Re: [Asrg] defining the ASRG (was Re: draft-irtf-asrg-criteria (was Re: request for review for a non FUSSP proposal))

[Danny Angus <danny.angus at gmail.com>]

> If people here were willing to put 1/10 of the work into research that they
> do into arguing, we might have some actual research.

Amen.

> Perhaps I should make it so that whenever you update the wiki (where
> we are ever so slowly building a taxonomy of anti-spam techniques and
> even more slowly of spamming techniques) you get a credit that allows
> you to send one message.

+1

d.