Re: [Asrg] About that e-postage draft [POSTAGE]

[Rich Kulawiec <rsk at gsp.org>]

On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 09:14:15AM -0600, mathew wrote:
> Nonsense. You just make the purchased stamp dependent upon the address of
> the recipient, for example by hashing the To: address inside the
> cryptographic stamp when it's minted.

How's that going to work with forwarding, virtual user tables, and
alias expansions?   And how will it avoid leaking information when
someone is BCC'd?

---Rsk