--On 2 July 2009 14:13:49 +0000 John Levine <johnl at taugh.com> wrote:
If we're going to go back to first principles, how 'bout discussing the purpose of the ASRG? I joined thinking the word "research" was in there somewhere, but it's clear there's no research going on -- and none likely to occur.As far as I can tell, based on the papers at CEAS, there's precious little spam-related research going on anywhere. If people here were willing to put 1/10 of the work into research that they do into arguing, we might have some actual research. Perhaps I should make it so that whenever you update the wiki (where we are ever so slowly building a taxonomy of anti-spam techniques
<http://wiki.asrg.sp.am/wiki/Taxonomy_of_anti-spam_techniques>
and even more slowly of spamming techniques)
<http://wiki.asrg.sp.am/wiki/Taxonomy_of_spamming_techniques> "this is a place holder until some real content can be added" lol!
you get a credit that allows you to send one message. R's, John _______________________________________________ Asrg mailing list Asrg at irtf.org http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg
-- Ian Eiloart IT Services, University of Sussex 01273-873148 x3148 For new support requests, see http://www.sussex.ac.uk/its/help/