Anti-Spam Research Group Discussion Archive - Thread Index

• [Asrg] Multiple Suggestions, Sauer, Damon
  • Re: [Asrg] Multiple Suggestions, Keith Moore
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [Asrg] Multiple Suggestions, Sauer, Damon
    • Re: [Asrg] Multiple Suggestions, Keith Moore
  • RE: [Asrg] Multiple Suggestions, Sauer, Damon
    • Re: [Asrg] Multiple Suggestions, Keith Moore
• [Asrg] SHEESH!, Vernon Schryver
  • Re: [Asrg] SHEESH!, Chris Lewis
    • Re: [Asrg] SHEESH!, Vernon Schryver
      • Re: [Asrg] SHEESH!, Chris Lewis
      • Re: [Asrg] SHEESH!, Kee Hinckley
      • Re: [Asrg] SHEESH!, Vernon Schryver
      • Re: [Asrg] SHEESH!, Chris Lewis
      • Re: [Asrg] SHEESH!, Vernon Schryver
  • [Asrg] Re: SHEESH!, Fred Baker
• [Asrg] RE: Standardization of RFC headers for email content, don_zawada
  • Re: [Asrg] RE: Standardization of RFC headers for email content, Matt Sergeant
• [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, David F. Skoll
  • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Keith Moore
    • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, David F. Skoll
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Mathias Herberts
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, David F. Skoll
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Jim Youll
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, David F. Skoll
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Keith Moore
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, David F. Skoll
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Keith Moore
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, David F. Skoll
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Keith Moore
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Justin Mason
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Keith Moore
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, David F. Skoll
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Keith Moore
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Chris Lewis
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, David F. Skoll
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Chris Lewis
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, David F. Skoll
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Chris Lewis
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Mark Delany
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Kee Hinckley
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Vernon Schryver
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, David F. Skoll
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Chris Lewis
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, David F. Skoll
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Vernon Schryver
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Deven T. Corzine
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, David F. Skoll
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Brad Templeton
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, David F. Skoll
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Vernon Schryver
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, David F. Skoll
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, David F. Skoll
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Jim Youll
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, David F. Skoll
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Vernon Schryver
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, David F. Skoll
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Justin Mason
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Chris Lewis
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Keith Moore
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, David F. Skoll
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Keith Moore
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, David F. Skoll
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Keith Moore
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, David F. Skoll
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Jim Youll
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Keith Moore
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, David F. Skoll
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Keith Moore
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, David F. Skoll
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Keith Moore
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, David F. Skoll
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Keith Moore
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Daniel Feenberg
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Chris Lewis
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, David F. Skoll
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Chris Lewis
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Mark Delany
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Chris Lewis
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, David F. Skoll
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Deven T. Corzine
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Vernon Schryver
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Chris Lewis
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Nate W
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Kee Hinckley
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Chris Lewis
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Matt Sergeant
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Vernon Schryver
    • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Matt Sergeant
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Keith Moore
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Matt Sergeant
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Keith Moore
  • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Justin Mason
    • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Bill Yerazunis
    • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Vernon Schryver
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, David F. Skoll
  • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Kee Hinckley
    • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, David F. Skoll
      • Message not available
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Kee Hinckley
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Alan DeKok
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Mark Delany
      • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Chris Lewis
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Jacqui Caren
    • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, David F. Skoll
    • Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Keith Moore
  • RE: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Sauer, Damon
    • RE: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, David F. Skoll
  • RE: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Sauer, Damon
• [Asrg] Abstract of proposed Internet Draft for Best Current Practice (please comment), Dr. Jeffrey Race
• [Asrg] Sender pays vs the third world, Matt Sergeant
  • Re: [Asrg] Sender pays vs the third world, Eric S. Johansson
    • Re: [Asrg] Sender pays vs the third world, Matt Sergeant
      • Re: [Asrg] Sender pays vs the third world, Eric S. Johansson
      • Re: [Asrg] Sender pays vs the third world, Vernon Schryver
  • Re: [Asrg] Sender pays vs the third world, Kee Hinckley
• [Asrg] Deprecating plain POP accounts, Hadmut Danisch
  • Re: [Asrg] Deprecating plain POP accounts, Alan DeKok
    • Re: [Asrg] Deprecating plain POP accounts, Keith Moore
      • Re: [Asrg] Deprecating plain POP accounts, Alan DeKok
      • Re: [Asrg] Deprecating plain POP accounts, Keith Moore
      • Re: [Asrg] Deprecating plain POP accounts, Hadmut Danisch
      • Re: [Asrg] Deprecating plain POP accounts, Keith Moore
      • Re: [Asrg] Deprecating plain POP accounts, Hadmut Danisch
      • Re: [Asrg] Deprecating plain POP accounts, Keith Moore
      • Re: [Asrg] Deprecating plain POP accounts, Hadmut Danisch
      • Re: [Asrg] Deprecating plain POP accounts, Keith Moore
      • Re: [Asrg] Deprecating plain POP accounts, Hadmut Danisch
      • Re: [Asrg] Deprecating plain POP accounts, Alan DeKok
      • Re: [Asrg] Deprecating plain POP accounts, Keith Moore
      • Re: [Asrg] Deprecating plain POP accounts, Alan DeKok
      • Re: [Asrg] Deprecating plain POP accounts, Keith Moore
      • Re: [Asrg] Deprecating plain POP accounts, Alan DeKok
      • Re: [Asrg] Deprecating plain POP accounts, Keith Moore
      • Re: [Asrg] Deprecating plain POP accounts, Alan DeKok
      • Re: [Asrg] Deprecating plain POP accounts, Keith Moore
      • Re: [Asrg] Deprecating plain POP accounts, abuse
      • Re: [Asrg] Deprecating plain POP accounts, Hadmut Danisch
      • Re: [Asrg] Deprecating plain POP accounts, abuse
      • RE: [Asrg] Deprecating plain POP accounts, Gary Feldman
      • Re: [Asrg] Deprecating plain POP accounts, Keith Moore
      • Re: [Asrg] Deprecating plain POP accounts, Hadmut Danisch
    • Re: [Asrg] Deprecating plain POP accounts, Hadmut Danisch
  • Re: [Asrg] Deprecating plain POP accounts, Kee Hinckley
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Asrg] Deprecating plain POP accounts, Raymie Stata
    • Re: [Asrg] Deprecating plain POP accounts, Hadmut Danisch
• [Asrg] Getting spammers on a blacklist, curvers
• [Asrg] (no subject), curvers
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [Asrg] (no subject), Mark McCarron
    • RE: [Asrg] (no subject), Danny Angus
  • RE: [Asrg] (no subject), Mark McCarron
    • RE: *Suspected Spam *RE: [Asrg] (no subject), Danny Angus
    • RE: [Asrg] (no subject), Yakov Shafranovich
  • [Asrg] (no subject), Patrick Galvin
  • [Asrg] (no subject), John Fenley
  • [Asrg] (no subject), Kurt Magnusson
  • [Asrg] (no subject), Kurt Magnusson
  • [Asrg] (no subject), Richard Willey
  • Re: [Asrg] (no subject), John Levine
    • Re: [Asrg] (no subject), Barry Shein
  • RE: [Asrg] (no subject), Hallam-Baker, Phillip
    • Re: [Asrg] (no subject), Devdas Bhagat
  • RE: [Asrg] (no subject), Hallam-Baker, Phillip
  • RE: [Asrg] (no subject), Hallam-Baker, Phillip
    • The end result of E-postage (was Re: [Asrg] (no subject) ), Alan DeKok
    • RE: [Asrg] (no subject), Barry Shein
  • RE: [Asrg] (no subject), Hallam-Baker, Phillip
    • RE: [Asrg] (no subject), Barry Shein
      • Re: [Asrg] (no subject), Roger B.A. Klorese
      • Re: [Asrg] (no subject), Barry Shein
      • Re: [Asrg] (no subject), \"Roger B.A. Klorese \"
      • Re: [Asrg] (no subject), Barry Shein
      • Re: [Asrg] (no subject), Roger B.A. Klorese
      • Re: [Asrg] (no subject), Barry Shein
      • Re: [Asrg] (no subject), \"Roger B.A. Klorese\"
      • [Asrg] E-postage from first principles, John Levine
      • Re: [Asrg] E-postage from first principles, Jonathan Morton
      • Re: [Asrg] E-postage from first principles, John Levine
      • Re: [Asrg] E-postage from first principles, Jonathan Morton
      • Re: [Asrg] 3 (Message Verification) - Viability of hashcash-based signatures (was: E-postage from first principles), Jonathan Morton
      • [Asrg] Consent protocols - was E-postage, David Maxwell
      • [Asrg] Re: Consent protocols - was E-postage, John Levine
      • [Asrg] Re: Consent protocols - was E-postage, David Maxwell
      • [Asrg] Re: Consent protocols - was E-postage, John Levine
      • [Asrg] Re: Consent protocols - was E-postage, David Maxwell
      • [Asrg] Re: Consent protocols - was E-postage, John Levine
      • [Asrg] Re: Consent protocols - was E-postage, David Maxwell
      • Re: [Asrg] E-postage from first principles, Barry Shein
      • Re: [Asrg] E-postage from first principles, Yakov Shafranovich
  • [Asrg] (no subject), Paul.judge
  • [Asrg] (no subject), Paul Lambert
• [Asrg] Sabotage?, Hadmut Danisch
• [Asrg] Requirements for source tracking, Raymie Stata
  • [Asrg] desirable characteristics of source tracking (was: Requirements forsource tracking), Keith Moore
    • Re: [Asrg] desirable characteristics of source tracking (was: Requirements for source tracking), Hadmut Danisch
      • Re: [Asrg] desirable characteristics of source tracking (was:Requirements for source tracking), Keith Moore
      • Re: [Asrg] desirable characteristics of source tracking (was: Requirements for source tracking), Hadmut Danisch
      • Re: [Asrg] desirable characteristics of source tracking (was:Requirements for source tracking), Keith Moore
      • Re: [Asrg] desirable characteristics of source tracking (was: Requirements for source tracking), Hadmut Danisch
      • Re: [Asrg] desirable characteristics of source tracking (was:Requirements for source tracking), Keith Moore
      • privacy is a feature (Re: [Asrg] desirable characteristics of source tracking), Adam Back
      • [Asrg] Whoops -- list volume is way too high, some principles, Brad Templeton
      • Re: [Asrg] Whoops -- list volume is way too high, some principles, Hadmut Danisch
      • Re: [Asrg] Whoops -- list volume is way too high, some principles, Brad Templeton
      • Spam Laws (was Re: [Asrg] Whoops -- list volume is way too high,some principles), Pierre BRUA
      • Re: [Asrg] Whoops -- list volume is way too high, some principles, Chris Lewis
      • Re: privacy is a feature (Re: [Asrg] desirable characteristics of source tracking), Hadmut Danisch
