[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Asrg] moving the two DNSBL drafts forward
Rich Kulawiec wrote:
> One questions on irtf-asrg-dnsbl:
>
> Is it worth discussing usage of other means to propagate DNSxLs,
> e.g., rsync?
Unfortunately, there doesn't seem to be enough commonality to suggest
one way or another as being reasonably standard.
> Regardless of the answer, I think this one is fine.
>
>
> On irtf-asrg-bcp-blacklists, near the end of section 1.2, text reads:
>
> DNSBLs can, and have, ceased operation without notice. DNSBL users
> SHOULD periodically check the correct operation of the DNSBL, and
> cease using DNSBLs that are working incorrectly
>
> I suggest considering:
>
> DNSBLs can, and have, ceased operation without notice. DNSBL users
> SHOULD periodically check the correct operation of the DNSBL, and
> SHOULD cease using DNSBLs that are working incorrectly
>
> which adds a second "SHOULD" for clarity. But I freely admit that this
> may be a nit and not worth the bother. So again, regardless of the
> answer, I thinkFrom asrg-bounces at irtf.org Mon Nov 24 20:39:42 2008
Return-Path: <asrg-bounces at irtf.org>
X-Original-To: asrg-archive at optimus.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-asrg-archive at core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93ED43A691A;
Mon, 24 Nov 2008 20:39:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: asrg at core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: asrg at core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9910E3A67E3
for <asrg at core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Nov 2008 20:39:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32])
by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id z5UbRGFSzgZg for <asrg at core3.amsl.com>;
Mon, 24 Nov 2008 20:39:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from zrtps0kn.nortel.com (zrtps0kn.nortel.com [47.140.192.55])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CAAE3A6A20
for <asrg at irtf.org>; Mon, 24 Nov 2008 20:39:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from zrtphxs1.corp.nortel.com (zrtphxs1.corp.nortel.com
[47.140.202.46])
by zrtps0kn.nortel.com (Switch-2.2.6/Switch-2.2.0) with ESMTP id
mAP4dUH14915 for <asrg at irtf.org>; Tue, 25 Nov 2008 04:39:30 GMT
Received: from zrtphx5h0.corp.nortel.com ([47.140.202.65]) by
zrtphxs1.corp.nortel.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959);
Mon, 24 Nov 2008 23:39:30 -0500
Received: from [47.130.66.120] (47.130.66.120) by zrtphx5h0.corp.nortel.com
(47.140.202.65) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.1.311.2;
Mon, 24 Nov 2008 23:39:29 -0500
Message-ID: <492B8180.4080403 at nortel.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 23:39:28 -0500
From: "Chris Lewis" <clewis at nortel.com>
Organization: Nortel
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (Windows/20081105)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg at irtf.org>
References: <20081123230038.56893.qmail at simone.iecc.com> <4929F738.3010002 at nortel.com> <e0c581530811240824q3107b2e2xac7e2e26e0e463b5 at mail.gmail.com> <492AD8ED.7080802 at nortel.com>
<492B42B1.6010502 at dcrocker.net> <20081125021410.GA17840 at gsp.org>
In-Reply-To: <20081125021410.GA17840 at gsp.org>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Nov 2008 04:39:30.0346 (UTC)
FILETIME=[CE4638A0:01C94EB7]
Subject: Re: [Asrg] moving the two DNSBL drafts forward
X-BeenThere: asrg at irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg at irtf.org>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>,
<mailto:asrg-request at irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/pipermail/asrg>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg at irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request at irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>,
<mailto:asrg-request at irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: asrg-bounces at irtf.org
Errors-To: asrg-bounces at irtf.org
Rich Kulawiec wrote:
> One questions on irtf-asrg-dnsbl:
>
> Is it worth discussing usage of other means to propagate DNSxLs,
> e.g., rsync?
Unfortunately, there doesn't seem to be enough commonality to suggest
one way or another as being reasonably standard.
> Regardless of the answer, I think this one is fine.
>
>
> On irtf-asrg-bcp-blacklists, near the end of section 1.2, text reads:
>
> DNSBLs can, and have, ceased operation without notice. DNSBL users
> SHOULD periodically check the correct operation of the DNSBL, and
> cease using DNSBLs that are working incorrectly
>
> I suggest considering:
>
> DNSBLs can, and have, ceased operation without notice. DNSBL users
> SHOULD periodically check the correct operation of the DNSBL, and
> SHOULD cease using DNSBLs that are working incorrectly
>
> which adds a second "SHOULD" for clarity. But I freely admit that this
> may be a nit and not worth the bother. So again, regardless of the
> answer, I think this on this one is fine.
I can put that in the nit list, no biggie.
> Thank you to the authors for their diligence and hard work.
Thanks for helping!
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg at irtf.org
https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg
e is fine.
I can put that in the nit list, no biggie.
> Thank you to the authors for their diligence and hard work.
Thanks for helping!
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg at irtf.org
https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg