Anti-Spam Research Group Discussion Archive - Thread Index

• RE: [Asrg] Rejecting Email, (continued)
  • RE: [Asrg] Rejecting Email, Vernon Schryver
• [Asrg] RFC3514 -> Evil Header (note: consider this first email for april), william
  • Re: [Asrg] RFC3514 -> Evil Header (note: consider this first email for april), Matthew Goddard
• False Positive -was- RE: [Asrg] Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details, Eric D. Williams
  • Re: False Positive -was- RE: [Asrg] Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details, Liudvikas Bukys
    • Re: False Positive -was- RE: [Asrg] Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details, Clifton Royston
      • Re: False Positive -was- RE: [Asrg] Fwd: Returned mail: seetranscript for details, Jim Youll
      • Re: False Positive -was- RE: [Asrg] Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details, Matt Sergeant
      • [Asrg] "ham" is ridiculous -was- Re: False Positive, Jim Youll
      • [Asrg] Re: "ham" is ridiculous -was- Re: False Positive, Matt Sergeant
      • [Asrg] Re: "ham" is ridiculous -was- Re: False Positive, Jim Youll
      • [Asrg] Re: "ham" is ridiculous -was- Re: False Positive, Matt Sergeant
      • [Asrg] "ham" <i>is</i> ridiculous, matthew richards
      • Re: [Asrg] "ham" <i>is</i> ridiculous, Kee Hinckley
      • [Asrg] honey smoked "ham" <i>is</i> ridiculous, matthew richards
• [Asrg] Terminology..., Eric D. Williams
• [Asrg] Is this a new spam form?, Chuq Von Rospach
  • Re: [Asrg] Is this a new spam form?, Alan DeKok
    • Re: [Asrg] Is this a new spam form?, Chuq Von Rospach
    • RE: [Asrg] Is this a new spam form?, Jason Hihn
  • Re: [Asrg] Is this a new spam form?, Kee Hinckley
    • Re: [Asrg] Is this a new spam form?, Matt Sergeant
      • Re: [Asrg] Is this a new spam form?, Markus Stumpf
      • Re: [Asrg] Is this a new spam form?, Matt Sergeant
      • Re: [Asrg] Is this a new spam form?, wayne