      • Re: privacy is a feature (Re: [Asrg] desirable characteristics of source tracking), Adam Back
      • Re: privacy is a feature (Re: [Asrg] desirable characteristics of source tracking), Hadmut Danisch
      • Re: privacy is a feature (Re: [Asrg] desirable characteristics ofsource tracking), Keith Moore
      • Re: privacy is a feature (Re: [Asrg] desirable characteristics of source tracking), Hadmut Danisch
      • Re: privacy is a feature (Re: [Asrg] desirable characteristics of source tracking), Clifton Royston
      • Re: privacy is a feature (Re: [Asrg] desirable characteristics of source tracking), Hadmut Danisch
      • Re: privacy is a feature (Re: [Asrg] desirable characteristics ofsource tracking), David F. Skoll
      • Re: privacy is a feature (Re: [Asrg] desirable characteristics of source tracking), Hadmut Danisch
      • Re: privacy is a feature (Re: [Asrg] desirable characteristics ofsource tracking), David F. Skoll
      • Re: privacy is a feature (Re: [Asrg] desirable characteristics of source tracking), Hadmut Danisch
      • Re: privacy is a feature (Re: [Asrg] desirable characteristics of source tracking), Alan DeKok
      • Re: privacy is a feature (Re: [Asrg] desirable characteristics ofsource tracking), Keith Moore
      • Re: privacy is a feature (Re: [Asrg] desirable characteristics of source tracking), Hadmut Danisch
      • Re: privacy is a feature (Re: [Asrg] desirable characteristics ofsource tracking), Chris Lewis
      • Re: privacy is a feature (Re: [Asrg] desirable characteristics ofsource tracking), Keith Moore
      • Re: privacy is a feature (Re: [Asrg] desirable characteristics of source tracking), Hadmut Danisch
      • Re: privacy is a feature (Re: [Asrg] desirable characteristics ofsource tracking), Keith Moore
      • Re: privacy is a feature (Re: [Asrg] desirable characteristics of source tracking), Hadmut Danisch
      • Re: privacy is a feature (Re: [Asrg] desirable characteristics ofsource tracking), Keith Moore
      • Re: privacy is a feature (Re: [Asrg] desirable characteristics of source tracking), Hadmut Danisch
      • Re: privacy is a feature (Re: [Asrg] desirable characteristics of source tracking), Adam Back
      • Re: privacy is a feature (Re: [Asrg] desirable characteristics of source tracking), Hadmut Danisch
      • Re: privacy is a feature (Re: [Asrg] desirable characteristics ofsource tracking), Keith Moore
      • Re: privacy is a feature (Re: [Asrg] desirable characteristics of source tracking), Hadmut Danisch
      • Re: privacy is a feature (Re: [Asrg] desirable characteristics ofsource tracking), Keith Moore
      • Re: privacy is a feature (Re: [Asrg] desirable characteristics of source tracking), Hadmut Danisch
      • Re: privacy is a feature (Re: [Asrg] desirable characteristics of source tracking), wayne
      • Re: privacy is a feature (Re: [Asrg] desirable characteristics ofsource tracking), Chris Lewis
      • Re: privacy is a feature (Re: [Asrg] desirable characteristics of source tracking), Hadmut Danisch
      • [Asrg] RMX provides auth for one-hop only (Re: privacy is a feature), Adam Back
      • [Asrg] Re: RMX provides auth for one-hop only (Re: privacy is a feature), Chris Lewis
      • Re: [Asrg] RMX provides auth for one-hop only (Re: privacy is a feature), wayne
      • Re: privacy is a feature (Re: [Asrg] desirable characteristics of source tracking), Roland
      • Re: privacy is a feature (Re: [Asrg] desirable characteristics of source tracking), Hadmut Danisch
      • Re: privacy is a feature (Re: [Asrg] desirable characteristics ofsource tracking), Keith Moore
      • Re: privacy is a feature (Re: [Asrg] desirable characteristics of source tracking), Adam Back
      • Re: privacy is a feature (Re: [Asrg] desirable characteristics of source tracking), Vernon Schryver
      • Re: privacy is a feature (Re: [Asrg] desirable characteristics ofsource tracking), Keith Moore
      • Re: privacy is a feature (Re: [Asrg] desirable characteristics ofsource tracking), william
      • Re: privacy is a feature (Re: [Asrg] desirable characteristics of source tracking), Hadmut Danisch
      • Re: [Asrg] desirable characteristics of source tracking (was: Requirements for source tracking), Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
      • Re: [Asrg] desirable characteristics of source tracking (was: Requirements for source tracking), Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
      • Re: [Asrg] desirable characteristics of source tracking, Michael Marking
      • Re: [Asrg] desirable characteristics of source tracking, Kee Hinckley
      • Re: [Asrg] desirable characteristics of source tracking, Jim Youll
  • Re: [Asrg] Requirements for source tracking, Kee Hinckley
• Re: [Asrg] MTP drafty, Dr. Jeffrey Race
  • Re: [Asrg] MTP drafty, Brad Templeton
• [Asrg] New Internet Draft I'm working on, Gordon Fecyk - Home
  • Re: [Asrg] New Internet Draft I'm working on, Mariano Absatz
    • RE: [Asrg] DS and Underscores, Gordon Fecyk - Home
• [Asrg] filters play a role, Peter A. Friend
• Re: [Asrg] Standardization of RFC headers for emailcontentanalysis?, Kee Hinckley
  • Re: [Asrg] Standardization of RFC headers for email contentanalysis?, Chris Lewis
• [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's fix it, Shannon Jacobs
  • Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's fix it, Mark Delany
  • Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's fix it, Keith Moore
  • Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's fix it, Brad Templeton
    • Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's fix it, Shannon Jacobs
      • Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's fix it, Mark Delany
      • Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's fix it, Keith Moore
    • Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's fix it, Eric S. Johansson
      • Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's fix it, Brad Templeton
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's fix it, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
    • Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's fix it, Kee Hinckley
      • Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's fix it, Nate W
      • Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's fix it, Kee Hinckley
      • Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's fix it, Nate W
      • Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's fix it, Kee Hinckley
      • Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's fix it, Nate W
      • Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's fix it, Troy Rollo
      • Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's fix it, Nate W
      • Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's fix it, Troy Rollo
      • Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's fix it, Eric S. Johansson
      • Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's fix it, Kee Hinckley
      • Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's fix it, Chris Lewis
      • Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's fix it, Eric S. Johansson
      • Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's fix it, Kee Hinckley
      • Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's fix it, Eric S. Johansson
      • Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's fix it, Kee Hinckley
      • Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's fix it, Eric S. Johansson
      • Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's fix it, Kee Hinckley
      • Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's fix it, Vernon Schryver
      • Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's fix it, Eric S. Johansson
      • Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's fix it, Vernon Schryver
    • Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's fix it, Nate W
  • Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's fix it, Shannon Jacobs
    • Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's fix it, Nate W
      • Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's fix it, Matt Sergeant
      • Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's fix it, wayne
      • Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's fix it, Eric S. Johansson
      • Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's fix it, David Jameson
      • Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's fix it, mathew
  • Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's fix it, David Jameson
    • Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's fix it, Eric S. Johansson
      • Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's fix it, Vernon Schryver
      • Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's fix it, Eric S. Johansson
      • Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's fix it, David Jameson
  • RE: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's fix it, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
    • Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's fix it, Eric S. Johansson
      • Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's fix it, Vernon Schryver
      • Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's fix it, Justin Mason
  • RE: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's fix it, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
    • Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's fix it, Eric S. Johansson
  • RE: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's fix it, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
  • RE: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's fix it, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
    • RE: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's fix it, Steve Schear
• consent expression (was RE: [Asrg] ASRG next steps), Paul Judge
  • Re: consent expression (was RE: [Asrg] ASRG next steps), Vernon Schryver
  • [Asrg] definition of spam (was Re: consent expression), Keith Moore
    • Re: [Asrg] definition of spam (was Re: consent expression), Brad Templeton
      • Re: [Asrg] definition of spam (was Re: consent expression), Keith Moore
      • Re: [Asrg] definition of spam (was Re: consent expression), Brad Templeton
      • Re: [Asrg] definition of spam (was Re: consent expression), Mark Delany
      • Re: [Asrg] definition of spam (was Re: consent expression), Brad Templeton
      • Re: [Asrg] definition of spam (was Re: consent expression), Mark Delany
      • Re: [Asrg] definition of spam (was Re: consent expression), Brad Templeton
      • Re: [Asrg] definition of spam (was Re: consent expression), Mark Delany
      • Re: [Asrg] definition of spam (was Re: consent expression), Keith Moore
      • Re: [Asrg] definition of spam (was Re: consent expression), Roland
      • Re: [Asrg] definition of spam (was Re: consent expression), Keith Moore
      • Re: [Asrg] definition of spam (was Re: consent expression), Roland
      • Re: [Asrg] definition of spam (was Re: consent expression), Keith Moore
      • Re: [Asrg] definition of spam (was Re: consent expression), Chris Lewis
      • Re: [Asrg] definition of spam (was Re: consent expression), Keith Moore
      • Re: [Asrg] definition of spam (was Re: consent expression), Chris Lewis
      • Re: [Asrg] definition of spam (was Re: consent expression), Kee Hinckley
      • Re: [Asrg] definition of spam (was Re: consent expression), Troy Rollo
      • Re: [Asrg] definition of spam (was Re: consent expression), Keith Moore
      • Re: [Asrg] definition of spam (was Re: consent expression), Kee Hinckley
      • Re: [Asrg] definition of spam (was Re: consent expression), Keith Moore
      • Re: [Asrg] definition of spam (was Re: consent expression), Troy Rollo
      • RE: [Asrg] definition of spam (was Re: consent expression), Gary Feldman
      • Re: [Asrg] definition of spam (was Re: consent expression), Fred Baker
      • Re: [Asrg] definition of spam (was Re: consent expression), Troy Rollo
      • Re: [Asrg] definition of spam (was Re: consent expression), Alan DeKok
      • Re: [Asrg] definition of spam (was Re: consent expression), Chris Lewis
      • Re: [Asrg] definition of spam (was Re: consent expression), Brad Templeton
      • Re: [Asrg] definition of spam (was Re: consent expression), Keith Moore
      • principles / first do no damage (Re: [Asrg] definition of spam), Adam Back
      • Re: principles / first do no damage (Re: [Asrg] definition of spam), Keith Moore
  • Re: consent expression (was RE: [Asrg] ASRG next steps), Fred Baker
    • RE: consent expression (was RE: [Asrg] ASRG next steps), Bob Wyman
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: consent expression (was RE: [Asrg] ASRG next steps), Barclay, Robert
• [Asrg] ASRG next steps, Paul Judge
  • Re: [Asrg] ASRG next steps, Vernon Schryver
  • Re: [Asrg] ASRG next steps, Keith Moore
  • Re: [Asrg] ASRG next steps, Chris Lewis
• [Asrg] Standardization of RFC headers for email content analysis?, Clifton Royston
  • RE: [Asrg] Standardization of RFC headers for email content analysis?, Bob Wyman
    • Re: [Asrg] Standardization of RFC headers for email content analysis?, Clifton Royston
    • Re: [Asrg] Standardization of RFC headers for email contentanalysis?, Keith Moore
  • Re: [Asrg] Standardization of RFC headers for email contentanalysis?, Keith Moore
• [Asrg] No one-day registration at 56th IETF?, Mark Delany
  • Re: [Asrg] No one-day registration at 56th IETF?, Keith Moore
• [Asrg] MTP draft, Hadmut Danisch
  • Re: [Asrg] MTP draft, Martin hepworth
    • Re: [Asrg] MTP draft, Hadmut Danisch
      • Re: [Asrg] MTP draft, Martin hepworth
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Asrg] MTP draft, Jacqui Caren
    • Re: [Asrg] MTP draft, Hadmut Danisch
    • Re: [Asrg] MTP draft, David F. Skoll
  • Re: [Asrg] MTP draft, Vernon Schryver
    • Re: [Asrg] MTP draft, Craig Hughes
      • Re: [Asrg] MTP draft, Vernon Schryver
      • Re: [Asrg] MTP draft, Brad Templeton
      • Re: [Asrg] MTP draft, Vernon Schryver
      • Re: [Asrg] MTP draft, Brad Templeton
      • Re: [Asrg] MTP draft, Vernon Schryver
      • Re: [Asrg] MTP draft, Brad Templeton
      • Re: [Asrg] MTP draft, Alan DeKok
      • Re: [Asrg] MTP drafty, Brad Templeton
      • Re: [Asrg] MTP drafty, Alan DeKok
      • Re: [Asrg] MTP drafty, Brad Templeton
      • Re: [Asrg] MTP drafty, Chris Lewis
      • Re: [Asrg] MTP drafty, Alan DeKok
      • Re: [Asrg] MTP drafty, Alan DeKok
      • Re: [Asrg] MTP drafty, Kee Hinckley
      • Re: [Asrg] MTP drafty, Chris Lewis
      • Re: [Asrg] MTP drafty, Kee Hinckley
      • Re: [Asrg] MTP drafty, Brad Templeton
      • Re: [Asrg] MTP drafty, Hadmut Danisch
      • free-speech and anonymity are related (Re: [Asrg] MTP drafty), Adam Back
      • Re: free-speech and anonymity are related (Re: [Asrg] MTP drafty), Hadmut Danisch
      • Re: free-speech and anonymity are related (Re: [Asrg] MTP drafty), Steve Schear
      • Re: [Asrg] MTP drafty, Kee Hinckley
      • Re: [Asrg] MTP drafty, Kee Hinckley
      • Re: [Asrg] MTP draft, Vernon Schryver
      • Re: [Asrg] MTP draft, Brad Templeton
    • Re: [Asrg] MTP draft, Hadmut Danisch
      • Re: [Asrg] MTP draft, David F. Skoll
      • Re: [Asrg] MTP draft, Hadmut Danisch
      • Re: [Asrg] MTP draft, David F. Skoll
      • Re: [Asrg] MTP draft, Vernon Schryver
      • Re: [Asrg] MTP draft, David F. Skoll
      • Re: [Asrg] MTP draft, Vernon Schryver
      • Re: [Asrg] MTP draft, David F. Skoll
      • Re: [Asrg] MTP draft, Claus Färber
      • Re: [Asrg] MTP draft, Vernon Schryver
      • Re: [Asrg] MTP draft, Vernon Schryver
      • Scanning with Perl (was Re: [Asrg] MTP draft), David F. Skoll
      • Re: Scanning with Perl (was Re: [Asrg] MTP draft), Chris Lewis
      • Re: Scanning with Perl (was Re: [Asrg] MTP draft), Vernon Schryver
      • Re: [Asrg] MTP draft, Brad Templeton
      • Re: [Asrg] MTP draft, Vernon Schryver
      • Re: [Asrg] MTP draft, Daniel Feenberg
      • Re: [Asrg] MTP draft, Justin Mason
  • RE: [Asrg] MTP draft, Clayton, Nik [IT]
• [Asrg] Going to Extremes to Fight Spam, Johan Louwers
  • Re: [Asrg] Going to Extremes to Fight Spam, David F. Skoll
    • Re: [Asrg] Going to Extremes to Fight Spam, Johan Louwers
• Re: [Asrg] Textual Analysis is not the solution, David F. Skoll
• [Asrg] Separate solution from implementation, Hadmut Danisch
• [Asrg] Spam definitions, spam solutions, Brad Templeton
• [Asrg] filtering at connect time, Michael Marking
  • Re: [Asrg] filtering at connect time, Mark Delany
  • Re: [Asrg] filtering at connect time, wayne
    • Re: [Asrg] filtering at connect time, David F. Skoll
      • Re: [Asrg] filtering at connect time, Brad Templeton
      • Re: [Asrg] filtering at connect time, David F. Skoll
      • Re: [Asrg] filtering at connect time, Vernon Schryver
      • Re: [Asrg] filtering at connect time, Keith Moore
      • Re: [Asrg] filtering at connect time, Chris Lewis
      • Re: [Asrg] filtering at connect time, Keith Moore
  • Re: [Asrg] filtering at connect time, David F. Skoll
    • Re: [Asrg] filtering at connect time, Craig Hughes
      • Re: [Asrg] filtering at connect time, Justin Mason
      • Re: [Asrg] filtering at connect time, David F. Skoll
      • Re: [Asrg] filtering at connect time, Justin Mason
      • Re: [Asrg] filtering at connect time, David F. Skoll
      • Re: [Asrg] filtering at connect time, Mark Delany
      • Temp-failing first-time unknowns (was Re: [Asrg] filtering at connecttime), David F. Skoll
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Asrg] filtering at connect time, Chris Lewis
  • Re: [Asrg] filtering at connect time, Dr. Jeffrey Race
    • Re: [Asrg] filtering at connect time, Brad Templeton
      • [Asrg] Are open relays on the decline?, wayne
      • Re: [Asrg] filtering at connect time, Brad Davis
      • Re: [Asrg] filtering at connect time, Chris Lewis
