[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Asrg] For DNSBLs, embedded IPv4 in IPv6

To: asrg at ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Asrg] For DNSBLs, embedded IPv4 in IPv6
From: John Levine <asrg at johnlevine.com>
Date: 4 Aug 2008 13:01:55 -0000
Delivered-to: ietfarch-asrg-web-archive at core3.amsl.com
Delivered-to: asrg at core3.amsl.com
In-reply-to: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0808040700230.27651@nber6.nber.org>
List-archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/asrg>
List-help: <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:asrg@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization:
Reply-to: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg at ietf.org>
Sender: asrg-bounces at ietf.org

>>> Someone pointed out that in some popular dual stack systems,
>>> connections from IPv4 addresses appear as IPv6 addresses
>>> in :FFFF:0000:0000/96
>
>Could someone explain why a DNSBL needs to return IPV6 addresses?

I don't know anyone who thinks that a DNSBL should return anything
other than A and TXT records.  What leads you to believe otherwise?

R's,
John
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Asrg] For DNSBLs, embedded IPv4 in IPv6
  - From: Douglas Otis
- Re: [Asrg] For DNSBLs, embedded IPv4 in IPv6
  - From: Daniel Feenberg
- Re: [Asrg] For DNSBLs, embedded IPv4 in IPv6
  - From: Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz

References:
- Re: [Asrg] For DNSBLs, embedded IPv4 in IPv6
  - From: Daniel Feenberg

Prev by Date: Re: [Asrg] IPv6 spam data
Next by Date: Re: [Asrg] For DNSBLs, embedded IPv4 in IPv6
Previous by thread: Re: [Asrg] For DNSBLs, embedded IPv4 in IPv6
Next by thread: Re: [Asrg] For DNSBLs, embedded IPv4 in IPv6
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread