Re: [Asrg] Standards action recommended for draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl

[Dave Crocker <dhc at dcrocker.net>]

John Levine wrote:
>> Thanks for this input.  I've offered to sponsor this draft and I am  
>> specifically looking for input like this.  Can you expand on why you  
>> think it's better for the Internet for this to be on Standards Track,  
>> as opposed to Informational?   Are you aware of implementations or  
>> deployment experience?
> 
> Hi. If it would help, I can provide quite a long list both of people
> publishing DNSBLs the way this draft describes and of mail software
> that uses them.

Given how difficult it is to get public agreement for standards in this space, 
may I suggest that an interesting number of those people should post a message 
(relayed via John, if they aren't subscribed) to state that they have read the 
document and it accurately captures their existing practice?

5 or 10 such people posting such a message should eliminate any concern about 
the document's being an accurate reflection of existing practice, as well as 
whether the draft has significant direct industry support.

d/
-- 

   Dave Crocker
   Brandenburg InternetWorking
   bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg