[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Asrg] A paper/project worth considering (found it!)
yes, I think also they are too stupid to choose their government ;)
slippery slope!
----- Original Message -----
From: "Rich Kulawiec" <rsk at gsp.org>
To: "Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF" <asrg at irtf.org>
Sent: Monday, 15 December, 2008 8:24:30 AM (GMT+1200) Auto-Detected
Subject: Re: [Asrg] A paper/project worth considering (found it!)
On Thu, Dec 04, 2008 at 11:18:47AM -0500, Chris Lewis wrote:
> We have a TIS button. I have no reason to believe that the error rate
> on hitting it is even as bad as 5%.
Interesting. As I mentioned elsewhere, I recently went through nearly
5 years of feedback loop reports from AOL and found that the error
rate was 100.00% -- every report ever filed was wrong. (I think I
also mentioned that I found cases where users reported *their own
messages* to mailing lists as spam.)
I have no reason to think AOL's users are any better or worse at this
than Comcast's or Yahoo's or any other ISP/mail provider. (I should
conjecture that Chris's users are better -- well, they'd have to be in
order to keep the error rate that From asrg-bounces at irtf.org Sun Dec 14 13:04:31 2008
Return-Path: <asrg-bounces at irtf.org>
X-Original-To: asrg-archive at optimus.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-asrg-archive at core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DD123A6805;
Sun, 14 Dec 2008 13:04:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: asrg at core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: asrg at core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AA563A6805
for <asrg at core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 14 Dec 2008 13:04:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32])
by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 8ykO1tcckXc9 for <asrg at core3.amsl.com>;
Sun, 14 Dec 2008 13:04:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from seine.avonsys.com (seine.avonsys.com [202.170.42.206])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EB853A67A1
for <asrg at irtf.org>; Sun, 14 Dec 2008 13:04:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by seine.avonsys.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD1CF147804
for <asrg at irtf.org>; Mon, 15 Dec 2008 09:04:16 +1200 (FJT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
Received: from seine.avonsys.com ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (seine.avonsys.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id BvZr9JE-SxUV for <asrg at irtf.org>;
Mon, 15 Dec 2008 09:04:13 +1200 (FJT)
Received: from localhost (unknown [113.20.67.79])
by seine.avonsys.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06411147801
for <asrg at irtf.org>; Mon, 15 Dec 2008 09:04:05 +1200 (FJT)
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 09:04:03 +1200 (ANAT)
From: Franck Martin <franck at avonsys.com>
To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg at irtf.org>
Message-ID: <15671454.261229288643701.JavaMail.franck at franck-martins-macbook-pro.local>
In-Reply-To: <20081214202430.GF9303 at gsp.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Asrg] A paper/project worth considering (found it!)
X-BeenThere: asrg at irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg at irtf.org>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>,
<mailto:asrg-request at irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/pipermail/asrg>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg at irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request at irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>,
<mailto:asrg-request at irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============2073488855=="
Sender: asrg-bounces at irtf.org
Errors-To: asrg-bounces at irtf.org
yes, I think also they are too stupid to choose their government ;)
slippery slope!
----- Original Message -----
From: "Rich Kulawiec" <rsk at gsp.org>
To: "Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF" <asrg at irtf.org>
Sent: Monday, 15 December, 2008 8:24:30 AM (GMT+1200) Auto-Detected
Subject: Re: [Asrg] A paper/project worth considering (found it!)
On Thu, Dec 04, 2008 at 11:18:47AM -0500, Chris Lewis wrote:
> We have a TIS button. I have no reason to believe that the error rate
> on hitting it is even as bad as 5%.
Interesting. As I mentioned elsewhere, I recently went through nearly
5 years of feedback loop reports from AOL and found that the error
rate was 100.00% -- every report ever filed was wrong. (I think I
also mentioned that I found cases where users reported *their own
messages* to mailing lists as spam.)
I have no reason to think AOL's users are any better or worse at this
than Comcast's or Yahoo's or any other ISP/mail provider. (I should
conjecture that Chris's users are better -- well, they'd have to be in
order to keep the error rate that much lower!)
I think at the scale of the Internet, users are awful at telling spam
from not-spam: if they were good at it, phishing would be a non-problem.
But let me put all of these conversation about end-user abilities
aside and look at this a different way. Anti-spam policy is as much a
security function as, say, firewall configuration; and there's no way
I'd even consider giving users the ability to affect that. It's all
very populist to give users these controls, but I think it's terribly
misguided and reflects a lack of realization that spam can be as much
of a security threat as malicious packets. Analyzing such threats
and devising effective counter-measures to them requires trained,
experienced people -- moreover, it requires people who have the
responsibility for doing so.
What I'm arguing (and I've argued this elsewhere) is that it's not
the role of end users to set anti-spam policy (in whole or in part)
any more than it's their role to set firewall policy. It's not their
job, and they're terrible at it.
---Rsk
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg at irtf.org
https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg at irtf.org
https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg