[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Asrg] Round 2 of the DNSBL BCP - "collateral damage"

To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg at ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Asrg] Round 2 of the DNSBL BCP - "collateral damage"
From: Rich Kulawiec <rsk at gsp.org>
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 09:14:29 -0400
Delivered-to: ietfarch-asrg-web-archive at core3.amsl.com
Delivered-to: asrg at core3.amsl.com
In-reply-to: <47F58B40.8090500 at sorbs.net>
List-archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/asrg>
List-help: <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:asrg@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <20080403150008.60559.qmail at simone.iecc.com> <47F4FF7D.4070002 at nortel.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20080403093331.03077fb8 at resistor.net> <47F509C5.9050006 at nortel.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20080403095528.02ef80e0 at resistor.net> <934f64a20804031026n75f5ab5bq42533a2473988374 at mail.gmail.com> <20080404012506.GA28653 at gsp.org> <47F58B40.8090500 at sorbs.net>
Reply-to: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg at ietf.org>
Sender: asrg-bounces at ietf.org
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.15+20070412 (2007-04-11)

On Fri, Apr 04, 2008 at 12:58:24PM +1100, Matthew Sullivan wrote:
> Seems a lot of people forgot what SPF gives/does not give.

I'm well aware of SPF (and DKIM, and SenderID).  Whatever their
theoretical merits, I don't consider them worthy of serious operational
consideration, as spammers/phishers already have the ability to render
them moot whenever it pleases them to do so.  But regardless of that
debate, which is arguably off-topic here, I don't believe they should
be mentioned in a BCP about DNSBLs.

---Rsk
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Asrg] Round 2 of the DNSBL BCP - "collateral damage"
  - From: Matthew Sullivan
- Re: [Asrg] Round 2 of the DNSBL BCP - "collateral damage"
  - From: Seth
- Re: [Asrg] Round 2 of the DNSBL BCP - "collateral damage"
  - From: Chris Lewis

References:
- Re: [Asrg] Round 2 of the DNSBL BCP - "collateral damage"
  - From: John Levine
- Re: [Asrg] Round 2 of the DNSBL BCP - "collateral damage"
  - From: Chris Lewis
- Re: [Asrg] Round 2 of the DNSBL BCP - "collateral damage"
  - From: SM
- Re: [Asrg] Round 2 of the DNSBL BCP - "collateral damage"
  - From: Chris Lewis
- Re: [Asrg] Round 2 of the DNSBL BCP - "collateral damage"
  - From: SM
- Re: [Asrg] Round 2 of the DNSBL BCP - "collateral damage"
  - From: David Nicol
- Re: [Asrg] Round 2 of the DNSBL BCP - "collateral damage"
  - From: Rich Kulawiec
- Re: [Asrg] Round 2 of the DNSBL BCP - "collateral damage"
  - From: Matthew Sullivan

Prev by Date: Re: [Asrg] Round 2 of the DNSBL BCP - "collateral damage"
Next by Date: Re: [Asrg] Round 2 of the DNSBL BCP - "collateral damage"
Previous by thread: Re: [Asrg] Round 2 of the DNSBL BCP - "collateral damage"
Next by thread: Re: [Asrg] Round 2 of the DNSBL BCP - "collateral damage"
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread