Anti-Spam Research Group Discussion Archive - Thread Index

• Re: [Asrg] Filtering spam by detecting 'anti-Bayesian' elements?, (continued)
  • Re: [Asrg] Filtering spam by detecting 'anti-Bayesian' elements?, Jose Marcio Martins da Cruz
  • Re: [Asrg] Filtering spam by detecting 'anti-Bayesian' elements?, Laird Breyer
  • Re: [Asrg] Filtering spam by detecting 'anti-Bayesian' elements?, Jose Marcio Martins da Cruz
  • Re: [Asrg] Filtering spam by detecting 'anti-Bayesian' elements?, Markus Stumpf
  • Re: [Asrg] Filtering spam by detecting 'anti-Bayesian' elements?, Laird Breyer
  • Re: [Asrg] Filtering spam by detecting 'anti-Bayesian' elements?, Markus Stumpf
  • Re: [Asrg] Filtering spam by detecting 'anti-Bayesian' elements?, Jim Witte
  • Re: [Asrg] Filtering spam by detecting 'anti-Bayesian' elements?, Laird Breyer
  • RE: [Asrg] Filtering spam by detecting 'anti-Bayesian' elements?, Brian Azzopardi
    • Re: [Asrg] Filtering spam by detecting 'anti-Bayesian' elements?, Jose Marcio Martins da Cruz
• [Asrg] standard for anti-spam, mel
• [Asrg] standard for antispam, mel
  • Re: [Asrg] standard for antispam, Peter Bowyer
• [Asrg] Patenting HOWTO/FAQ ?, Hadmut Danisch
  • Re: [Asrg] Patenting HOWTO/FAQ ?, william(at)elan.net
  • Re: [Asrg] Patenting HOWTO/FAQ ?, Jed Margolin
• Re: [Asrg] SPF is only useful to dupe the ignorant...], Fridrik Skulason
  • Re: [Asrg] SPF is only useful to dupe the ignorant...], Bill Cole
    • Re: [Asrg] SPF is only useful to dupe the ignorant...], Laird Breyer
      • Re: [Asrg] SPF is only useful to dupe the ignorant...], Bill Cole
      • Re: [Asrg] SPF is only useful to dupe the ignorant...], Laird Breyer
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Asrg] SPF is only useful to dupe the ignorant...], Bill Cole
    • Re: [Asrg] SPF is only useful to dupe the ignorant...], Laird Breyer
• [Asrg] SPF is only useful to dupe the ignorant..., Barry Shein
  • Re: [Asrg] SPF is only useful to dupe the ignorant..., Seth Breidbart