Anti-Spam Research Group Discussion Archive - Thread Index

[Prev Page] [Next Page] [Date Index] [IETF Announcements Archive]

Re: [Asrg] [1] Why SPAM is worse in SMTP than in other protocols, (continued)
- Re: [Asrg] [1] Why SPAM is worse in SMTP than in other protocols, mathew
  - Re: [Asrg] [1] Why SPAM is worse in SMTP than in other protocols, J C Lawrence
- Forgery in SMTP (was [Asrg] [1] Why SPAM is worse in SMTP than inother protocols), Philip Miller
  - Re: Forgery in SMTP (was [Asrg] [1] Why SPAM is worse in SMTP than in other protocols), Alan DeKok
    - Re: Forgery in SMTP (was [Asrg] [1] Why SPAM is worse in SMTP than in other protocols), Walter Dnes
    - [Asrg] Re: 03.1 Re: Forgery in SMTP (applying flame retardent), Matthew Elvey
    - Re: [Asrg] Re: 03.1 Re: Forgery in SMTP (applying flame retardent), Walter Dnes
    - Re: [Asrg] Re: 03.1 Re: Forgery in SMTP (applying flame retardent), Alan DeKok
    - [Asrg] 6, Proposals - SMTP Envelope Verification vs. Message Verification, Yakov Shafranovich
- Re: [Asrg] [1] Why SPAM is worse in SMTP than in other protocols, ipeter at bigpond.net.au
  - Re: [Asrg] [1] Why SPAM is worse in SMTP than in other protocols, Alan DeKok
    - Re: [Asrg] [1] Why SPAM is worse in SMTP than in other protocols, Za'mbori, Zolta'n
    - Re: [Asrg] [1] Why SPAM is worse in SMTP than in other protocols, Alan DeKok
    - Re: [Asrg] [1] Why SPAM is worse in SMTP than in other protocols, Markus Stumpf
    - Re: [Asrg] [1] Why SPAM is worse in SMTP than in other protocols, Alan DeKok
    - Re: [Asrg] [1] Why SPAM is worse in SMTP than in other protocols, Markus Stumpf
    - Re: [Asrg] [1] Why SPAM is worse in SMTP than in other protocols, Yakov Shafranovich
    - Re: [Asrg] [1] Why SPAM is worse in SMTP than in other protocols, Jon Kyme
    - [Asrg] Re: [1] Why SPAM is worse in SMTP than in other protocols, Za'mbori, Zolta'n

Mail converted by MHonArc