Anti-Spam Research Group Discussion Archive - Thread Index

• Re: [Asrg] Let's try something different, (continued)
  • Re: [Asrg] Let's try something different, Joe St Sauver
  • Re: [Asrg] Let's try something different, Wes Peters
  • Re: [Asrg] Let's try something different, Matt Sergeant
  • RE: [Asrg] Let's try something different, Clayton, Nik [IT]
• [Asrg] Massive bounce rates on spammer lists, Justin Mason
  • Re: [Asrg] Massive bounce rates on spammer lists, David F. Skoll
    • Re: [Asrg] Massive bounce rates on spammer lists, Chris Lewis
      • Re: [Asrg] Massive bounce rates on spammer lists, David F. Skoll
      • Re: [Asrg] Massive bounce rates on spammer lists, Kee Hinckley
    • Re: [Asrg] Massive bounce rates on spammer lists, Justin Mason
• [Asrg] RE: Asrg digest, Vol 1 #42 - 13 msgs, Tom Thomson
  • Disposable ISP accounts (was Re: [Asrg] RE: Asrg digest, Vol 1 #42- 13 msgs), David F. Skoll
    • Re: Disposable ISP accounts (was Re: [Asrg] RE: Asrg digest, Vol1 #42 - 13 msgs), Chris Lewis
    • Re: Disposable ISP accounts (was Re: [Asrg] RE: Asrg digest, Vol 1 #42 - 13 msgs), Chris Fedde
• [Asrg] The Traveling Salesman SMTP problem, wayne
  • Re: [Asrg] The Traveling Salesman SMTP problem, Hadmut Danisch
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Asrg] The Traveling Salesman SMTP problem, Dr. Jeffrey Race
    • Re: [Asrg] The Traveling Salesman SMTP problem, wayne
• [Asrg] Do we need to do anything?, Clayton, Nik [IT]
  • Re: [Asrg] Do we need to do anything?, Jon Kyme
  • Limitations of filters (was Re: [Asrg] Do we need to do anything?), David F. Skoll
    • Re: Limitations of filters (was Re: [Asrg] Do we need to do anything?), wayne
      • Re: Limitations of filters (was Re: [Asrg] Do we need to do anything?), David F. Skoll
      • Re: Limitations of filters (was Re: [Asrg] Do we need to do anything?), Chris Lewis
      • Re: Limitations of filters (was Re: [Asrg] Do we need to do anything?), Alan DeKok
  • Re: [Asrg] Do we need to do anything?, Hadmut Danisch
  • Re: [Asrg] Do we need to do anything?, James McIninch
    • Re: [Asrg] Do we need to do anything?, Matt Sergeant
      • Re: [Asrg] Do we need to do anything?, Jim Youll
      • Re: [Asrg] Do we need to do anything?, Justin Mason
      • Re: [Asrg] Do we need to do anything?, Jim Youll
      • Re: [Asrg] Do we need to do anything?, Kee Hinckley
      • Re: [Asrg] Do we need to do anything?, Chris Lewis
      • Re: [Asrg] Do we need to do anything?, william
      • Re: [Asrg] Do we need to do anything?, Kee Hinckley
      • Re: [Asrg] Do we need to do anything?, Jim Youll
      • Re: [Asrg] Do we need to do anything?, Kee Hinckley
      • Re: [Asrg] Do we need to do anything?, Jim Youll
      • Re: [Asrg] Do we need to do anything?, Jim Youll
      • Re: [Asrg] Do we need to do anything?, Matt Sergeant
      • Re: [Asrg] Do we need to do anything?, Jim Youll
      • Re: [Asrg] Do we need to do anything?, David F. Skoll
      • Re: [Asrg] Do we need to do anything?, Matt Sergeant
      • Re: [Asrg] Do we need to do anything?, Chris Fedde
      • Re: [Asrg] Do we need to do anything?, David F. Skoll
      • [Asrg] Locked addresses (was Do we need to do anything?, David F. Skoll
      • Re: [Asrg] Locked addresses (was Do we need to do anything?, Kee Hinckley
      • Re: [Asrg] Locked addresses (was Do we need to do anything?, David F. Skoll
      • Re: [Asrg] Locked addresses (was Do we need to do anything?, Kee Hinckley
      • Re: [Asrg] Locked addresses (was Do we need to do anything?, David F. Skoll
      • Re: [Asrg] Locked addresses (was Do we need to do anything?, Mark Delany
      • Re: [Asrg] Locked addresses (was Do we need to do anything?, Kee Hinckley
      • Re: [Asrg] Locked addresses (was Do we need to do anything?, David F. Skoll
      • Re: [Asrg] Locked addresses (was Do we need to do anything?, Kee Hinckley
      • Re: [Asrg] Locked addresses (was Do we need to do anything?, David F. Skoll
      • Re: [Asrg] Locked addresses (was Do we need to do anything?, Kee Hinckley
      • RE: [Asrg] Locked addresses (was Do we need to do anything?, Gary Feldman
      • Re: [Asrg] Locked addresses (was Do we need to do anything?, Hadmut Danisch
      • Re: [Asrg] Locked addresses (was Do we need to do anything?, Justin Mason
    • Re: [Asrg] Do we need to do anything?, wayne
  • Re: [Asrg] Do we need to do anything?, Nate W
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [Asrg] Do we need to do anything?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• [Asrg] RE: Asrg digest, Vol 1 #32 - 9 msgs, Tom Thomson
  • [Asrg] RE: Asrg digest, Vol 1 #32 - 9 msgs, Kee Hinckley
    • RE: [Asrg] RE: Asrg digest, Vol 1 #32 - 9 msgs, Tom Thomson
      • RE: [Asrg] RE: Asrg digest, Vol 1 #32 - 9 msgs, Kee Hinckley
• Keith, Hadmut both right RE: [Asrg] Deprecating plain POP accounts, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
  • [Asrg] DNSSEC has it's own deployment problems (Re: Keith, Hadmut both right), Adam Back
• [Asrg] RE: Requirements for source tracking, Tom Thomson
• [Asrg] Declaration to the world, Hadmut Danisch
  • Re: [Asrg] Declaration to the world, Keith Moore
    • Re: [Asrg] Declaration to the world, william
      • Re: [Asrg] Declaration to the world, Keith Moore
      • Re: [Asrg] Declaration to the world, william
  • Re: [Asrg] Declaration to the world, Jon Kyme
    • Re: [Asrg] Declaration to the world, Hadmut Danisch
      • Re: [Asrg] Declaration to the world, Jon Kyme
      • Re: [Asrg] Declaration to the world, Hadmut Danisch
      • Re: [Asrg] Declaration to the world, Keith Moore
      • Re: [Asrg] Declaration to the world, wayne
      • Re: [Asrg] Declaration to the world, Matt Sergeant
      • Re: [Asrg] Declaration to the world, Hadmut Danisch
      • Re: [Asrg] Declaration to the world, Matt Sergeant
      • Re: [Asrg] Declaration to the world, Adam Back
      • Re: [Asrg] Declaration to the world, Keith Moore
      • Re: [Asrg] Declaration to the world, wayne
      • Re: [Asrg] Declaration to the world, Jon Kyme
      • Re: [Asrg] Declaration to the world, Hadmut Danisch
      • [Asrg] RMX breaks mailing lists, Liudvikas Bukys
      • Re: [Asrg] RMX breaks mailing lists (not necessarily), David F. Skoll
      • Re: [Asrg] RMX breaks mailing lists, Derek J. Balling
      • Re: [Asrg] RMX breaks mailing lists, Liudvikas Bukys
  • Re: [Asrg] Declaration to the world, Pierre BRUA
    • Re: [Asrg] Declaration to the world, Chris Lewis
      • RMX method validity and alternatives (was Re: [Asrg] Declarationto the world), Pierre BRUA
  • pros and cons of RMX (Re: [Asrg] Declaration to the world), Adam Back
    • Re: pros and cons of RMX (Re: [Asrg] Declaration to the world), wayne
      • Re: pros and cons of RMX (Re: [Asrg] Declaration to the world), Chris Lewis
      • Re: pros and cons of RMX (Re: [Asrg] Declaration to the world), Adam Back
      • Re: pros and cons of RMX (Re: [Asrg] Declaration to the world), Chris Lewis
      • Re: pros and cons of RMX (Re: [Asrg] Declaration to the world), Adam Back
    • Re: pros and cons of RMX (Re: [Asrg] Declaration to the world), wayne
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [Asrg] Declaration to the world, Sauer, Damon
  • RE: [Asrg] Declaration to the world, Sauer, Damon
• [Asrg] dsprotocol and Underscores in DNS node names, Gordon Fecyk - Home
• [Asrg] Back to the charter, Gary Feldman
  • Re: [Asrg] Back to the charter, Alan DeKok
    • Re: [Asrg] Back to the charter, Pierre Fortin
      • Re: [Asrg] Back to the charter, Kee Hinckley
  • Re: [Asrg] Back to the charter, Mark Delany
    • Re: [Asrg] Back to the charter, Nate W
  • Re: [Asrg] Back to the charter, Jon Kyme
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [Asrg] Back to the charter, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• [Asrg] Anonymity and freedom of expression, David F. Skoll
• [Asrg] My Suggestion - HashCash + whitelist/auth, ietf
  • Re: [Asrg] My Suggestion - HashCash + whitelist/auth, Adam Back
    • Re: [Asrg] My Suggestion - HashCash + whitelist/auth, Vernon Schryver
• [Asrg] Summarizing, Kee Hinckley
  • Re: [Asrg] Summarizing, Keith Moore
    • Re: [Asrg] Summarizing, Kee Hinckley
• Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records), Vernon Schryver
  • Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records), Alan DeKok
    • Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records), David F. Skoll
      • Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records), Alan DeKok
      • Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records), william
      • Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records), David F. Skoll
      • Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records), Vernon Schryver
      • Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records), Alan DeKok
      • Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records), David F. Skoll
      • Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records), Alan DeKok
      • Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records), Chris Lewis
      • Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records), Alan DeKok
      • Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records), Keith Moore
      • Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records), David Jameson
      • Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records), Keith Moore
      • Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records), David Jameson
      • Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records), Keith Moore
      • Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records), Jim Youll
      • Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records), Keith Moore
      • Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records), Jim Youll
      • Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records), wayne
      • Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records), Keith Moore
      • Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records), Vernon Schryver
      • Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records), Chris Fedde
      • Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records), Keith Moore
      • Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records), Vernon Schryver
      • Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records), Kee Hinckley
      • Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records), Chris Lewis
      • Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records), Alan DeKok
      • Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records), Nate W
      • Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records), Chris Fedde
      • Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records), Keith Moore
      • RE: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records), Gary Feldman
      • Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records), Keith Moore
      • Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records), Chris Fedde
      • Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records), Chris Lewis
      • Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records), Alan DeKok
      • Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records), Chris Lewis
  • Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records), Chris Lewis
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records), Clayton, Nik [IT]
  • Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records), Joe St Sauver
  • Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records), Balachander Krishnamurthy
  • RE: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records), Hallam-Baker, Phillip
    • Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records), Keith Moore
    • RE: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records), Matt Sergeant
      • Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records), John Kodis
      • Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records), Matt Sergeant
      • Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records), Keith Moore
• [Asrg] Time for the ISPs to fight back!, Richard
  • Re: [Asrg] Time for the ISPs to fight back!, Peter A. Friend
    • Message not available
      • Re: [Asrg] Time for the ISPs to fight back!, Peter A. Friend
  • Re: [Asrg] Time for the ISPs to fight back!, Kee Hinckley
    • Re: [Asrg] Time for the ISPs to fight back!, Clifton Royston
      • Re: [Asrg] Time for the ISPs to fight back!, Keith Moore
      • Patents (was Re: [Asrg] Time for the ISPs to fight back!), David F. Skoll
      • Re: Patents (was Re: [Asrg] Time for the ISPs to fight back!), Clifton Royston
      • Re: Patents (was Re: [Asrg] Time for the ISPs to fight back!), Keith Moore
      • Re: Patents (was Re: [Asrg] Time for the ISPs to fight back!), Keith Moore
      • Re: Patents (was Re: [Asrg] Time for the ISPs to fight back!), Clifton Royston
      • Re: Patents (was Re: [Asrg] Time for the ISPs to fight back!), Keith Moore
      • RE: Patents (was Re: [Asrg] Time for the ISPs to fight back!), Bob Wyman
      • Re: Patents (was Re: [Asrg] Time for the ISPs to fight back!), David F. Skoll
      • Re: Patents (was Re: [Asrg] Time for the ISPs to fight back!), Rod Gilchrist
      • RE: Patents (was Re: [Asrg] Time for the ISPs to fight back!), Bob Wyman
      • Re: [Asrg] Time for the ISPs to fight back!, Kee Hinckley
      • Re: [Asrg] Time for the ISPs to fight back!, David F. Skoll
      • Re: [Asrg] Time for the ISPs to fight back!, Keith Moore
  • Re: [Asrg] Time for the ISPs to fight back!, Fred Baker
• [Asrg] Usefulness or otherwise of RMX records, Tom Thomson
• [Asrg] How to can the spam, Jason Hihn
  • Re: [Asrg] How to can the spam, Kee Hinckley
    • Re: [Asrg] How to can the spam, Pierre Fortin
• [Asrg] well is this a good idea ?!, Alex Curvers
  • RE: [Asrg] well is this a good idea ?!, Jason Hihn
• [Asrg] new to the list..., Pierre Fortin
  • Re: [Asrg] new to the list..., Justin Mason
• [Asrg] All mail is anonymous (and, therein lies much of the problem), Bob Wyman
  • Re: [Asrg] All mail is anonymous (and, therein lies much of the problem), Hadmut Danisch
• [Asrg] Re: More advertising crap, Fred Baker
  • Re: [Asrg] Re: More advertising crap, Clifton Royston
  • Re: [Asrg] Re: More advertising crap, Matt Sergeant
  • RE: [Asrg] Re: More advertising crap, Jason Hihn
  • [Asrg] Re: More advertising crap, Kee Hinckley
  • Re: [Asrg] Re: More advertising crap, Chris Lewis
• [Asrg] Multiple Suggestions, Sauer, Damon
  • Re: [Asrg] Multiple Suggestions, Keith Moore
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [Asrg] Multiple Suggestions, Sauer, Damon
    • Re: [Asrg] Multiple Suggestions, Keith Moore
  • RE: [Asrg] Multiple Suggestions, Sauer, Damon
    • Re: [Asrg] Multiple Suggestions, Keith Moore
• [Asrg] SHEESH!, Vernon Schryver
  • Re: [Asrg] SHEESH!, Chris Lewis
    • Re: [Asrg] SHEESH!, Vernon Schryver
      • Re: [Asrg] SHEESH!, Chris Lewis
      • Re: [Asrg] SHEESH!, Kee Hinckley
      • Re: [Asrg] SHEESH!, Vernon Schryver
      • Re: [Asrg] SHEESH!, Chris Lewis
      • Re: [Asrg] SHEESH!, Vernon Schryver
  • [Asrg] Re: SHEESH!, Fred Baker
• [Asrg] RE: Standardization of RFC headers for email content, don_zawada
  • Re: [Asrg] RE: Standardization of RFC headers for email content, Matt Sergeant
• [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, David F. Skoll
  • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Keith Moore
    • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, David F. Skoll
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Mathias Herberts
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, David F. Skoll
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Jim Youll
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, David F. Skoll
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Keith Moore
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, David F. Skoll
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Keith Moore
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, David F. Skoll
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Keith Moore
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Justin Mason
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Keith Moore
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, David F. Skoll
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Keith Moore
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Chris Lewis
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, David F. Skoll
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Chris Lewis
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, David F. Skoll
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Chris Lewis
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Mark Delany
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Kee Hinckley
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Vernon Schryver
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, David F. Skoll
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Chris Lewis
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, David F. Skoll
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Vernon Schryver
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Deven T. Corzine
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, David F. Skoll
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Brad Templeton
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, David F. Skoll
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Vernon Schryver
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, David F. Skoll
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, David F. Skoll
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Jim Youll
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, David F. Skoll
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Vernon Schryver
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, David F. Skoll
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Justin Mason
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Chris Lewis
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Keith Moore
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, David F. Skoll
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Keith Moore
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, David F. Skoll
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Keith Moore
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, David F. Skoll
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Jim Youll
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Keith Moore
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, David F. Skoll
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Keith Moore
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, David F. Skoll
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Keith Moore
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, David F. Skoll
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Keith Moore
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Daniel Feenberg
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Chris Lewis
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, David F. Skoll
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Chris Lewis
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Mark Delany
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Chris Lewis
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, David F. Skoll
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Deven T. Corzine
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Vernon Schryver
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Chris Lewis
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Nate W
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Kee Hinckley
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Chris Lewis
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Matt Sergeant
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Vernon Schryver
    • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Matt Sergeant
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Keith Moore
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Matt Sergeant
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Keith Moore
  • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Justin Mason
    • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Bill Yerazunis
    • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Vernon Schryver
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, David F. Skoll
  • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Kee Hinckley
    • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, David F. Skoll
      • Message not available
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Kee Hinckley
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Alan DeKok
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Mark Delany
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Chris Lewis
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Jacqui Caren
    • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, David F. Skoll
    • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Keith Moore
  • RE: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Sauer, Damon
    • RE: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, David F. Skoll
  • RE: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Sauer, Damon
• [Asrg] Abstract of proposed Internet Draft for Best Current Practice (please comment), Dr. Jeffrey Race
• [Asrg] Sender pays vs the third world, Matt Sergeant
  • Re: [Asrg] Sender pays vs the third world, Eric S. Johansson
    • Re: [Asrg] Sender pays vs the third world, Matt Sergeant
      • Re: [Asrg] Sender pays vs the third world, Eric S. Johansson
      • Re: [Asrg] Sender pays vs the third world, Vernon Schryver
  • Re: [Asrg] Sender pays vs the third world, Kee Hinckley
• [Asrg] Deprecating plain POP accounts, Hadmut Danisch
  • Re: [Asrg] Deprecating plain POP accounts, Alan DeKok
    • Re: [Asrg] Deprecating plain POP accounts, Keith Moore
      • Re: [Asrg] Deprecating plain POP accounts, Alan DeKok
      • Re: [Asrg] Deprecating plain POP accounts, Keith Moore
      • Re: [Asrg] Deprecating plain POP accounts, Hadmut Danisch
      • Re: [Asrg] Deprecating plain POP accounts, Keith Moore
      • Re: [Asrg] Deprecating plain POP accounts, Hadmut Danisch
      • Re: [Asrg] Deprecating plain POP accounts, Keith Moore
      • Re: [Asrg] Deprecating plain POP accounts, Hadmut Danisch
      • Re: [Asrg] Deprecating plain POP accounts, Keith Moore
      • Re: [Asrg] Deprecating plain POP accounts, Hadmut Danisch
      • Re: [Asrg] Deprecating plain POP accounts, Alan DeKok
      • Re: [Asrg] Deprecating plain POP accounts, Keith Moore
      • Re: [Asrg] Deprecating plain POP accounts, Alan DeKok
      • Re: [Asrg] Deprecating plain POP accounts, Keith Moore
      • Re: [Asrg] Deprecating plain POP accounts, Alan DeKok
      • Re: [Asrg] Deprecating plain POP accounts, Keith Moore
      • Re: [Asrg] Deprecating plain POP accounts, Alan DeKok
      • Re: [Asrg] Deprecating plain POP accounts, Keith Moore
      • Re: [Asrg] Deprecating plain POP accounts, abuse
      • Re: [Asrg] Deprecating plain POP accounts, Hadmut Danisch
      • Re: [Asrg] Deprecating plain POP accounts, abuse
      • RE: [Asrg] Deprecating plain POP accounts, Gary Feldman
      • Re: [Asrg] Deprecating plain POP accounts, Keith Moore
      • Re: [Asrg] Deprecating plain POP accounts, Hadmut Danisch
    • Re: [Asrg] Deprecating plain POP accounts, Hadmut Danisch
  • Re: [Asrg] Deprecating plain POP accounts, Kee Hinckley
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Asrg] Deprecating plain POP accounts, Raymie Stata
    • Re: [Asrg] Deprecating plain POP accounts, Hadmut Danisch
• [Asrg] Getting spammers on a blacklist, curvers
• [Asrg] (no subject), curvers
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [Asrg] (no subject), Mark McCarron
    • RE: [Asrg] (no subject), Danny Angus
  • RE: [Asrg] (no subject), Mark McCarron
    • RE: *Suspected Spam *RE: [Asrg] (no subject), Danny Angus
    • RE: [Asrg] (no subject), Yakov Shafranovich
  • [Asrg] (no subject), Patrick Galvin
  • [Asrg] (no subject), John Fenley
  • [Asrg] (no subject), Kurt Magnusson
  • [Asrg] (no subject), Kurt Magnusson
  • [Asrg] (no subject), Richard Willey
  • Re: [Asrg] (no subject), John Levine
    • Re: [Asrg] (no subject), Barry Shein
  • RE: [Asrg] (no subject), Hallam-Baker, Phillip
    • Re: [Asrg] (no subject), Devdas Bhagat
  • RE: [Asrg] (no subject), Hallam-Baker, Phillip
  • RE: [Asrg] (no subject), Hallam-Baker, Phillip
    • The end result of E-postage (was Re: [Asrg] (no subject) ), Alan DeKok
    • RE: [Asrg] (no subject), Barry Shein
  • RE: [Asrg] (no subject), Hallam-Baker, Phillip
    • RE: [Asrg] (no subject), Barry Shein
      • Re: [Asrg] (no subject), Roger B.A. Klorese
      • Re: [Asrg] (no subject), Barry Shein
      • Re: [Asrg] (no subject), \"Roger B.A. Klorese \"
      • Re: [Asrg] (no subject), Barry Shein
      • Re: [Asrg] (no subject), Roger B.A. Klorese
      • Re: [Asrg] (no subject), Barry Shein
      • Re: [Asrg] (no subject), \"Roger B.A. Klorese\"
      • [Asrg] E-postage from first principles, John Levine
      • Re: [Asrg] E-postage from first principles, Jonathan Morton
      • Re: [Asrg] E-postage from first principles, John Levine
      • Re: [Asrg] E-postage from first principles, Jonathan Morton
      • Re: [Asrg] 3 (Message Verification) - Viability of hashcash-based signatures (was: E-postage from first principles), Jonathan Morton
      • [Asrg] Consent protocols - was E-postage, David Maxwell
      • [Asrg] Re: Consent protocols - was E-postage, John Levine
      • [Asrg] Re: Consent protocols - was E-postage, David Maxwell
      • [Asrg] Re: Consent protocols - was E-postage, John Levine
      • [Asrg] Re: Consent protocols - was E-postage, David Maxwell
      • [Asrg] Re: Consent protocols - was E-postage, John Levine
      • [Asrg] Re: Consent protocols - was E-postage, David Maxwell
      • Re: [Asrg] E-postage from first principles, Barry Shein
      • Re: [Asrg] E-postage from first principles, Yakov Shafranovich
  • [Asrg] (no subject), Paul.judge
  • [Asrg] (no subject), Paul Lambert
• [Asrg] Sabotage?, Hadmut Danisch
• [Asrg] Requirements for source tracking, Raymie Stata
  • [Asrg] desirable characteristics of source tracking (was: Requirements forsource tracking), Keith Moore
    • Re: [Asrg] desirable characteristics of source tracking (was: Requirements for source tracking), Hadmut Danisch
      • Re: [Asrg] desirable characteristics of source tracking (was:Requirements for source tracking), Keith Moore
      • Re: [Asrg] desirable characteristics of source tracking (was: Requirements for source tracking), Hadmut Danisch
      • Re: [Asrg] desirable characteristics of source tracking (was:Requirements for source tracking), Keith Moore
      • Re: [Asrg] desirable characteristics of source tracking (was: Requirements for source tracking), Hadmut Danisch
      • Re: [Asrg] desirable characteristics of source tracking (was:Requirements for source tracking), Keith Moore
      • privacy is a feature (Re: [Asrg] desirable characteristics of source tracking), Adam Back
      • [Asrg] Whoops -- list volume is way too high, some principles, Brad Templeton
      • Re: [Asrg] Whoops -- list volume is way too high, some principles, Hadmut Danisch
      • Re: [Asrg] Whoops -- list volume is way too high, some principles, Brad Templeton
      • Spam Laws (was Re: [Asrg] Whoops -- list volume is way too high,some principles), Pierre BRUA
      • Re: [Asrg] Whoops -- list volume is way too high, some principles, Chris Lewis
      • Re: privacy is a feature (Re: [Asrg] desirable characteristics of source tracking), Hadmut Danisch
      • Re: privacy is a feature (Re: [Asrg] desirable characteristics of source tracking), Adam Back
      • Re: privacy is a feature (Re: [Asrg] desirable characteristics of source tracking), Hadmut Danisch
      • Re: privacy is a feature (Re: [Asrg] desirable characteristics ofsource tracking), Keith Moore
      • Re: privacy is a feature (Re: [Asrg] desirable characteristics of source tracking), Hadmut Danisch
      • Re: privacy is a feature (Re: [Asrg] desirable characteristics of source tracking), Clifton Royston
      • Re: privacy is a feature (Re: [Asrg] desirable characteristics of source tracking), Hadmut Danisch
      • Re: privacy is a feature (Re: [Asrg] desirable characteristics ofsource tracking), David F. Skoll
      • Re: privacy is a feature (Re: [Asrg] desirable characteristics of source tracking), Hadmut Danisch
      • Re: privacy is a feature (Re: [Asrg] desirable characteristics ofsource tracking), David F. Skoll
      • Re: privacy is a feature (Re: [Asrg] desirable characteristics of source tracking), Hadmut Danisch
      • Re: privacy is a feature (Re: [Asrg] desirable characteristics of source tracking), Alan DeKok
      • Re: privacy is a feature (Re: [Asrg] desirable characteristics ofsource tracking), Keith Moore
      • Re: privacy is a feature (Re: [Asrg] desirable characteristics of source tracking), Hadmut Danisch
      • Re: privacy is a feature (Re: [Asrg] desirable characteristics ofsource tracking), Chris Lewis
      • Re: privacy is a feature (Re: [Asrg] desirable characteristics ofsource tracking), Keith Moore
      • Re: privacy is a feature (Re: [Asrg] desirable characteristics of source tracking), Hadmut Danisch
      • Re: privacy is a feature (Re: [Asrg] desirable characteristics ofsource tracking), Keith Moore
      • Re: privacy is a feature (Re: [Asrg] desirable characteristics of source tracking), Hadmut Danisch
      • Re: privacy is a feature (Re: [Asrg] desirable characteristics ofsource tracking), Keith Moore
      • Re: privacy is a feature (Re: [Asrg] desirable characteristics of source tracking), Hadmut Danisch
      • Re: privacy is a feature (Re: [Asrg] desirable characteristics of source tracking), Adam Back
      • Re: privacy is a feature (Re: [Asrg] desirable characteristics of source tracking), Hadmut Danisch
      • Re: privacy is a feature (Re: [Asrg] desirable characteristics ofsource tracking), Keith Moore
      • Re: privacy is a feature (Re: [Asrg] desirable characteristics of source tracking), Hadmut Danisch
      • Re: privacy is a feature (Re: [Asrg] desirable characteristics ofsource tracking), Keith Moore
      • Re: privacy is a feature (Re: [Asrg] desirable characteristics of source tracking), Hadmut Danisch
      • Re: privacy is a feature (Re: [Asrg] desirable characteristics of source tracking), wayne
      • Re: privacy is a feature (Re: [Asrg] desirable characteristics ofsource tracking), Chris Lewis
      • Re: privacy is a feature (Re: [Asrg] desirable characteristics of source tracking), Hadmut Danisch
      • [Asrg] RMX provides auth for one-hop only (Re: privacy is a feature), Adam Back
      • [Asrg] Re: RMX provides auth for one-hop only (Re: privacy is a feature), Chris Lewis
      • Re: [Asrg] RMX provides auth for one-hop only (Re: privacy is a feature), wayne
      • Re: privacy is a feature (Re: [Asrg] desirable characteristics of source tracking), Roland
      • Re: privacy is a feature (Re: [Asrg] desirable characteristics of source tracking), Hadmut Danisch
      • Re: privacy is a feature (Re: [Asrg] desirable characteristics ofsource tracking), Keith Moore
      • Re: privacy is a feature (Re: [Asrg] desirable characteristics of source tracking), Adam Back
      • Re: privacy is a feature (Re: [Asrg] desirable characteristics of source tracking), Vernon Schryver
      • Re: privacy is a feature (Re: [Asrg] desirable characteristics ofsource tracking), Keith Moore
      • Re: privacy is a feature (Re: [Asrg] desirable characteristics ofsource tracking), william
      • Re: privacy is a feature (Re: [Asrg] desirable characteristics of source tracking), Hadmut Danisch
      • Re: [Asrg] desirable characteristics of source tracking (was: Requirements for source tracking), Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
      • Re: [Asrg] desirable characteristics of source tracking (was: Requirements for source tracking), Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
      • Re: [Asrg] desirable characteristics of source tracking, Michael Marking
      • Re: [Asrg] desirable characteristics of source tracking, Kee Hinckley
      • Re: [Asrg] desirable characteristics of source tracking, Jim Youll
  • Re: [Asrg] Requirements for source tracking, Kee Hinckley
• Re: [Asrg] MTP drafty, Dr. Jeffrey Race
  • Re: [Asrg] MTP drafty, Brad Templeton
• [Asrg] New Internet Draft I'm working on, Gordon Fecyk - Home
  • Re: [Asrg] New Internet Draft I'm working on, Mariano Absatz
    • RE: [Asrg] DS and Underscores, Gordon Fecyk - Home
• [Asrg] filters play a role, Peter A. Friend
• Re: [Asrg] Standardization of RFC headers for emailcontentanalysis?, Kee Hinckley
  • Re: [Asrg] Standardization of RFC headers for email contentanalysis?, Chris Lewis
• [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's fix it, Shannon Jacobs
  • Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's fix it, Mark Delany
  • Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's fix it, Keith Moore
  • Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's fix it, Brad Templeton
    • Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's fix it, Shannon Jacobs
      • Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's fix it, Mark Delany
      • Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's fix it, Keith Moore
    • Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's fix it, Eric S. Johansson
      • Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's fix it, Brad Templeton
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's fix it, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
    • Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's fix it, Kee Hinckley
      • Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's fix it, Nate W
      • Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's fix it, Kee Hinckley
      • Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's fix it, Nate W
      • Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's fix it, Kee Hinckley
      • Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's fix it, Nate W
      • Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's fix it, Troy Rollo
      • Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's fix it, Nate W
      • Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's fix it, Troy Rollo
      • Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's fix it, Eric S. Johansson
      • Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's fix it, Kee Hinckley
      • Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's fix it, Chris Lewis
      • Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's fix it, Eric S. Johansson
      • Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's fix it, Kee Hinckley
      • Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's fix it, Eric S. Johansson
      • Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's fix it, Kee Hinckley
      • Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's fix it, Eric S. Johansson
      • Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's fix it, Kee Hinckley
      • Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's fix it, Vernon Schryver
      • Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's fix it, Eric S. Johansson
      • Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's fix it, Vernon Schryver
    • Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's fix it, Nate W
  • Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's fix it, Shannon Jacobs
    • Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's fix it, Nate W
      • Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's fix it, Matt Sergeant
      • Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's fix it, wayne
      • Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's fix it, Eric S. Johansson