Anti-Spam Research Group Discussion Archive - Thread Index

[Prev Page] [Next Page] [Date Index] [IETF Announcements Archive]

RE: [Asrg] CRI Header, (continued)
- RE: [Asrg] CRI Header, Eric D. Williams
  - RE: [Asrg] CRI Header, Eric Dean
    - RE: [Asrg] CRI Header, Yakov Shafranovich
    - Re: [Asrg] CRI Header, waltdnes
    - Re: [Asrg] CRI Header, Yakov Shafranovich
    - Re: [Asrg] CRI Header, waltdnes
    - Re: [Asrg] CRI Header, Yakov Shafranovich
- Re: [Asrg] CRI Header, Yakov Shafranovich
- RE: [Asrg] CRI Header, bukys
  - RE: [Asrg] CRI Header, Yakov Shafranovich
- RE: [Asrg] CRI Header, Eric Dean
- RE: [Asrg] CRI Header, Yakov Shafranovich
- RE: [Asrg] CRI Header, Peter Kay
- RE: [Asrg] CRI Header, Yakov Shafranovich
- RE: [Asrg] CRI Header, Eric D. Williams
  - RE: [Asrg] CRI Header, Yakov Shafranovich
- RE: [Asrg] CRI Header, Eric D. Williams
  - RE: [Asrg] CRI Header, Yakov Shafranovich
- RE: [Asrg] CRI Header, Eric D. Williams
- RE: [Asrg] CRI Header, Yakov Shafranovich
- RE: [Asrg] CRI Header, Eric D. Williams
- RE: [Asrg] CRI Header, Eric D. Williams
[Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., Barry Shein
- Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
- Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., Bill Cole
  - Message not available
    - Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., Dave Crocker
    - Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., Vernon Schryver
    - Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., Bill Cole
    - Message not available
    - Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., Dave Crocker
- Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., Dave Crocker
- Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., Dave Aronson
  - Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
- Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., Art Pollard
  - Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., Vernon Schryver
- Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., mathew
  - Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., Margie Arbon
    - Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., Vernon Schryver
    - Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., mathew
  - Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., Dave Aronson
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., Peter Kay
- RE: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., Eric D. Williams
  - Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
  - Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., Dave Aronson
    - Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., Alberto França
    - Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., Barry Shein
    - Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., Yakov Shafranovich
    - Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., Barry Shein
    - Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., Barry Shein
    - [Asrg] Spam Isn't Just Sleaze (was: Another criteria for "what is spam"...), Dave Aronson
- RE: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., Hallam-Baker, Phillip
  - Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., kent
- RE: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., Yakov Shafranovich
- RE: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., Peter Kay
  - RE: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., Vernon Schryver
- RE: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., Bill Cole
- RE: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., Peter Kay
  - RE: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., Vernon Schryver
- Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., kent
- RE: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., Peter Kay
  - RE: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., Vernon Schryver
- RE: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., Peter Kay
  - RE: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., Barry Shein
    - Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., Dave Aronson
    - Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., C. Wegrzyn
    - Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., Vernon Schryver
    - Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., Barry Shein
    - Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., Vernon Schryver
    - Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., mathew
    - Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., waltdnes
    - Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., Vernon Schryver
    - Message not available
    - Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., Dave Aronson
    - Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., Barry Shein
    - Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., Barry Shein
    - Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., mathew
- RE: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., Peter Kay
  - RE: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., Barry Shein
  - RE: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., Vernon Schryver
  - [Asrg] Implicit Consent (was: Another criteria for "what is spam"...), Dave Aronson
- RE: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., Peter Kay
  - [Asrg] Line Fuzziness (was: Another criteria for "what is spam"...), Dave Aronson
- RE: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., Peter Kay
  - RE: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., Barry Shein
- RE: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., Eric D. Williams
- RE: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., Peter Kay
- RE: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., Peter Kay
  - RE: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., Vernon Schryver
  - Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., waltdnes
- RE: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., Bill Cole
- RE: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., Beadles, Mark A
Re: [Asrg] CRI Header [correction], Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] Short-term versus Long-term focus: A bit of economics, John Fenley
RE: [Asrg] Re: Tracking patent claims - please also track evidence of previous work., Peter Kay
- RE: [Asrg] Re: Tracking patent claims - please also track evidence of previous work., Eric Dean
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: [Asrg] Re: Tracking patent claims - please also track evidence of previous work., Yakov Shafranovich
RE: Short-term versus Long-term focus: A bit of economics ( was: RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (..."improves" C/R utility?)), Eric D. Williams
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Short-term versus Long-term focus: A bit of economics ( was: RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (..."improves" C/R utility?)), Eric D. Williams
- RE: Short-term versus Long-term focus: A bit of economics ( was: RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (..."improves" C/R utility?)), Peter Kay
- RE: Short-term versus Long-term focus: A bit of economics ( was: RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (..."improves" C/R utility?)), Eric D. Williams
Re: [Asrg] Re: Tracking patent claims - please also track evidence of previous work., Scott Nelson
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [Asrg] Re: Tracking patent claims - please also track evidence of previous work., Yakov Shafranovich
[Asrg] Re: Tracking patent claims - please also track evidence ofprevious work., Yakov Shafranovich
- Re: [Asrg] Re: Tracking patent claims - please also track evidenceof previous work., Harry Tabak
  - Re: [Asrg] Re: Tracking patent claims - please also track evidence of previous work., Yakov Shafranovich
[Asrg] Tracking patent claims - please also track evidence of previous work., David Wheeler
[Asrg] RMX: New draft and implementation, Hadmut Danisch
- Re: [Asrg] RMX: New draft and implementation, Meng Weng Wong
[Asrg] Whitelist conforming definition, Eric D. Williams
- <Possible follow-ups>
- FW: [Asrg] Whitelist conforming definition, Eric D. Williams
Re: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (..."improves" C/R utility?), John Fenley
- Short-term versus Long-term focus: A bit of economics ( was: RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (..."improves" C/R utility?)), Bob Wyman
  - RE: Short-term versus Long-term focus: A bit of economics ( was: RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (..."improves" C/R utility?)), Bob Wyman
  - Re: Short-term versus Long-term focus: A bit of economics ( was: RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (..."improves" C/R utility?)), Barry Shein
    - RE: Short-term versus Long-term focus: A bit of economics ( was: RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (..."improves" C/R utility?)), Bob Wyman
    - RE: Short-term versus Long-term focus: A bit of economics ( was: RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (..."improves" C/R utility?)), Barry Shein
    - [Asrg] CRI Header, Eric Dean
    - Re: [Asrg] CRI Header, Vernon Schryver
    - Re: [Asrg] CRI Header, Yakov Shafranovich
    - Re: [Asrg] CRI Header, Vernon Schryver
- Re: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (..."improves" C/Rutility?), Kee Hinckley
- Re: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (..."improves" C/R utility?), Barry Shein
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (..."improves" C/R utility?), Scott Nelson
RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Yakov Shafranovich
- RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Vernon Schryver
- RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Eric Dean
RE: [Asrg] The level of discourse has degenerated... It ain't useful., Paul Judge
[Asrg] IP cross post (interesting RMX reception...), Eric D. Williams
- Re: [Asrg] IP cross post (interesting RMX reception...), Dave Crocker
[Asrg] 3. Volunteers to work on Requirements, Eric D. Williams
RE: ADV: (was Re: [Asrg] Article - New anti-spam proposal in the House of Representative), Eric D. Williams
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: ADV: (was Re: [Asrg] Article - New anti-spam proposal in the House of Representative), Eric D. Williams
  - RE: ADV: (was Re: [Asrg] Article - New anti-spam proposal in theHouse of Representative), Kee Hinckley
    - RE: ADV: (was Re: [Asrg] Article - New anti-spam proposal in the House of Representative), Jon Kyme
- RE: ADV: (was Re: [Asrg] Article - New anti-spam proposal in the House of Representative), Scott Nelson
  - RE: ADV: (was Re: [Asrg] Article - New anti-spam proposal in the House of Representative), Eric Dean
RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Bob Wyman
- RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Barry Shein
  - RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Yakov Shafranovich
  - RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Vernon Schryver
    - RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Yakov Shafranovich
    - RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Vernon Schryver
    - [Asrg] The level of discourse has degenerated... It ain't useful., Bob Wyman
    - RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Barry Shein
    - RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Vernon Schryver
    - RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Barry Shein
    - RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Vernon Schryver
    - Re: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), kent
    - RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Barry Shein
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Eric Dean
- RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Eric D. Williams
- RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Yakov Shafranovich
  - RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Eric Dean
- RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Peter Kay
  - RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Bob Wyman
  - RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Yakov Shafranovich
- RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Peter Kay
- RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Peter Kay
Re: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Yakov Shafranovich
- Re: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Peter Kay
  - RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Bob Wyman
  - Re: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
- Re: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Yakov Shafranovich
- RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Peter Kay
  - Re: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), waltdnes
- RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Eric D. Williams
- RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Eric D. Williams
  - RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Vernon Schryver
- RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Eric D. Williams
- RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Eric D. Williams
  - RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Vernon Schryver
    - RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Barry Shein
- RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Scott Nelson
  - RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Barry Shein
- RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Eric D. Williams
- RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Eric D. Williams
  - RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Vernon Schryver
- RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Yakov Shafranovich
[Asrg] RE: TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Peter Kay
- Re: [Asrg] RE: TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Richard Rognlie
  - RE: [Asrg] RE: TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Bob Wyman
    - [Asrg] Xircom Patent (was TitanKey etc.), Yakov Shafranovich
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: [Asrg] RE: TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Peter Kay
- RE: [Asrg] RE: TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Peter Kay
- RE: [Asrg] RE: TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Peter Kay
- Re: [Asrg] Re: TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Scott Nelson
  - Re: [Asrg] Re: TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Vernon Schryver
  - Re: [Asrg] Re: TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors"improves" C/R utility?), mathew
- Re: [Asrg] Re: TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Scott Nelson
  - Re: [Asrg] Re: TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Vernon Schryver
- RE: [Asrg] Re: TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Eric D. Williams
- Re: [Asrg] Re: TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Scott Nelson
  - Re: [Asrg] Re: TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Vernon Schryver
- RE: [Asrg] Re: TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Eric D. Williams
- Re: [Asrg] Re: TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Scott Nelson
RE: [Asrg] (Position): Successful anti-spam techniques must avoid software patents, Peter Kay
- RE: [Asrg] (Position): Successful anti-spam techniques must avoid software patents, Bob Wyman
- [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Bob Wyman
  - Re: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Barry Shein
    - Re: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Barry Shein
    - [Asrg] Re: TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors"improves" C/R utility?), Jason R. Mastaler
    - Re: [Asrg] Re: TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors"improves" C/R utility?), Barry Shein
    - Re: [Asrg] Re: TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), mathew
    - Re: [Asrg] Re: TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Dave Aronson
    - Re: [Asrg] Re: TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Vernon Schryver
    - Re: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Yakov Shafranovich
    - Re: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Yakov Shafranovich
  - Re: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), waltdnes
    - Re: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Yakov Shafranovich
  - Re: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Vernon Schryver
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: [Asrg] (Position): Successful anti-spam techniques must avoid software patents, Yakov Shafranovich
- Re: [Asrg] (Position): Successful anti-spam techniques must avoid software patents, Vern Paxson
  - Re: [Asrg] (Position): Successful anti-spam techniques must avoid software patents, Spencer Dawkins
- RE: [Asrg] (Position): Successful anti-spam techniques must avoid software patents, Peter Kay
- Re: [Asrg] (Position): Successful anti-spam techniques must avoid software patents, Yakov Shafranovich
[Asrg] Choicelist, John Fenley
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [Asrg] Choicelist, Jamie Lawrence
- Re: [Asrg] Choicelist, John Fenley
[Asrg] Standard headers for anti-spam systems, Yakov Shafranovich
[Asrg] News Article - ASRG Slashdotted, Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] Patents and ASRG (was (Position): Successful anti-spam techniques must avoid software patents), Yakov Shafranovich
[Asrg] (Position): Successful anti-spam techniques must avoid software patents, David Wheeler
- RE: [Asrg] (Position): Successful anti-spam techniques must avoid software patents, Bob Wyman
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: [Asrg] (Position): Successful anti-spam techniques must avoid software patents, Paul Judge
  - Re: [Asrg] (Position): Successful anti-spam techniques must avoid software patents, David Wheeler
    - Re: [Asrg] (Position): Successful anti-spam techniques must avoid software patents, mathew
[Asrg] Challenge-response issues and solutions: see "Guarded Email" paper., David Wheeler
- Re: [Asrg] Challenge-response issues and solutions: see "Guarded Email" paper., Yakov Shafranovich
[Asrg] News Article - C/R systems and mailing lists, Yakov Shafranovich
[Asrg] Brad Templeton's C/R Guidelines, Yakov Shafranovich
- [Asrg] Re: Brad Templeton's C/R Guidelines, Jason R. Mastaler
  - RE: [Asrg] Re: Brad Templeton's C/R Guidelines, Eric Dean
    - [Asrg] Re: Brad Templeton's C/R Guidelines, Jason R. Mastaler
    - RE: [Asrg] Re: Brad Templeton's C/R Guidelines, Eric Dean
RE: [Asrg] C/R Interworking Framework, Eric Dean
- RE: [Asrg] C/R Interworking Framework, Yakov Shafranovich
  - RE: [Asrg] C/R Interworking Framework, Eric Dean
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: [Asrg] C/R Interworking Framework, Yakov Shafranovich
- Re: [Asrg] C/R Interworking Framework, John Fenley
  - Re: [Asrg] C/R Interworking Framework, Yakov Shafranovich
    - Re: [Asrg] C/R Interworking Framework, Vernon Schryver
    - RE: [Asrg] C/R Interworking Framework, Eric Dean
- RE: [Asrg] C/R Interworking Framework, Peter Kay
  - Re: [Asrg] C/R Interworking Framework, Dave Aronson
    - Re: [Asrg] C/R Interworking Framework, Yakov Shafranovich
    - Re: [Asrg] C/R Interworking Framework, Kee Hinckley
- Re: [Asrg] C/R Interworking Framework, Yakov Shafranovich
  - Re: [Asrg] C/R Interworking Framework, Vernon Schryver
- RE: [Asrg] C/R Interworking Framework, Peter Kay
- Re: [Asrg] C/R Interworking Framework, Yakov Shafranovich
- Re: [Asrg] C/R Interworking Framework, Vernon Schryver
- Re: [Asrg] C/R Interworking Framework, Yakov Shafranovich
- Re: [Asrg] C/R Interworking Framework, Vernon Schryver
  - Re: [Asrg] C/R Interworking Framework, Yakov Shafranovich
- Re: [Asrg] C/R Interworking Framework, Scott Nelson
- RE: [Asrg] C/R Interworking Framework, Peter Kay
- RE: [Asrg] C/R Interworking Framework, Peter Kay
- RE: [Asrg] C/R Interworking Framework, Scott Nelson
- RE: [Asrg] C/R Interworking Framework, Peter Kay
  - RE: [Asrg] C/R Interworking Framework, Yakov Shafranovich
  - Re: [Asrg] C/R Interworking Framework, Rob Cameron
    - Re: [Asrg] C/R Interworking Framework, Art Pollard
- RE: [Asrg] C/R Interworking Framework, Peter Kay
- Re: [Asrg] C/R Interworking Framework, Yakov Shafranovich
- RE: [Asrg] C/R Interworking Framework, Peter Kay
- Re: [Asrg] C/R Interworking Framework, Yakov Shafranovich
- RE: [Asrg] C/R Interworking Framework, Eric D. Williams
  - RE: [Asrg] C/R Interworking Framework, Art Pollard
- RE: [Asrg] C/R Interworking Framework, Yakov Shafranovich
- RE: [Asrg] C/R Interworking Framework, Art Pollard
  - RE: [Asrg] C/R Interworking Framework, Yakov Shafranovich
- RE: [Asrg] C/R Interworking Framework, Eric D. Williams
[Asrg] What are your criteria for the end of spam?, Shannon Jacobs
- Re: [Asrg] What are your criteria for the end of spam?, David Cheatham
- [Asrg] Re: What are your criteria for the end of spam?, Rodney Tillotson
  - Re: [Asrg] Re: What are your criteria for the end of spam?, Shannon Jacobs
    - Re: [Asrg] Re: What are your criteria for the end of spam?, Barry Shein
[Asrg] Need to know, Scott Nelson
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [Asrg] Need to know, Yakov Shafranovich
- Re: [Asrg] Need to know, Scott Nelson
  - Re: [Asrg] Need to know, Markus Stumpf
- Re: [Asrg] Need to know, Scott Nelson
  - Re: [Asrg] Need to know, Markus Stumpf
- Re: [Asrg] Need to know, Scott Nelson
  - Re: [Asrg] Need to know, Steven F Siirila
RE: [Asrg] Economic methods for controlling spam (was [Yet anothe r] article on spam), Eric D. Williams
[Asrg] The combination of legislation and technology (was: Article - New anti-spam proposal in the House of Representative), Paul Judge
- Re: [Asrg] The combination of legislation and technology (was: Articl e - New anti-spam proposal in the House of Representative), Dave Crocker
  - Re: [Asrg] The combination of legislation and technology (was: Articl e - New anti-spam proposal in the House of Representative), Troy Rollo
    - Re: [Asrg] The combination of legislation and technology (was: Articl e - New anti-spam proposal in the House of Representative), mathew
RE: [Asrg] Economic methods for controlling spam (was [Yet another] article on spam), Paul Judge
- RE: [Asrg] Economic methods for controlling spam (was [Yet another] article on spam), Howard Roth
  - RE: [Asrg] Economic methods for controlling spam (was [Yet another] article on spam), Yakov Shafranovich
  - RE: [Asrg] Economic methods for controlling spam (was [Yetanother] article on spam), Kee Hinckley
[Asrg] Article - New anti-spam proposal in the House of Representative, Yakov Shafranovich
- Re: [Asrg] Article - New anti-spam proposal in the House of Representative, Richard Rognlie
  - Re: [Asrg] Article - New anti-spam proposal in the House of Representative, Barry Shein
  - RE: [Asrg] Article - New anti-spam proposal in the House of Representative, Tom Thomson
- Re: [Asrg] Article - New anti-spam proposal in the House ofRepresentative, Kee Hinckley
  - RE: [Asrg] Article - New anti-spam proposal in the House of Representative, Bob Wyman
    - RE: [Asrg] Article - New anti-spam proposal in the House of Representative, Barry Shein
    - Re: [Asrg] Article - New anti-spam proposal in the House of Representative, Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
    - RE: [Asrg] Article - New anti-spam proposal in the House of Representative, Vernon Schryver
  - Re: ADV: (was Re: [Asrg] Article - New anti-spam proposal in the House of Representative), mathew
    - Re: ADV: (was Re: [Asrg] Article - New anti-spam proposal in theHouse of Representative), Kee Hinckley
    - Re: ADV: (was Re: [Asrg] Article - New anti-spam proposal in the House of Representative), Vernon Schryver
    - Re: ADV: (was Re: [Asrg] Article - New anti-spam proposal in theHouse of Representative), Kee Hinckley
    - Re: ADV: (was Re: [Asrg] Article - New anti-spam proposal in the House of Representative), Vernon Schryver
    - Re: ADV: (was Re: [Asrg] Article - New anti-spam proposal in theHouse of Representative), Kee Hinckley
    - Re: ADV: (was Re: [Asrg] Article - New anti-spam proposal in the House of Representative), Vernon Schryver
    - Re: ADV: (was Re: [Asrg] Article - New anti-spam proposal in theHouse of Representative), Kee Hinckley
    - Re: ADV: (was Re: [Asrg] Article - New anti-spam proposal in the House of Representative), Vernon Schryver
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: [Asrg] Article - New anti-spam proposal in the House of Representative, Eric D. Williams
[Asrg] This mail list has been hacked, Jed Margolin
- Re: [Asrg] This mail list has been hacked, Karl Kraft
  - Re: [Asrg] This mail list has been hacked, Terri Oda
    - Re: [Asrg] This mail list has been hacked, Vernon Schryver
    - Re: [Asrg] This mail list has been hacked, Jed Margolin
    - Re: [Asrg] This mail list has been hacked, Kee Hinckley
    - Re: [Asrg] This mail list has been hacked, Ken Hirsch
- Re: [Asrg] This mail list has been hacked, C. Wegrzyn
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: [Asrg] This mail list has been hacked, Paul Judge
RE: [Asrg] SHOULD filtering be done as part of SMTP transaction, Jon Kyme
- RE: [Asrg] SHOULD filtering be done as part of SMTP transaction, Barry Shein
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: [Asrg] SHOULD filtering be done as part of SMTP transaction, Jon Kyme
This is a research group not a standards group (was RE: [Asrg] Shannon Jacob's article on spam), Paul Judge
- Re: This is a research group not a standards group (was RE: [Asrg] Sh annon Jacob's article on spam), Yakov Shafranovich
[Asrg] ACK4, Scott Nelson
- Re: [Asrg] ACK4, Vernon Schryver
  - Re: [Asrg] ACK4, Jon Kyme
- Re: [Asrg] ACK4, Jon Kyme
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [Asrg] ACK4, scott
  - Re: [Asrg] ACK4, Jon Kyme
- Re: [Asrg] ACK4, Scott Nelson
  - Re: [Asrg] ACK4, Jon Kyme
[Asrg] SHOULD filtering be done as part of SMTP transaction (was RE: Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses), Paul Judge
- Re: [Asrg] SHOULD filtering be done as part of SMTP transaction (was RE: Som e data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses), Jon Kyme
- Re: [Asrg] SHOULD filtering be done as part of SMTP transaction (was RE: Som e data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses), Jon Kyme
  - Re: [Asrg] SHOULD filtering be done as part of SMTP transaction, Vernon Schryver
[Asrg] Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-crocker-spam-techconsider-01.txt, Dave Crocker
[Asrg] MailFrontier and Patents, Yakov Shafranovich
[Asrg] Jay-Random subject line, Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
[Asrg] types of spammers (was: ASRG as a source of spam?), Paul Judge
[Asrg] News Article - MailBlocks, Patents and Prior Art, Yakov Shafranovich
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: [Asrg] News Article - MailBlocks, Patents and Prior Art, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
  - RE: [Asrg] News Article - MailBlocks, Patents and Prior Art, Bob Wyman
[Asrg] Could/Should/Must law require mechanism?, Bob Wyman
- Re: [Asrg] Could/Should/Must law require mechanism?, Barry Shein
- Re: [Asrg] Could/Should/Must law require mechanism?, waltdnes
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [Asrg] Could/Should/Must law require mechanism?, Jeffrey Race
  - Re: [Asrg] Could/Should/Must law require mechanism?, Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
    - RE: [Asrg] Could/Should/Must law require mechanism?, Tom Thomson
    - Re: [Asrg] Could/Should/Must law require mechanism?, Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
    - RE: [Asrg] Could/Should/Must law require mechanism?, Tom Thomson
    - Re: [Asrg] Could/Should/Must law require mechanism?, Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
    - Re: [Asrg] Could/Should/Must law require mechanism?, Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
  - Re: [Asrg] Could/Should/Must law require mechanism?, Daniel Feenberg
- Re: [Asrg] Could/Should/Must law require mechanism?, Jeffrey Race
  - Re: [Asrg] Could/Should/Must law require mechanism?, Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
- RE: [Asrg] Could/Should/Must law require mechanism?, Eric D. Williams
[Asrg] Shannon Jacob's article on spam, Chui Tey
- Re: [Asrg] Shannon Jacob's article on spam, Shannon Jacobs
  - Re: [Asrg] Shannon Jacob's article on spam, Kee Hinckley
    - Re: [Asrg] Shannon Jacob's article on spam, Shannon Jacobs
    - Re: [Asrg] Shannon Jacob's article on spam, Yakov Shafranovich
    - Re: [Asrg] Shannon Jacob's article on spam, Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
    - Re: [Asrg] Shannon Jacob's article on spam, Kee Hinckley
    - Re: [Asrg] Shannon Jacob's article on spam, Kee Hinckley
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [Asrg] Shannon Jacob's article on spam, Yakov Shafranovich
- Re: [Asrg] Shannon Jacob's article on spam, John Fenley
  - Re: [Asrg] [Yet another] article on spam, Shannon Jacobs
    - [Asrg] Economic methods for controlling spam (was [Yet another]article on spam), Yakov Shafranovich
    - [Asrg] Re: Pay-for-attention (Was Re: article on spam), mathew
    - [Asrg] Re: Pay-for-attention (Was Re: article on spam), Kee Hinckley
    - Re: [Asrg] Re: Pay-for-attention (Was Re: article on spam), Mitch Wagner
[Asrg] ASRG as a source of spam?, Shannon Jacobs
- Re: [Asrg] ASRG as a source of spam?, Larry Marks
  - Re: [Asrg] ASRG as a source of spam?, Shannon Jacobs
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: [Asrg] ASRG as a source of spam?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
  - RE: [Asrg] ASRG as a source of spam?, Daniel Feenberg
  - Re: [Asrg] ASRG as a source of spam?, Larry Marks
  - Re: [Asrg] ASRG as a source of spam?, Justin Mason
  - RE: [Asrg] ASRG as a source of spam?, Eric Dean
[Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Kee Hinckley
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Jon Kyme
  - Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Kee Hinckley
    - Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Yakov Shafranovich
    - Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Kee Hinckley
    - Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Vernon Schryver
    - Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Dave Crocker
    - Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Jon Kyme
    - Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, wayne
    - Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Vernon Schryver
    - Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Yakov Shafranovich
    - Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Jon Kyme
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Vernon Schryver
  - Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Kee Hinckley
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Fred Bacon
  - Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Kee Hinckley
    - Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Vernon Schryver
    - Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Kee Hinckley
    - Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Vernon Schryver
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Yakov Shafranovich
  - Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Vernon Schryver
    - Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Yakov Shafranovich
    - Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Kee Hinckley
    - Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, mathew
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Markus Stumpf
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Yakov Shafranovich
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Jon Kyme
  - Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Alan DeKok
    - Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Vernon Schryver
    - Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Michael Rubel
    - Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Vernon Schryver
    - Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Michael Rubel
    - Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Alan DeKok
    - RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Eric Dean
    - RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Vernon Schryver
    - RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Kee Hinckley
    - RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Eric Dean
    - RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Eric Dean
    - RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Tom Thomson
    - Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Alan DeKok
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Scott Nelson
