Anti-Spam Research Group Discussion Archive - Thread Index

• RE: [Asrg] ASRG IPR policy (was RE: US Spam patents: Partial list), (continued)
  • RE: [Asrg] ASRG IPR policy (was RE: US Spam patents: Partial list), Yakov Shafranovich
  • RE: [Asrg] ASRG IPR policy (was RE: US Spam patents: Partial list), Paul Judge
    • RE: [Asrg] ASRG IPR policy (was RE: US Spam patents: Partial list ), Kee Hinckley
      • RE: [Asrg] ASRG IPR policy (was RE: US Spam patents: Partial list ), Harald Tveit Alvestrand
  • RE: [Asrg] ASRG IPR policy (was RE: US Spam patents: Partial list), Paul Judge
• [Asrg] MailBlocks and ASRG, Yakov Shafranovich
• [Asrg] Statistical Analysis shows SPF should work Pretty Well, Meng Weng Wong
  • Re: [Asrg] Statistical Analysis shows SPF should work Pretty Well, Kee Hinckley
  • Re: [Asrg] Statistical Analysis shows SPF should work Pretty Well, Vernon Schryver
    • Re: [Asrg] Statistical Analysis shows SPF should work Pretty Well, Yakov Shafranovich
      • Re: [Asrg] Statistical Analysis shows SPF should work Pretty Well, Vernon Schryver
  • Re: [Asrg] Statistical Analysis shows SPF should work Pretty Well, Yakov Shafranovich
  • Re: [Asrg] Statistical Analysis shows SPF should work Pretty Well, Barry Shein
    • [Asrg] Spammer responses to SPF, Meng Weng Wong
      • Re: [Asrg] Spammer responses to SPF, Yakov Shafranovich
      • Re: [Asrg] Spammer responses to SPF, Alan DeKok
      • Re: [Asrg] Spammer responses to SPF, Yakov Shafranovich
      • [Asrg] SPF: Summary of Objections, Meng Weng Wong
      • [Asrg] Re: SPF: Summary of Objections, erratum, Meng Weng Wong
      • [Asrg] Re: SPF: Objection 5, Meng Weng Wong
      • [Asrg] Re: SPF: Objection 8, Meng Weng Wong
      • Re: [Asrg] Re: SPF: Objection 8, Barry Shein
      • [Asrg] Re: SPF: Objection 8, Jon Kyme
      • [Asrg] Re: SPF: Objection 7, Meng Weng Wong
      • Re: [Asrg] Re: SPF: Objection 7, Barry Shein