      • Re: [Asrg] filtering at connect time, Keith Moore
      • Message not available
      • Re: [Asrg] filtering at connect time, Keith Moore
      • Re: [Asrg] filtering at connect time, Daniel Feenberg
      • Re: [Asrg] filtering at connect time, Keith Moore
      • Re: [Asrg] filtering at connect time, Daniel Feenberg
      • Re: [Asrg] filtering at connect time, Keith Moore
      • Re: [Asrg] filtering at connect time, Kee Hinckley
  • Re: [Asrg] filtering at connect time, Dr. Jeffrey Race
    • Re: [Asrg] filtering at connect time, Vernon Schryver
  • Re: [Asrg] filtering at connect time, Jim Youll
    • Re: [Asrg] filtering at connect time, Michael Marking
      • Re: [Asrg] filtering at connect time, Jim Youll
      • Re: [Asrg] filtering at connect time, Michael Marking
      • Re: [Asrg] filtering at connect time, Jim Youll
      • Re: [Asrg] filtering at connect time, Michael Marking
      • Re: [Asrg] filtering at connect time, Jim Youll
      • Re: [Asrg] filtering at connect time, Brad Templeton
  • Re: [Asrg] filtering at connect time, Dr. Jeffrey Race
    • Re: [Asrg] filtering at connect time, Keith Moore
  • Re: [Asrg] filtering at connect time, Dr. Jeffrey Race
    • Re: [Asrg] filtering at connect time, Michael Marking
  • Re: [Asrg] filtering at connect time, Dr. Jeffrey Race
    • Re: [Asrg] filtering at connect time, Michael Marking
    • Re: [Asrg] filtering at connect time, Vernon Schryver
  • Re: [Asrg] filtering at connect time, Dr. Jeffrey Race
  • Re: [Asrg] filtering at connect time, Tony Finch
• [Asrg] hashcash as anti-spam measure (Re: solution space), Adam Back
• no benefit conclusion likely wrong (Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records), Adam Back
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: no benefit conclusion likely wrong (Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records), mike . pearson
• [Asrg] Proven solution for authenticating messages, mike . pearson
  • Re: [Asrg] Proven solution for authenticating messages, Hadmut Danisch
    • Re: [Asrg] Proven solution for authenticating messages, Prasenjeet Dutta
      • Re: [Asrg] Proven solution for authenticating messages, Hadmut Danisch
      • Re: [Asrg] Proven solution for authenticating messages, Prasenjeet Dutta
      • Re: [Asrg] Proven solution for authenticating messages, Hadmut Danisch
      • Re: [Asrg] Proven solution for authenticating messages, Prasenjeet Dutta
      • use of signatures is not restricted by law (Re: [Asrg] Proven solution for authenticating messages), Adam Back
      • Re: use of signatures is not restricted by law (Re: [Asrg] Proven solution for authenticating messages), Hadmut Danisch
      • Re: use of signatures is not restricted by law (Re: [Asrg] Proven solution for authenticating messages), Adam Back
      • Re: use of signatures is not restricted by law (Re: [Asrg] Proven solution for authenticating messages), Hadmut Danisch
      • Re: use of signatures is not restricted by law (Re: [Asrg] Proven solution for authenticating messages), Adam Back
      • RE: use of signatures is not restricted by law (Re: [Asrg] Proven solution for authenticating messages), Bob Wyman
      • Re: use of signatures is not restricted by law (Re: [Asrg] Proven solution for authenticating messages), Hadmut Danisch
      • Re: use of signatures is not restricted by law (Re: [Asrg] Provensolution for authenticating messages), Ben Laurie
      • Re: use of signatures is not restricted by law (Re: [Asrg] Proven solution for authenticating messages), Brad Templeton
      • Re: [Asrg] Proven solution for authenticating messages, Roland
      • Re: [Asrg] Proven solution for authenticating messages, Prasenjeet Dutta
      • Re: [Asrg] Proven solution for authenticating messages, Brad Templeton
      • Re: [Asrg] Proven solution for authenticating messages, Matthias Leisi
      • Re: [Asrg] Proven solution for authenticating messages, Vernon Schryver
• [Asrg] Mail Cookies Was: Single-User Addresses, Hadmut Danisch
  • Re: [Asrg] Mail Cookies Was: Single-User Addresses, David F. Skoll
  • RE: [Asrg] Mail Cookies Was: Single-User Addresses, Bob Wyman
    • Re: [Asrg] Mail Cookies Was: Single-User Addresses, Hadmut Danisch
      • Re: [Asrg] Mail Cookies Was: Single-User Addresses, Roland
  • Re: [Asrg] Mail Cookies Was: Single-User Addresses, Fred Condo
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [Asrg] Mail Cookies Was: Single-User Addresses, Bob Wyman