[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Asrg] where the message originated (was: DKIM role?) (SM)

To: "Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF" <asrg at irtf.org>
Subject: Re: [Asrg] where the message originated (was: DKIM role?) (SM)
From: Dotzero <dotzero at gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 08:51:57 -0500
Delivered-to: ietfarch-asrg-archive at core3.amsl.com
Delivered-to: asrg at core3.amsl.com
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=RucFtGmRZyq1CFEDHK08R2rHXyA8cCPWPAfDta5WBFc=; b=ZI5H112/9NlwfGNOQjekCRNdd08oSDRDH99d3nYyYjDXrG3JeAJFXCfDmGqV5+ipRw z1vQoNNy9Db18wph7dRfoz6az6rP5LCPrEmkIWIkzYGArJcZmQkv2E3LRrozZRihb+jh NcgY0S06C6B/WRun/yWjJY6UFuRLNezdpPpoI=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=mRmPy2S2R29jykSOFQDE6Ce9vAwPHF6cozCxY219vnx7BUGxinmHL+e5ujygakMghd rOqVNYgy36Y44zrwltk22VUB0sWOG0hpxHQGv0aCh009clQg1BGG3yShSFO7e9LhMvrv oGjusAX0ZqY3GUgEPkHMC+2UkElrToMNA2tF4=
In-reply-to: <5D7BDFBEE6628AAB358DB641 at lewes.staff.uscs.susx.ac.uk>
List-archive: <http://www.irtf.org/pipermail/asrg>
List-help: <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.irtf.org>
List-post: <mailto:asrg@irtf.org>
List-subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <mailman.1.1231617601.16691.asrg at irtf.org> <4969650A.7010006 at terabites.com> <5D7BDFBEE6628AAB358DB641 at lewes.staff.uscs.susx.ac.uk>
Reply-to: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg at irtf.org>
Sender: asrg-bounces at irtf.org

On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 6:33 AM, Ian Eiloart <iane at sussex.ac.uk> wrote:
>
>
> Actually, it occurred to me that we have mechanisms whereby domain owners
> can prevent abuse of their domains (SPF and DKIM). Therefore, we should feel
> free to bounce email to any domain owner the doesn't deploy SPF and DKIM -
> in order to encourage them to do so. Of course, bouncing email is also OK
> when you find an SPF or DKIM match.
>

Ian, the correct way of phrasing it is that SPF and DKIM can MITIGATE
(my emphasis) certain types of abuse of their domains.

I would also point out that someone could deploy an SPF record with a
+all. How does that prevent anything?
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg at irtf.org
http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Asrg] where the message originated (was: DKIM role?) (SM)
  - From: Ian Eiloart

References:
- Re: [Asrg] where the message originated (was: DKIM role?) (SM)
  - From: Gordon Peterson
- Re: [Asrg] where the message originated (was: DKIM role?) (SM)
  - From: Ian Eiloart

Prev by Date: Re: [Asrg] enough about backscatter
Next by Date: Re: [Asrg] enough about backscatter
Previous by thread: Re: [Asrg] where the message originated
Next by thread: Re: [Asrg] where the message originated (was: DKIM role?) (SM)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread