Anti-Spam Research Group Discussion Archive - Thread Index

• Re: Relay honeypots (RE: [Asrg] define spam), (continued)
  • Message not available
    • Re: Relay honeypots (RE: [Asrg] define spam), Brad Spencer
  • Re: Relay honeypots (RE: [Asrg] define spam), Brad Spencer
    • Re: Relay honeypots (RE: [Asrg] define spam), Kee Hinckley
• RE: [Asrg] Taxonomy and List of Requirements, Paul Judge
  • RE: [Asrg] Taxonomy and List of Requirements, Brad Spencer
• [Asrg] where is the current draft of the taxonomy, Russell-2asrg44all-
  • Re: [Asrg] where is the current draft of the taxonomy, william
• [Asrg] Taxoonomy and List of Requirements, Brad Spencer
• Re: [Asrg] Re: "ham" is ridiculous -was- Re: False Positive, Brad Spencer
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [Asrg] Re: "ham" is ridiculous -was- Re: False Positive, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• [Asrg] Indescriminate WANTED spam, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
  • Re: [Asrg] Indescriminate WANTED spam, Markus Stumpf
    • Re: [Asrg] Indescriminate WANTED spam, Chuq Von Rospach
      • Re: [Asrg] Indescriminate WANTED spam, Markus Stumpf
• Re: [Asrg] 2.0 Metrics, Jon Kyme
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [Asrg] 2.0 Metrics, Tom Thomson
• Spam costs. RE: [Asrg] SMTP over SSL, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• [Asrg] Turing Test ..., Art Pollard
  • Re: [Asrg] Turing Test ..., Claus Assmann
    • Re: [Asrg] Turing Test ..., J C Lawrence
  • Re: [Asrg] Turing Test ..., Kee Hinckley
    • Re: [Asrg] Turing Test ..., matthew richards
      • Re: [Asrg] Turing Test ..., Kee Hinckley
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Asrg] Turing Test ..., Art Pollard
    • Re: [Asrg] Turing Test ..., Claus Assmann