[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Asrg] Email Postage (was Re: FeedBack loops)





 
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 2:18 PM, Seth <sethb at panix.com> wrote:
"Gerald Klaas" <gklaas at sacto.com> wrote:

> You should print your own postage.  Not as a sender, but as the
> recipient.

That will do outblaze, AOL, gmail, and msn some good.  Not so much for
the rest of us; how many senders will care about our relatively tiny
domains?
 
 
 
Exactly why we need a standard framework for the use of stamps.
 
Indeed, AOL, gmail and MSN could set-up such a system for use just between themselves and benefit greatly from it.  But with a standard "stamp" framework, you could choose to put up your own "stamp" generator.  
 
So how does a sender know you require a stamp?  Where do they obtain one?  Once they've gotten one, how do they affix it to your e-mail (so that you can filter on it)?   Those are the questions a standard should answer.
 
Personally, I believe that there should be a standard method for deriving a URL from e-mail addresses.  That stamp generators should be placed at the derived URL, and that affixing a stamp (retrieved from the URL) should be in an "X-header".    That's clearly not the only possible approach, but the beginning of the discussion I'd like to see.
 
Gerald
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg at irtf.org
https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg