Anti-Spam Research Group Discussion Archive - Thread Index

• [Asrg] Re: SPF: Objections 1 and 2, (continued)
  • [Asrg] Re: SPF: Objections 1 and 2, Meng Weng Wong
  • [Asrg] Increase in spoofed spam using bogus sender, Eric Dean
  • [Asrg] Re: SPF: Objection 9, Meng Weng Wong
  • [Asrg] Re: SPF: Objection 9, Jon Kyme
  • [Asrg] Re: SPF: Objection 6, Meng Weng Wong
  • [Asrg] Re: SPF: Objections 3 and 4, Meng Weng Wong
  • Re: [Asrg] SPF: Summary of Objections, Vernon Schryver
  • Re: [Asrg] SPF: Summary of Objections, Dave Crocker
  • Re: [Asrg] SPF: Summary of Objections, Dave Crocker
  • Re: [Asrg] Spammer responses to SPF, Markus Stumpf
  • [Asrg] SPF: Objection: spammers will use <>, Meng Weng Wong
  • Re: [Asrg] SPF: Objection: spammers will use <>, Markus Stumpf
  • Re: [Asrg] SPF: Objection: spammers will use <>, Yakov Shafranovich
  • Re: [Asrg] Statistical Analysis shows SPF should work Pretty Well, Yakov Shafranovich
• [Asrg] News Article - Court denies Mailblocks' injunction request, Yakov Shafranovich
• [Asrg] good example of ASRG proposal?, Peter Kay
  • RE: [Asrg] good example of ASRG proposal?, Bob Wyman
• [Asrg] News Article - Stealing IP address ownership to send spam, Yakov Shafranovich
• [Asrg] RMX+DMP = SPF: a technical approach, Meng Weng Wong
• [Asrg] US Spam patents: Partial list, Bob Wyman
  • Re: [Asrg] US Spam patents: Partial list, Yakov Shafranovich
  • RE: [Asrg] US Spam patents: Partial list, Bob Wyman
    • RE: [Asrg] US Spam patents: Partial list, Yakov Shafranovich
  • RE: [Asrg] US Spam patents: Partial list, Bob Wyman
  • RE: [Asrg] US Spam patents: Partial list, Bob Wyman