Re: [Asrg] Round 2 of the DNSBL BCP

[Matthew Sullivan <matthew at sorbs.net>]

Bart Schaefer wrote:
> On Apr 3, 12:06pm, Rich Kulawiec wrote:
> }
> } We're not discussing third-party intervention here: we're talking
> } about people exercising control over their own resources.
>
> We're *not* talking about that:  we're talking about a third party
> who provides advice about what control to exercise over resources.
> That third party has the power to intervene; the only difference is
> who gave said power to the third party.  The consequence to at least
> one, if not both, of the other two parties, is indistinguishable when
> that power is asserted, no matter where the power came from.
>   

Not quite - the owner of the resource has the right to deny access, the 
entity viewing has the right not to look/use.  The transit providers 
(unless contracts say otherwise) have the right to deny transit.  A 
unrelated, unauthorised party like the Pakistani ISP does not have the 
right to deny access.  A BL is given the right to deny access by the  BL 
user.

/ Mat
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg