Re: [Asrg] I-D Action: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl-08.txt (fwd)

["Chris Lewis" <clewis at nortel.com>]

John Levine wrote:
>>> Re your other point, if it seems likely that the BCP-ish doc can come
>>> out at the same time as the spec, I would of course adjust the reference
>>> to it from the current vague language to be more specific.
>> What's preventing the BCP-ish document coming out at the same time as
>> the spec?
> 
> The IRTF process requires that a couple of the other RG chairs review
> the docs for quality and wholesomeness, not to mention whether it
> makes sense to someone from the outside.  If they have suggestions,
> which they probably will, you respond to them.  (The RG suggestions
> for my draft were entirely constructive.)
> 
> If we can get the necessary reviews, you should be OK.  There's an
> IESG review, but that's supposed to be limited to seeing if it's an
> attempted end run around a WG or other procedural shenanigans, not
> whether they like what it says or not.

What do I need to do to have that process underway, or is it already?
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg at irtf.org
https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg