Anti-Spam Research Group Discussion Archive - Thread Index
[Prev Page] [Next Page] [Date Index]
[IETF Announcements Archive]
- Re: [Asrg] Lets Fix Mailing Lists, (continued)
- Re: [Asrg] Lets Fix Mailing Lists,
Erez Zadok
- Re: [Asrg] Lets Fix Mailing Lists,
Vernon Schryver
- Re: [Asrg] Lets Fix Mailing Lists,
Kee Hinckley
- Re: [Asrg] Lets Fix Mailing Lists,
Hadmut Danisch
- Re: [Asrg] Lets Fix Mailing Lists,
Kee Hinckley
- Re: [Asrg] Lets Fix Mailing Lists,
Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: [Asrg] Lets Fix Mailing Lists,
Kee Hinckley
- Re: [Asrg] Lets Fix Mailing Lists,
Vernon Schryver
- RE: [Asrg] Lets Fix Mailing Lists,
Bruce Brown
- RE: [Asrg] Lets Fix Mailing Lists,
Vernon Schryver
- Re: [Asrg] Lets Fix Mailing Lists,
Hadmut Danisch
- Re: [Asrg] Lets Fix Mailing Lists,
Justin Mason
- Re: [Asrg] Lets Fix Mailing Lists,
Vernon Schryver
- Re: [Asrg] Lets Fix Mailing Lists,
Kee Hinckley
- Re: [Asrg] Lets Fix Mailing Lists,
Vernon Schryver
- Re: [Asrg] Lets Fix Mailing Lists,
Hadmut Danisch
- Re: [Asrg] Lets Fix Mailing Lists,
Kee Hinckley
- Re: [Asrg] Lets Fix Mailing Lists,
Chris Lewis
- Re: [Asrg] Lets Fix Mailing Lists,
Alan DeKok
- Re: [Asrg] Lets Fix Mailing Lists,
Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: [Asrg] Lets Fix Mailing Lists,
Kee Hinckley
- Re: [Asrg] Lets Fix Mailing Lists,
tjacobs
- Re: [Asrg] Lets Fix Mailing Lists,
Vernon Schryver
- Re: [Asrg] Lets Fix Mailing Lists,
tjacobs
- Re: [Asrg] Lets Fix Mailing Lists,
Vernon Schryver
- Re: [Asrg] Lets Fix Mailing Lists,
tjacobs
- Re: [Asrg] Lets Fix Mailing Lists,
Vernon Schryver
- Re: [Asrg] Lets Fix Mailing Lists,
Mark Delany
- Re: [Asrg] Lets Fix Mailing Lists,
Henrik Levkowetz
- Re: [Asrg] Lets Fix Mailing Lists,
Kee Hinckley
- RE: [Asrg] Lets Fix Mailing Lists,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: [Asrg] Lets Fix Mailing Lists,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: [Asrg] Lets Fix Mailing Lists,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: [Asrg] Lets Fix Mailing Lists,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: [Asrg] Lets Fix Mailing Lists,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: [Asrg] Lets Fix Mailing Lists,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: [Asrg] Lets Fix Mailing Lists,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: [Asrg] Lets Fix Mailing Lists,
Marco Paganini
- RE: [Asrg] Lets Fix Mailing Lists,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: [Asrg] Lets Fix Mailing Lists,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: [Asrg] Lets Fix Mailing Lists,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: [Asrg] Lets Fix Mailing Lists,
Paul Judge
- Re: [Asrg] Lets Fix Mailing Lists,
Jacqui Caren
- [Asrg] PKI and Filters,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- [Asrg] Why content filters are inacceptable,
Hadmut Danisch
- [Asrg] A technological or legal solution?,
Will E. Rose
- [Asrg] Receiving messages twice,
David Jameson
- [Asrg] DCC and IP checksums,
David F. Skoll
- Re: [Asrg] DCC and IP checksums,
Hadmut Danisch
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: [Asrg] DCC and IP checksums,
Sauer, Damon
- Re: [Asrg] DCC and IP checksums,
Hadmut Danisch
- [Asrg] DCC and IP checksums,
David F. Skoll
- RE: [Asrg] DCC and IP checksums,
Sauer, Damon
- RE: [Asrg] DCC and IP checksums,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: [Asrg] DCC and IP checksums,
Sauer, Damon
- RE: [Asrg] DCC and IP checksums,
Sauer, Damon
- RE: [Asrg] DCC and IP checksums,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: [Asrg] DCC and IP checksums,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: [Asrg] DCC and IP checksums,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: [Asrg] DCC and IP checksums,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: [Asrg] DCC and IP checksums,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: [Asrg] DCC and IP checksums,
Paul Judge
- Re: [Asrg] DCC and IP checksums,
william
- [Asrg] Nucleus of a draft BCP on filtering,
Chris Lewis
- Re: [Asrg] Nucleus of a draft BCP on filtering,
Keith Moore
- Re: [Asrg] Nucleus of a draft BCP on filtering,
Alan DeKok
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: [Asrg] Nucleus of a draft BCP on filtering,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: [Asrg] Nucleus of a draft BCP on filtering,
Sauer, Damon
- RE: [Asrg] Nucleus of a draft BCP on filtering,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: [Asrg] Nucleus of a draft BCP on filtering,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: [Asrg] Nucleus of a draft BCP on filtering,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: [Asrg] Nucleus of a draft BCP on filtering,
Sauer, Damon
- [Asrg] DCC and IP addresses,
David F. Skoll
- [Asrg] Peer to Peer MTA network,
Claus Färber
- RE: evaluating proposals against requirements (Re: [Asrg] requirements for a proposed solution + notion of consent),
Sauer, Damon
- [Asrg] Collecting statistics,
David F. Skoll
- [Asrg] Race conditions at end of DATA,
David F. Skoll
- [Asrg] Re: On the need for reliable, objective data,
David F. Skoll
- [Asrg] On the need for reliable, objective data,
Gary Feldman
- [Asrg] requirements for a proposed solution + notion of consent,
Balachander Krishnamurthy
- [Asrg] RE: PLI and DNSSEC deployability and DNS based solutions,
Tom Thomson
- [Asrg] RE: claims about law,
Tom Thomson
- [Asrg] Stamps,
David Jameson
- Re: [Asrg] Stamps,
Keith Moore
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: [Asrg] Stamps,
Sauer, Damon
- Re: [Asrg] Stamps,
Keith Moore
- Re: [Asrg] Stamps,
David Jameson
- Re: [Asrg] Stamps,
Jim Youll
- Re: [Asrg] Stamps,
Keith Moore
- Re: [Asrg] Stamps,
Nate W
- Re: [Asrg] Stamps,
Keith Moore
- Re: [Asrg] Stamps,
Nate W
- Re: [Asrg] Stamps,
David Jameson
- Re: [Asrg] Stamps,
Vernon Schryver
- Re: [Asrg] Stamps,
Keith Moore
- Re: [Asrg] Stamps,
Vernon Schryver
- Re: [Asrg] Stamps,
Jim Youll
- Re: [Asrg] Stamps,
Michael Ellis
- Re: [Asrg] Stamps,
Michael Ellis
- RE: [Asrg] Stamps,
Sauer, Damon
- RE: [Asrg] Stamps,
Sauer, Damon
- RE: [Asrg] Stamps,
Sauer, Damon
- RE: [Asrg] Stamps,
Sauer, Damon
- [Asrg] RMX & DNS: double advantage,
Hadmut Danisch
- [Asrg] [OT] Sender verification,
Matt Sergeant
- [Asrg] ** RESEND ** Abstract of proposed Internet Draft for Best Current Practice (please comment),
Dr. Jeffrey Race
- Re: pros and cons of RMX (Re: [Asrg] Declaration to the world) (fwd),
william
- [Asrg] DNS NONCE Record Proposal,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- [Asrg] The Consent 4-Tuple,
Alan DeKok
- Re: Disposable ISP accounts (was Re: [Asrg] RE: Asrg digest, Vol 1 #42 - 13 msgs),
Dr. Jeffrey Race
- RE: Patents (was Re: [Asrg] Time for the ISPs to fight back!),
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- [Asrg] RE: DNSSEC has it's own deployment problems (Re: Keith, Hadmut both right),
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- [Asrg] Problems that make the RMX proposal infeasible,
Jonathan Wilkins
- RE: pros and cons of RMX (Re: [Asrg] Declaration to the world),
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: pros and cons of RMX (Re: [Asrg] Declaration to the world),
Adam Back
- Re: pros and cons of RMX (Re: [Asrg] Declaration to the world),
Keith Moore
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: pros and cons of RMX (Re: [Asrg] Declaration to the world),
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: pros and cons of RMX (Re: [Asrg] Declaration to the world),
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: pros and cons of RMX (Re: [Asrg] Declaration to the world),
Jonathan Wilkins
- RE: pros and cons of RMX (Re: [Asrg] Declaration to the world),
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: pros and cons of RMX (Re: [Asrg] Declaration to the world),
Jonathan Wilkins
- RE: pros and cons of RMX (Re: [Asrg] Declaration to the world),
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: pros and cons of RMX (Re: [Asrg] Declaration to the world),
Jonathan Wilkins
- RE: pros and cons of RMX (Re: [Asrg] Declaration to the world),
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: pros and cons of RMX (Re: [Asrg] Declaration to the world),
Jonathan Wilkins
- RE: pros and cons of RMX (Re: [Asrg] Declaration to the world),
Jonathan Wilkins
- RE: pros and cons of RMX (Re: [Asrg] Declaration to the world),
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: pros and cons of RMX (Re: [Asrg] Declaration to the world),
Jonathan Wilkins
- [Asrg] email classes! (and i dont mean email 101),
matthew richards
- [Asrg] old mail protocols and authentication of sender,
Tom Thomson
- RE: [Asrg] definition of spam (was Re: consent expression),
Barclay, Robert
- Re: Limitations of filters (was Re: [Asrg] Do we need to do anyth ing?),
wayne
- [Asrg] Let's try something different,
Jed Margolin
- Re: [Asrg] Let's try something different,
wayne
- Re: [Asrg] Let's try something different,
Nate W
- Re: [Asrg] Let's try something different,
Matt Sergeant
- Re: [Asrg] Let's try something different,
Brad Davis
- Re: [Asrg] Let's try something different,
Jed Margolin
- Re: [Asrg] Let's try something different,
Kee Hinckley
- Re: [Asrg] Let's try something different,
Chris Lewis
- Re: [Asrg] Let's try something different,
Matt Sergeant
- Re: [Asrg] Let's try something different,
Chris Lewis
- Re: [Asrg] Let's try something different,
Vernon Schryver
- Re: [Asrg] Let's try something different,
Chris Lewis
- Re: [Asrg] Let's try something different,
Kee Hinckley
- Re: [Asrg] Let's try something different,
Jim Youll
- Re: [Asrg] Let's try something different,
Chris Lewis
- Re: [Asrg] Let's try something different,
Kee Hinckley
- Re: [Asrg] Let's try something different,
Matt Sergeant
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [Asrg] Let's try something different,
Joe St Sauver
- Re: [Asrg] Let's try something different,
Wes Peters
- Re: [Asrg] Let's try something different,
Matt Sergeant
- RE: [Asrg] Let's try something different,
Clayton, Nik [IT]
- [Asrg] Massive bounce rates on spammer lists,
Justin Mason
- [Asrg] RE: Asrg digest, Vol 1 #42 - 13 msgs,
Tom Thomson
- [Asrg] The Traveling Salesman SMTP problem,
wayne
- [Asrg] Do we need to do anything?,
Clayton, Nik [IT]
- Re: [Asrg] Do we need to do anything?,
Jon Kyme
- Limitations of filters (was Re: [Asrg] Do we need to do anything?),
David F. Skoll
- Re: [Asrg] Do we need to do anything?,
Hadmut Danisch
- Re: [Asrg] Do we need to do anything?,
James McIninch
- Re: [Asrg] Do we need to do anything?,
Matt Sergeant
- Re: [Asrg] Do we need to do anything?,
Jim Youll
- Re: [Asrg] Do we need to do anything?,
Justin Mason
- Re: [Asrg] Do we need to do anything?,
Jim Youll
- Re: [Asrg] Do we need to do anything?,
Kee Hinckley
- Re: [Asrg] Do we need to do anything?,
Chris Lewis
- Re: [Asrg] Do we need to do anything?,
william
- Re: [Asrg] Do we need to do anything?,
Kee Hinckley
- Re: [Asrg] Do we need to do anything?,
Jim Youll
- Re: [Asrg] Do we need to do anything?,
Kee Hinckley
- Re: [Asrg] Do we need to do anything?,
Jim Youll
- Re: [Asrg] Do we need to do anything?,
Jim Youll
- Re: [Asrg] Do we need to do anything?,
Matt Sergeant
- Re: [Asrg] Do we need to do anything?,
Jim Youll
- Re: [Asrg] Do we need to do anything?,
David F. Skoll
- Re: [Asrg] Do we need to do anything?,
Matt Sergeant
- Re: [Asrg] Do we need to do anything?,
Chris Fedde
- Re: [Asrg] Do we need to do anything?,
David F. Skoll
- [Asrg] Locked addresses (was Do we need to do anything?,
David F. Skoll
- Re: [Asrg] Locked addresses (was Do we need to do anything?,
Kee Hinckley
- Re: [Asrg] Locked addresses (was Do we need to do anything?,
David F. Skoll
- Re: [Asrg] Locked addresses (was Do we need to do anything?,
Kee Hinckley
- Re: [Asrg] Locked addresses (was Do we need to do anything?,
David F. Skoll
- Re: [Asrg] Locked addresses (was Do we need to do anything?,
Mark Delany
- Re: [Asrg] Locked addresses (was Do we need to do anything?,
Kee Hinckley
- Re: [Asrg] Locked addresses (was Do we need to do anything?,
David F. Skoll
- Re: [Asrg] Locked addresses (was Do we need to do anything?,
Kee Hinckley
- Re: [Asrg] Locked addresses (was Do we need to do anything?,
David F. Skoll
- Re: [Asrg] Locked addresses (was Do we need to do anything?,
Kee Hinckley
- RE: [Asrg] Locked addresses (was Do we need to do anything?,
Gary Feldman
- Re: [Asrg] Locked addresses (was Do we need to do anything?,
Hadmut Danisch
- Re: [Asrg] Locked addresses (was Do we need to do anything?,
Justin Mason
- Re: [Asrg] Do we need to do anything?,
wayne
- Re: [Asrg] Do we need to do anything?,
Nate W
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: [Asrg] Do we need to do anything?,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- [Asrg] RE: Asrg digest, Vol 1 #32 - 9 msgs,
Tom Thomson
- Keith, Hadmut both right RE: [Asrg] Deprecating plain POP accounts,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- [Asrg] RE: Requirements for source tracking,
Tom Thomson
- [Asrg] Declaration to the world,
Hadmut Danisch
- Re: [Asrg] Declaration to the world,
Keith Moore
- Re: [Asrg] Declaration to the world,
Jon Kyme
- Re: [Asrg] Declaration to the world,
Hadmut Danisch
- Re: [Asrg] Declaration to the world,
Jon Kyme
- Re: [Asrg] Declaration to the world,
Hadmut Danisch
- Re: [Asrg] Declaration to the world,
Keith Moore
- Re: [Asrg] Declaration to the world,
wayne
- Re: [Asrg] Declaration to the world,
Matt Sergeant
- Re: [Asrg] Declaration to the world,
Hadmut Danisch
- Re: [Asrg] Declaration to the world,
Matt Sergeant
- Re: [Asrg] Declaration to the world,
Adam Back
- Re: [Asrg] Declaration to the world,
Keith Moore
- Re: [Asrg] Declaration to the world,
wayne
- Re: [Asrg] Declaration to the world,
Jon Kyme
- Re: [Asrg] Declaration to the world,
Hadmut Danisch
- [Asrg] RMX breaks mailing lists,
Liudvikas Bukys
- Re: [Asrg] RMX breaks mailing lists (not necessarily),
David F. Skoll
- Re: [Asrg] RMX breaks mailing lists,
Derek J. Balling
- Re: [Asrg] RMX breaks mailing lists,
Liudvikas Bukys
- Re: [Asrg] Declaration to the world,
Pierre BRUA
- pros and cons of RMX (Re: [Asrg] Declaration to the world),
Adam Back
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: [Asrg] Declaration to the world,
Sauer, Damon
- RE: [Asrg] Declaration to the world,
Sauer, Damon
- [Asrg] dsprotocol and Underscores in DNS node names,
Gordon Fecyk - Home
- [Asrg] Back to the charter,
Gary Feldman
- [Asrg] Anonymity and freedom of expression,
David F. Skoll
- [Asrg] My Suggestion - HashCash + whitelist/auth,
ietf
- [Asrg] Summarizing,
Kee Hinckley
- Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records),
Vernon Schryver
- Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records),
Alan DeKok
- Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records),
David F. Skoll
- Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records),
Alan DeKok
- Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records),
william
- Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records),
David F. Skoll
- Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records),
Vernon Schryver
- Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records),
Alan DeKok
- Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records),
David F. Skoll
- Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records),
Alan DeKok
- Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records),
Chris Lewis
- Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records),
Alan DeKok
- Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records),
Keith Moore
- Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records),
David Jameson
- Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records),
Keith Moore
- Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records),
David Jameson
- Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records),
Keith Moore
- Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records),
Jim Youll
- Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records),
Keith Moore
- Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records),
Jim Youll
- Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records),
wayne
- Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records),
Keith Moore
- Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records),
Vernon Schryver
- Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records),
Chris Fedde
- Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records),
Keith Moore
- Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records),
Vernon Schryver
- Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records),
Kee Hinckley
- Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records),
Chris Lewis
- Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records),
Alan DeKok
- Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records),
Nate W
- Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records),
Chris Fedde
- Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records),
Keith Moore
- RE: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records),
Gary Feldman
- Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records),
Keith Moore
- Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records),
Chris Fedde
- Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records),
Chris Lewis
- Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records),
Alan DeKok
- Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records),
Chris Lewis
- Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records),
Chris Lewis
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records),
Clayton, Nik [IT]
- Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records),
Joe St Sauver
- Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records),
Balachander Krishnamurthy
- RE: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records),
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- [Asrg] Time for the ISPs to fight back!,
Richard
- Re: [Asrg] Time for the ISPs to fight back!,
Peter A. Friend
- Re: [Asrg] Time for the ISPs to fight back!,
Kee Hinckley
- Re: [Asrg] Time for the ISPs to fight back!,
Clifton Royston
- Re: [Asrg] Time for the ISPs to fight back!,
Keith Moore
- Patents (was Re: [Asrg] Time for the ISPs to fight back!),
David F. Skoll
- Re: Patents (was Re: [Asrg] Time for the ISPs to fight back!),
Clifton Royston
- Re: Patents (was Re: [Asrg] Time for the ISPs to fight back!),
Keith Moore
- Re: Patents (was Re: [Asrg] Time for the ISPs to fight back!),
Keith Moore
- Re: Patents (was Re: [Asrg] Time for the ISPs to fight back!),
Clifton Royston
- Re: Patents (was Re: [Asrg] Time for the ISPs to fight back!),
Keith Moore
- RE: Patents (was Re: [Asrg] Time for the ISPs to fight back!),
Bob Wyman
- Re: Patents (was Re: [Asrg] Time for the ISPs to fight back!),
David F. Skoll
- Re: Patents (was Re: [Asrg] Time for the ISPs to fight back!),
Rod Gilchrist
- RE: Patents (was Re: [Asrg] Time for the ISPs to fight back!),
Bob Wyman
- Re: [Asrg] Time for the ISPs to fight back!,
Kee Hinckley
- Re: [Asrg] Time for the ISPs to fight back!,
David F. Skoll
- Re: [Asrg] Time for the ISPs to fight back!,
Keith Moore
- Re: [Asrg] Time for the ISPs to fight back!,
Fred Baker
- [Asrg] Usefulness or otherwise of RMX records,
Tom Thomson
- [Asrg] How to can the spam,
Jason Hihn
- [Asrg] well is this a good idea ?!,
Alex Curvers
- [Asrg] new to the list...,
Pierre Fortin
- [Asrg] All mail is anonymous (and, therein lies much of the problem),
Bob Wyman
- [Asrg] Re: More advertising crap,
Fred Baker
Mail converted by MHonArc
