Anti-Spam Research Group Discussion Archive - Thread Index
[Prev Page] [Next Page] [Date Index]
[IETF Announcements Archive]
[Asrg] Microsoft files suit against Spammers,
Bob Wyman
[Asrg] Re: Reverse DNS,
gep2
[Asrg] Reverse DNS,
gep2
[Asrg] SPF and other spam approaches,
gep2
[Asrg] UK public inquiry on spam,
Jon Kyme
Re: [Asrg] Re: SPF: Objection 9,
Jon Kyme
Re: [Asrg] SPF: Summary of Objections,
Scott Nelson
Re: [Asrg] Spammer responses to SPF,
Scott Nelson
[Asrg] Re: CLOSE ASRG NOW IT HAS FAILED,
Vern Paxson
[Asrg] Introduction and another idea,
gep2
- RE: [Asrg] Introduction and another idea,
Bob Wyman
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [Asrg] Introduction and another idea,
gep2
- RE: [Asrg] Introduction and another idea,
gep2
- Re: [Asrg] Introduction and another idea,
Yakov Shafranovich
- Re: [Asrg] Introduction and another idea,
Vernon Schryver
- RE: [Asrg] Introduction and another idea,
Bob Wyman
- RE: [Asrg] Introduction and another idea,
Vernon Schryver
- RE: [Asrg] Introduction and another idea,
Yakov Shafranovich
- RE: [Asrg] Introduction and another idea,
Vernon Schryver
- [Asrg] Introduction and another idea,
Selby Hatch
- Re: [Asrg] Introduction and another idea,
Vernon Schryver
- Re: [Asrg] Introduction and another idea,
Selby Hatch
- Re: [Asrg] Introduction and another idea,
Benjamin Geer
- Re: [Asrg] Introduction and another idea,
Vernon Schryver
- Re: [Asrg] Introduction and another idea,
Benjamin Geer
- Re: [Asrg] Introduction and another idea,
Vernon Schryver
- Re: [Asrg] Introduction and another idea,
Benjamin Geer
- Re: [Asrg] Introduction and another idea,
Vernon Schryver
- Re: [Asrg] Introduction and another idea,
Jon Kyme
- Re: [Asrg] Introduction and another idea,
Steven F Siirila
- Re: [Asrg] Introduction and another idea,
Kee Hinckley
- Re: [Asrg] Introduction and another idea,
Vernon Schryver
- Re: [Asrg] Introduction and another idea,
Benjamin Geer
- Re: [Asrg] Introduction and another idea,
Vernon Schryver
- Re: [Asrg] Introduction and another idea,
Yakov Shafranovich
- RE: [Asrg] Introduction and another idea,
Bob Wyman
- Re: [Asrg] Introduction and another idea,
Benjamin Geer
- Re: [Asrg] Introduction and another idea,
Vernon Schryver
- Re: [Asrg] Introduction and another idea,
Benjamin Geer
- Re: [Asrg] Introduction and another idea,
Kee Hinckley
- Re: [Asrg] Introduction and another idea,
Vernon Schryver
- Re: [Asrg] Introduction and another idea,
mathew
- Re: [Asrg] Introduction and another idea,
Vernon Schryver
- Re: [Asrg] Introduction and another idea,
mathew
- Re: [Asrg] Introduction and another idea,
Bruce Stephens
- Re: [Asrg] Introduction and another idea,
Vernon Schryver
- Re: [Asrg] Introduction and another idea,
mathew
- RE: [Asrg] Introduction and another idea,
Bob Wyman
- RE: [Asrg] Introduction and another idea,
Vernon Schryver
- RE: [Asrg] Introduction and another idea,
Kee Hinckley
- Re: [Asrg] Introduction and another idea,
Kee Hinckley
- Re: [Asrg] Introduction and another idea,
Vernon Schryver
- Re: [Asrg] Introduction and another idea,
Kee Hinckley
- RE: [Asrg] Introduction and another idea,
Bob Wyman
- Re: [Asrg] Introduction and another idea,
Yakov Shafranovich
- Re: [Asrg] Introduction and another idea,
Vernon Schryver
- RE: [Asrg] Introduction and another idea,
gep2
- RE: [Asrg] Introduction and another idea,
gep2
- Re: [Asrg] Introduction and another idea,
gep2
- Re: [Asrg] Introduction and another idea,
Vernon Schryver
Re: [Asrg] ASRG IPR policy (was RE: US Spam patents: Partial list ),
Vern Paxson
[Asrg] 6.I Spam elimination by mailbox lock and key,
Selby Hatch
[Asrg] Join ASRG and display your email address for the spammers!!,
Shannon Jacobs
[Asrg] appropriate to meet/present at ISPCON Fall?,
Peter Kay
[Asrg] RE: ASRG IPR policy (was RE: US Spam patents: Partial list),
Peter Kay
[Asrg] ASRG IPR policy (was RE: US Spam patents: Partial list),
Paul Judge
[Asrg] MailBlocks and ASRG,
Yakov Shafranovich
[Asrg] Statistical Analysis shows SPF should work Pretty Well,
Meng Weng Wong
- Re: [Asrg] Statistical Analysis shows SPF should work Pretty Well,
Kee Hinckley
- Re: [Asrg] Statistical Analysis shows SPF should work Pretty Well,
Vernon Schryver
- Re: [Asrg] Statistical Analysis shows SPF should work Pretty Well,
Yakov Shafranovich
- Re: [Asrg] Statistical Analysis shows SPF should work Pretty Well,
Barry Shein
- [Asrg] Spammer responses to SPF,
Meng Weng Wong
- Re: [Asrg] Spammer responses to SPF,
Yakov Shafranovich
- Re: [Asrg] Spammer responses to SPF,
Alan DeKok
- Re: [Asrg] Spammer responses to SPF,
Yakov Shafranovich
- [Asrg] SPF: Summary of Objections,
Meng Weng Wong
- [Asrg] Re: SPF: Summary of Objections, erratum,
Meng Weng Wong
- [Asrg] Re: SPF: Objection 5,
Meng Weng Wong
- [Asrg] Re: SPF: Objection 8,
Meng Weng Wong
- Re: [Asrg] Re: SPF: Objection 8,
Barry Shein
- [Asrg] Re: SPF: Objection 8,
Jon Kyme
- [Asrg] Re: SPF: Objection 7,
Meng Weng Wong
- Re: [Asrg] Re: SPF: Objection 7,
Barry Shein
- [Asrg] Re: SPF: Objections 1 and 2,
Meng Weng Wong
- [Asrg] Increase in spoofed spam using bogus sender,
Eric Dean
- [Asrg] Re: SPF: Objection 9,
Meng Weng Wong
- [Asrg] Re: SPF: Objection 9,
Jon Kyme
- [Asrg] Re: SPF: Objection 6,
Meng Weng Wong
- [Asrg] Re: SPF: Objections 3 and 4,
Meng Weng Wong
- Re: [Asrg] SPF: Summary of Objections,
Vernon Schryver
- Re: [Asrg] SPF: Summary of Objections,
Dave Crocker
- Re: [Asrg] SPF: Summary of Objections,
Dave Crocker
- Re: [Asrg] Spammer responses to SPF,
Markus Stumpf
- [Asrg] SPF: Objection: spammers will use <>,
Meng Weng Wong
- Re: [Asrg] SPF: Objection: spammers will use <>,
Markus Stumpf
- Re: [Asrg] SPF: Objection: spammers will use <>,
Yakov Shafranovich
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [Asrg] Statistical Analysis shows SPF should work Pretty Well,
Yakov Shafranovich
[Asrg] News Article - Court denies Mailblocks' injunction request,
Yakov Shafranovich
[Asrg] good example of ASRG proposal?,
Peter Kay
[Asrg] News Article - Stealing IP address ownership to send spam,
Yakov Shafranovich
[Asrg] RMX+DMP = SPF: a technical approach,
Meng Weng Wong
[Asrg] US Spam patents: Partial list,
Bob Wyman
- Re: [Asrg] US Spam patents: Partial list,
Yakov Shafranovich
- RE: [Asrg] US Spam patents: Partial list,
Bob Wyman
- RE: [Asrg] US Spam patents: Partial list,
Bob Wyman
- RE: [Asrg] US Spam patents: Partial list,
Bob Wyman
- RE: [Asrg] US Spam patents: Partial list,
Bob Wyman
- RE: [Asrg] US Spam patents: Partial list,
Bob Wyman
- RE: [Asrg] US Spam patents: Partial list,
Bob Wyman
- RE: [Asrg] US Spam patents: Partial list,
Bob Wyman
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: [Asrg] US Spam patents: Partial list,
Peter Kay
- RE: [Asrg] US Spam patents: Partial list,
Peter Kay
- RE: [Asrg] US Spam patents: Partial list,
Peter Kay
- RE: [Asrg] US Spam patents: Partial list,
Peter Kay
- RE: [Asrg] US Spam patents: Partial list,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: [Asrg] US Spam patents: Partial list,
Peter Kay
- RE: [Asrg] US Spam patents: Partial list,
Yakov Shafranovich
- RE: [Asrg] US Spam patents: Partial list,
Paul Judge
[Asrg] News Article - Testing for humans when SENDING emails,
Yakov Shafranovich
[Asrg] List of current anti-spam headers?,
Yakov Shafranovich
[Asrg] Spam in Action - NYTimes on Iraqi Card Decks,
Kee Hinckley
Reaching consensus on 'what is spam' (Was RE: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"...),
Paul Judge
[Asrg] IPR Document Update,
Yakov Shafranovich
[Asrg] Re: economics of spam,
Shannon Jacobs
[Asrg] Hotmail used for scripted spam (from SlashDot),
Yakov Shafranovich
[Asrg] Forbes Survey of Anti-Spam methods and products,
Bob Wyman
[Asrg] now we're on stage,
Peter Kay
RE: [Asrg] criteria for spam V2,
Peter Kay
RE: [Asrg] criteria for spam V2 (was: Implicit Consent (was: Another criteria for "what is spam"...)),
Peter Kay
[Asrg] IPR Document updated,
Yakov Shafranovich
RE: [Asrg] Implicit Consent (was: Another criteria for "what is spam"...),
Peter Kay
Re: [Asrg] Implicit Consent (was: Another criteria for "what isspam"...),
Bill Cole
[Asrg] Spam as a symptom of sender/recipient imbalance.,
Rob Cameron
[Asrg] Spam by industry sector,
Matt Sergeant
RE: [Asrg] CRI Header,
Eric D. Williams
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [Asrg] CRI Header,
Yakov Shafranovich
- RE: [Asrg] CRI Header,
Yakov Shafranovich
- RE: [Asrg] CRI Header,
Eric D. Williams
- Re: [Asrg] CRI Header,
Yakov Shafranovich
- RE: [Asrg] CRI Header,
Eric D. Williams
- Re: [Asrg] CRI Header,
Yakov Shafranovich
- RE: [Asrg] CRI Header,
bukys
- RE: [Asrg] CRI Header,
Eric Dean
- RE: [Asrg] CRI Header,
Yakov Shafranovich
- RE: [Asrg] CRI Header,
Peter Kay
- RE: [Asrg] CRI Header,
Yakov Shafranovich
- RE: [Asrg] CRI Header,
Eric D. Williams
- RE: [Asrg] CRI Header,
Eric D. Williams
- RE: [Asrg] CRI Header,
Eric D. Williams
- RE: [Asrg] CRI Header,
Yakov Shafranovich
- RE: [Asrg] CRI Header,
Eric D. Williams
- RE: [Asrg] CRI Header,
Eric D. Williams
[Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"...,
Barry Shein
Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"...,
Dave Crocker
Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"...,
Dave Aronson
Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"...,
Art Pollard
Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"...,
mathew
<Possible follow-ups>
RE: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"...,
Peter Kay
RE: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"...,
Eric D. Williams
RE: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"...,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
RE: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"...,
Yakov Shafranovich
RE: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"...,
Peter Kay
RE: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"...,
Bill Cole
RE: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"...,
Peter Kay
Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"...,
kent
RE: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"...,
Peter Kay
RE: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"...,
Peter Kay
- RE: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"...,
Barry Shein
- Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"...,
Dave Aronson
- Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"...,
C. Wegrzyn
- Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"...,
Vernon Schryver
- Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"...,
Barry Shein
- Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"...,
Vernon Schryver
- Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"...,
mathew
- Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"...,
waltdnes
- Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"...,
Vernon Schryver
- Message not available
- Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"...,
Dave Aronson
- Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"...,
Barry Shein
- Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"...,
Barry Shein
- Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"...,
mathew
RE: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"...,
Peter Kay
RE: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"...,
Peter Kay
RE: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"...,
Peter Kay
RE: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"...,
Eric D. Williams
RE: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"...,
Peter Kay
RE: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"...,
Peter Kay
RE: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"...,
Bill Cole
RE: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"...,
Beadles, Mark A
Re: [Asrg] CRI Header [correction],
Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] Short-term versus Long-term focus: A bit of economics,
John Fenley
RE: [Asrg] Re: Tracking patent claims - please also track evidence of previous work.,
Peter Kay
RE: Short-term versus Long-term focus: A bit of economics ( was: RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (..."improves" C/R utility?)),
Eric D. Williams
Re: [Asrg] Re: Tracking patent claims - please also track evidence of previous work.,
Scott Nelson
[Asrg] Re: Tracking patent claims - please also track evidence ofprevious work.,
Yakov Shafranovich
[Asrg] Tracking patent claims - please also track evidence of previous work.,
David Wheeler
[Asrg] RMX: New draft and implementation,
Hadmut Danisch
[Asrg] Whitelist conforming definition,
Eric D. Williams
Re: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (..."improves" C/R utility?),
John Fenley
RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?),
Yakov Shafranovich
RE: [Asrg] The level of discourse has degenerated... It ain't useful.,
Paul Judge
[Asrg] IP cross post (interesting RMX reception...),
Eric D. Williams
[Asrg] 3. Volunteers to work on Requirements,
Eric D. Williams
RE: ADV: (was Re: [Asrg] Article - New anti-spam proposal in the House of Representative),
Eric D. Williams
RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?),
Bob Wyman
Re: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?),
Yakov Shafranovich
- Re: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?),
Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?),
Peter Kay
- Re: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?),
Yakov Shafranovich
- RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?),
Peter Kay
- RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?),
Eric D. Williams
- RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?),
Eric D. Williams
- RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?),
Eric D. Williams
- RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?),
Eric D. Williams
- RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?),
Scott Nelson
- RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?),
Eric D. Williams
- RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?),
Eric D. Williams
- RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?),
Yakov Shafranovich
[Asrg] RE: TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?),
Peter Kay
- Re: [Asrg] RE: TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?),
Richard Rognlie
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: [Asrg] RE: TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?),
Peter Kay
- RE: [Asrg] RE: TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?),
Peter Kay
- RE: [Asrg] RE: TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?),
Peter Kay
- Re: [Asrg] Re: TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?),
Scott Nelson
- Re: [Asrg] Re: TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?),
Scott Nelson
- RE: [Asrg] Re: TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?),
Eric D. Williams
- Re: [Asrg] Re: TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?),
Scott Nelson
- RE: [Asrg] Re: TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?),
Eric D. Williams
- Re: [Asrg] Re: TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?),
Scott Nelson
RE: [Asrg] (Position): Successful anti-spam techniques must avoid software patents,
Peter Kay
[Asrg] Choicelist,
John Fenley
[Asrg] Standard headers for anti-spam systems,
Yakov Shafranovich
[Asrg] News Article - ASRG Slashdotted,
Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] Patents and ASRG (was (Position): Successful anti-spam techniques must avoid software patents),
Yakov Shafranovich
[Asrg] (Position): Successful anti-spam techniques must avoid software patents,
David Wheeler
Mail converted by MHonArc
