[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Asrg] Not an IPv6 BCP?!

To: asrg at ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Asrg] Not an IPv6 BCP?!
From: "Frank Ellermann" <hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz at gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 14:39:06 +0200
Delivered-to: ietfarch-asrg-web-archive at core3.amsl.com
Delivered-to: asrg at core3.amsl.com
List-archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/asrg>
List-help: <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:asrg@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: <URL:http://purl.net/xyzzy>
References: <20080804160514.91828.qmail@simone.iecc.com> <C4BCA7E0.6219%jdfalk@returnpath.net><g77m12$m1j$1@ger.gmane.org> <4897B67B.2040307@att.com>
Reply-to: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg at ietf.org>
Sender: asrg-bounces at ietf.org

Tony Hansen wrote:

> ::2 is reserved for IETF use. This seems like it could
> be a perfectly valid such use to be defined for it.

Nice, then s/test/invalid/ was the last technical point,
anything else is wordsmithing and maybe adding BCP 91 or
similar in the references.

 Frank

_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg

References:
- Re: [Asrg] Not an IPv6 BCP?!
  - From: John Levine
- Re: [Asrg] Not an IPv6 BCP?!
  - From: J.D. Falk
- Re: [Asrg] Not an IPv6 BCP?!
  - From: Frank Ellermann
- Re: [Asrg] Not an IPv6 BCP?!
  - From: Tony Hansen

Prev by Date: Re: [Asrg] Not an IPv6 BCP?!
Next by Date: Re: [Asrg] For DNSBLs, embedded IPv4 in IPv6
Previous by thread: Re: [Asrg] Not an IPv6 BCP?!
Next by thread: Re: [Asrg] Not an IPv6 BCP?!
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread