Anti-Spam Research Group Discussion Archive - Thread Index

• Re: [Asrg] Why ISACS will proliferate even if you don't like it., (continued)
  • Re: [Asrg] Why ISACS will proliferate even if you don't like it., John Levine
    • Indirection as a useful tool (was Re: [Asrg] Why ISACS will proliferate even if you don't like it.), Danny Angus
      • [Asrg] Re: Indirection as a useful tool, John Levine
      • [Asrg] Re: Indirection as a useful tool, Danny Angus
  • Re: [Asrg] Why ISACS will proliferate even if you don't like it., Walter Dnes
    • Re: [Asrg] Why ISACS will proliferate even if you don't like it., Bart Schaefer
  • Re: [Asrg] Why ISACS will proliferate even if you don't like it., mathew
• [Asrg] Re: Spammers probing for whitelisted addresses?, Douglas Campbell
  • [Asrg] Re: Spammers probing for whitelisted addresses?, Frank Ellermann
  • Re: [Asrg] Re: Spammers probing for whitelisted addresses?, Daniel Feenberg
• [Asrg] "E-mail Defense Service" defects, gep2
• [Asrg] Spammers probing for whitelisted addresses?, Walter Dnes
  • [Asrg] RDynamic addresses, Daniel Feenberg
    • [Asrg] Re: RDynamic addresses, Frank Ellermann
    • Re: [Asrg] RDynamic addresses, Andreas Saurwein
    • Re: [Asrg] RDynamic addresses, Walter Dnes
• [Asrg] Proposal: SMTPCR, a kinder/gentler Challenge/Response, Walter Dnes
  • Re: [Asrg] Proposal: SMTPCR, a kinder/gentler Challenge/Response, Bart Schaefer
    • Re: [Asrg] Proposal: SMTPCR, a kinder/gentler Challenge/Response, Chris Callahan
  • [Asrg] Re: Proposal: SMTPCR, a kinder/gentler Challenge/Response, Frank Ellermann
  • Re: [Asrg] Proposal: SMTPCR, a kinder/gentler Challenge/Response, Peter J. Holzer
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [Asrg] Proposal: SMTPCR, a kinder/gentler Challenge/Response, Nick Nicholas
    • Re: [Asrg] Proposal: SMTPCR, a kinder/gentler Challenge/Response, Peter J. Holzer
• [Asrg] Unique innovations made to anti-spam system, Michael Kaplan
  • [Asrg] Re: Unique innovations made to anti-spam system, Frank Ellermann