the DNSBL BCP - "collateral damage"
  - From: der Mouse
- Re: [Asrg] Round 2 of the DNSBL BCP - "collateral damage"
  - From: Chris Lewis

Prev by Date: Re: [Asrg] Round 2 of the DNSBL BCP - "collateral damage"
Next by Date: Re: [Asrg] Procedural (was: Round 2 of the DNSBL BCP)
Previous by thread: Re: [Asrg] Round 2 of the DNSBL BCP - "collateral damage"
Next by thread: Re: [Asrg] Round 2 of the DNSBL BCP - "collateral damage"
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread