[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Asrg] is SMTP still really store-and-forward ?

To: "Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF" <asrg at irtf.org>
Subject: Re: [Asrg] is SMTP still really store-and-forward ?
From: "David Nicol" <davidnicol at gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 15:17:49 -0600
Delivered-to: ietfarch-asrg-web-archive at core3.amsl.com
Delivered-to: asrg at core3.amsl.com
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=FcFhveE6zmqtK7nRwmpjofIpsM2tgtIjrgGMUago23I=; b=aNjhMQsbLL6B2XDLbqRpNnE1exTAK2gPrhUZjD1znWo/W9EZmOBUIK5vJf8L7by8dQ IqPYDd16ev4OYBWxNhhfvNE9dLsRqRTZRxE6PN32WnxboKJmwnN1eTwnF7mlVfHsVMJW v2HVzcLJvg1jN7PSyNX3FafWOWNFI+xbkl9Z4=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=P9/gWcxoLCl4X+jHtJLzBjYdDe2Yf4DMcoLvtrttB5UyvegsIkqYsxT2CVm8nQsDzw hcsOrCzlmfp7cdbvwXNzdp0QJVs0+b22rj55RqtZKWnME/UbzS4J/EoDe+H9BBSFm92h 0meHg9m8mQSVcmRbd2B0aoVyIuMQ4dkkPZitI=
In-reply-to: <49305D03.6060306 at mtcc.com>
List-archive: <http://www.irtf.org/pipermail/asrg>
List-help: <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.irtf.org>
List-post: <mailto:asrg@irtf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <934f64a20811281121v1011a8au870511cb0ca69cea at mail.gmail.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20081128115800.033d6e40 at resistor.net> <49305D03.6060306 at mtcc.com>
Reply-to: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg at irtf.org>
Sender: asrg-bounces at irtf.org

On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 3:05 PM, Michael Thomas <mike at mtcc.com> wrote:
> The question I have is what problem is trying to be solved even if one
> were inclined to move away from store and forward. It's not very clear
> that there is one.
>
>      Mike

The problem is redefining large portions of e-mail operations outside
the scope of the FUSSP.

Just as internal ops are disincluded from RBL filtering, internal ops
should be left out of any other technique.

-- 
signature closed for repair
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg at irtf.org
https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg

References:
- [Asrg] is SMTP still really store-and-forward ?
  - From: David Nicol
- Re: [Asrg] is SMTP still really store-and-forward ?
  - From: SM
- Re: [Asrg] is SMTP still really store-and-forward ?
  - From: Michael Thomas

Prev by Date: Re: [Asrg] is SMTP still really store-and-forward ?
Next by Date: Re: [Asrg] is SMTP still really store-and-forward ?
Previous by thread: Re: [Asrg] is SMTP still really store-and-forward ?
Next by thread: Re: [Asrg] is SMTP still really store-and-forward ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread