[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Asrg] attention bonds, was Email Postage
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 03:52:43PM -0600, mathew wrote:
> Aren't ISPs already doing that, though?
Some are, as are some universities and other entities. Some aren't.
> And of course, spammers will just move to ISPs which aren't.
Of course.
> So it may not be eliminated, but I question whether it counts as a solution
> to anything.
As I was quite careful to point out, it's not a panacea. It is however,
effective where used, which is all that can be said about *any* solution.
It works with existing technology. It does not require reliance on
end-users or on end-user systems which stand a substantial chance of
being compromised. It does not require invention of any new protocols
nor promulgation of new standards. It's something that many MTA/network
operators can deploy (although by no means all).
---Rsk
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg at irtf.org
https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg
- References:
- Re: [Asrg] attention bonds, was Email Postage
- Re: [Asrg] attention bonds, was Email Postage
- Re: [Asrg] attention bonds, was Email Postage
- Re: [Asrg] attention bonds, was Email Postage
- Re: [Asrg] attention bonds, was Email Postage
- Re: [Asrg] attention bonds, was Email Postage
- Re: [Asrg] attention bonds, was Email Postage
- Re: [Asrg] attention bonds, was Email Postage
- Re: [Asrg] attention bonds, was Email Postage
- Re: [Asrg] attention bonds, was Email Postage