There is, actually. If you publish SPF records with a strong -all, then
recipients can easily decide to reject (not bounce) messages. Add DKIM
signatures, and they'll be able to tell when someone has forwarded your
legitimate email.
Do you have any evidence that this actually works to any detectable
degree?
I have solid proof that it is far from perfect, but I only have a handful
of addresses that ever had significant bogus bounce flow in the one
domain I could safely use in a SPF '-all' effectiveness test. The first 5
years of that test have shown a slow drop in the rate of bad bounces in
general offered to that domain, but it isn't much more proportionally
than the drop from a dribble to a trickle that I've seen for a domain
with no SPF record. The noise in my minuscule and weakly controlled data
makes it quantitatively worthless, but on a qualitative basis it makes
clear that strong SPF records are not yet a strong universal tool for
preventing blowback bounces.
If you are aware of SPF being any more useful than prayer at controlling
blowback, please share it.