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Scott Nelson
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Scott Nelson
  - Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Alan DeKok
  - Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Kee Hinckley
    - Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Vernon Schryver
  - Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Chris Lewis
- RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
  - RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Vernon Schryver
    - RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Barry Shein
  - RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Eric Dean
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Jon Kyme
  - RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Eric Dean
    - Re: RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Jon Kyme
    - RE: RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Eric Dean
  - Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Yakov Shafranovich
    - Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Michael Rubel
    - Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Jon Kyme
    - Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Michael Rubel
    - Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Vernon Schryver
    - Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Michael Rubel
    - Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Vernon Schryver
    - Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Kee Hinckley
    - Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Vernon Schryver
    - Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Jon Kyme
    - Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Richard Rognlie
    - Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Kee Hinckley
    - Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Vernon Schryver
    - RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Tom Thomson
    - Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Jon Kyme
    - Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Jon Kyme
    - Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Barry Shein
    - Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Kee Hinckley
    - Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Daniel Feenberg
    - Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Michael Rubel
    - Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Yakov Shafranovich
- Re: RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Jon Kyme
  - Re: RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Kee Hinckley
    - Re: RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Jon Kyme
- RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Eric D. Williams
- RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Eric D. Williams
  - RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Barry Shein
    - RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Kee Hinckley
- RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Eric D. Williams
- RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Eric D. Williams
- RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Eric D. Williams
  - RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Vernon Schryver
- RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Clayton, Nik [IT]
  - Re: RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Jon Kyme
- Re: RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Jon Kyme
- RE: RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Clayton, Nik [IT]
- RE: RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Clayton, Nik [IT]
  - Re: RE: RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Jon Kyme
- RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Yakov Shafranovich
  - Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Justin Mason
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Yakov Shafranovich
- RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Eric D. Williams
- RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Eric D. Williams
RE: [Asrg] C/R - What people say, Eric D. Williams
- RE: [Asrg] C/R - What people say, Yakov Shafranovich
- RE: [Asrg] C/R - What people say, Eric Dean
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: [Asrg] C/R - What people say, Paul Judge
[Asrg] News Article - FTC targeting open relays, Yakov Shafranovich
- Re: [Asrg] News Article - FTC targeting open relays, mathew
  - Re: [Asrg] News Article - FTC targeting open relays, Yakov Shafranovich
    - Re: [Asrg] News Article - FTC targeting open relays, Steve Atkins
    - Re: [Asrg] News Article - FTC targeting open relays, Yakov Shafranovich
    - Re: [Asrg] News Article - FTC targeting open relays, Jon Kyme
    - Re: [Asrg] News Article - FTC targeting open relays, Barry Shein
    - Re: [Asrg] News Article - FTC targeting open relays, Kee Hinckley
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: [Asrg] News Article - FTC targeting open relays, Paul Judge
  - Re: [Asrg] News Article - FTC targeting open relays, Steve Atkins
- RE: [Asrg] News Article - FTC targeting open relays, Eric D. Williams
- RE: [Asrg] News Article - FTC targeting open relays, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
  - Re: [Asrg] News Article - FTC targeting open relays, Steve Atkins
  - RE: [Asrg] News Article - FTC targeting open relays, Vernon Schryver
[Asrg] Bruce Schneier on unique email addresses..., Bob Wyman
[Asrg] Spam is good?, Roy S. Walker

Mail converted by MHonArc