Anti-Spam Research Group Discussion Archive - Thread Index

• Re: [Asrg] where the message originated, (continued)
  • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated, Rich Kulawiec
  • [Asrg] Meta channel, not bounces (was: Re: where the message originated), Alessandro Vesely
  • Re: [Asrg] Meta channel, not bounces (was: Re: where the message originated), Rich Kulawiec
  • Re: [Asrg] Meta channel, not bounces (was: Re: where the message originated), David Wilson
  • Re: [Asrg] Meta channel, not bounces, Chris Lewis
  • Re: [Asrg] Meta channel, not bounces (was: Re: where the message originated), David Wilson
  • Re: [Asrg] Meta channel, not bounces, Chris Lewis
  • Re: [Asrg] Meta channel, not bounces (was: Re: where the message originated), Rich Kulawiec
  • Re: [Asrg] Meta channel, not bounces, Chris Lewis
  • Re: [Asrg] Meta channel, not bounces, Alessandro Vesely
  • Re: [Asrg] Meta channel, not bounces, Rich Kulawiec
  • Re: [Asrg] Meta channel, not bounces, Chris Lewis
  • Re: [Asrg] Meta channel, not bounces, Franck Martin
  • Re: [Asrg] Meta channel, not bounces, Seth
  • Re: [Asrg] Meta channel, not bounces, Alessandro Vesely
  • Re: [Asrg] Meta channel, not bounces, Rich Kulawiec
  • Re: [Asrg] Meta channel, not bounces (was: Re: where the message originated), SM
  • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated, Chris Lewis
  • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated, Franck Martin
    • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated, John Levine
      • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated, Dave CROCKER
      • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated, Franck Martin
    • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated, Robert Barclay
      • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated, John Levine
      • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated, Robert Barclay
      • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated, Dave CROCKER
      • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated, John Levine
      • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated, Dave CROCKER
  • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated, Gordon Peterson
    • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated, Chris Lewis
    • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated, der Mouse
    • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated, Rich Kulawiec
    • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated, Chris Lewis
      • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated, der Mouse
      • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated, Chris Lewis
      • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated, Seth
  • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated, Gordon Peterson
    • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated, Rich Kulawiec
      • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated, David Wilson
      • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated, Rich Kulawiec
      • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated, David Wilson
      • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated, Rich Kulawiec
      • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated, Paul Russell
      • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated, David Wilson
      • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated, Chris Lewis
      • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated, David Wilson
      • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated, Chris Lewis
      • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated, David Wilson
      • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated, Douglas Otis
      • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated, Rich Kulawiec
      • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated, David Wilson
      • Re: [Asrg] enough about backscatter, John Levine
      • Re: [Asrg] enough about backscatter, David Wilson
      • Re: [Asrg] enough about backscatter, John Levine
      • Re: [Asrg] enough about backscatter, Franck Martin
      • Re: [Asrg] enough about backscatter, Rich Kulawiec
      • Re: [Asrg] enough about backscatter, Chris Lewis
      • Re: [Asrg] enough about backscatter, J.D. Falk
      • Re: [Asrg] enough about backscatter, Douglas Otis
      • Re: [Asrg] enough about backscatter, Chris Lewis
      • Re: [Asrg] enough about backscatter, Steve Atkins
      • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated, Rich Kulawiec
      • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated, SM
      • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated, David Wilson
      • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated, SM
      • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated, Paul Russell
• Re: [Asrg] where the message originated (was: DKIM role?) (SM), Gordon Peterson
  • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated, Alessandro Vesely
  • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated (was: DKIM role?) (SM), Ian Eiloart
  • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated (was: DKIM role?) (SM), Ian Eiloart
    • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated (was: DKIM role?) (SM), Rich Kulawiec
      • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated (was: DKIM role?) (SM), Ian Eiloart
      • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated (was: DKIM role?) (SM), der Mouse
      • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated (was: DKIM role?) (SM), David Nicol
    • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated (was: DKIM role?) (SM), Seth
      • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated (was: DKIM role?) (SM), Ian Eiloart
      • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated (was: DKIM role?) (SM), Seth
      • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated (was: DKIM role?) (SM), Ian Eiloart
      • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated (was: DKIM role?) (SM), der Mouse
      • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated, Chris Lewis
      • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated, Ian Eiloart
      • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated (was: DKIM role?) (SM), Graeme Fowler
      • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated (was: DKIM role?) (SM), Ian Eiloart
      • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated (was: DKIM role?) (SM), der Mouse
      • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated, Paul Russell
      • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated, Ian Eiloart
    • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated (was: DKIM role?) (SM), Dotzero
      • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated (was: DKIM role?) (SM), Ian Eiloart
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated (was: DKIM role?) (SM), Franck Martin
  • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated (was: DKIM role?) (SM), Ian Eiloart
    • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated (was: DKIM role?) (SM), David Wilson
      • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated (was: DKIM role?) (SM), Rich Kulawiec
      • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated (was: DKIM role?) (SM), David Wilson
      • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated (was: DKIM role?) (SM), Rich Kulawiec
      • Re: [Asrg] SPF and backscatter (was: where the message originated), David Wilson
      • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated (was: DKIM role?) (SM), Ian Eiloart
      • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated (was: DKIM role?) (SM), Ian Eiloart
      • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated (was: DKIM role?) (SM), Rich Kulawiec
      • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated (was: DKIM role?) (SM), Ian Eiloart
      • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated (was: DKIM role?) (SM), Rich Kulawiec
      • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated (was: DKIM role?) (SM), Ian Eiloart
      • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated (was: DKIM role?) (SM), Rich Kulawiec
      • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated (was: DKIM role?) (SM), Ian Eiloart
      • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated (was: DKIM role?) (SM), Paul Russell
      • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated (was: DKIM role?) (SM), Daniel Feenberg
      • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated (was: DKIM role?) (SM), Alessandro Vesely
      • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated (was: DKIM role?) (SM), Ian Eiloart
      • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated (was: DKIM role?) (SM), Peter J. Holzer
      • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated (was: DKIM role?) (SM), der Mouse
      • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated (was: DKIM role?) (SM), Peter J. Holzer
      • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated (was: DKIM role?) (SM), Ian Eiloart
      • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated (was: DKIM role?) (SM), David Wilson
      • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated (was: DKIM role?) (SM), Ian Eiloart
      • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated (was: DKIM role?) (SM), Alessandro Vesely
      • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated (was: DKIM role?) (SM), Rich Kulawiec
      • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated (was: DKIM role?) (SM), Ian Eiloart
      • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated (was: DKIM role?) (SM), Peter J. Holzer
      • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated (was: DKIM role?) (SM), Chris Lewis
      • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated (was: DKIM role?) (SM), Paul Russell
      • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated (was: DKIM role?) (SM), Graeme Fowler
      • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated (was: DKIM role?) (SM), Chris Lewis
      • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated (was: DKIM role?) (SM), Paul Russell
    • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated (was: DKIM role?) (SM), Rich Kulawiec
      • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated (was: DKIM role?) (SM), Ian Eiloart
  • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated (was: DKIM role?) (SM), Ian Eiloart
    • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated (was: DKIM role?) (SM), SM
      • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated (was: DKIM role?) (SM), Ian Eiloart
      • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated (was: DKIM role?) (SM), Dotzero
      • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated (was: DKIM role?) (SM), Ian Eiloart
      • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated (was: DKIM role?) (SM), Dotzero
      • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated (was: DKIM role?) (SM), SM
      • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated (was: DKIM role?) (SM), Ian Eiloart
      • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated (was: DKIM role?) (SM), Dotzero
      • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated (was: DKIM role?) (SM), Chris Lewis
      • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated (was: DKIM role?) (SM), Dotzero
      • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated (was: DKIM role?) (SM), Ian Eiloart
      • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated (was: DKIM role?) (SM), Ian Eiloart
      • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated (was: DKIM role?) (SM), Dotzero
      • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated (was: DKIM role?) (SM), Ian Eiloart
      • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated (was: DKIM role?) (SM), Dotzero
      • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated (was: DKIM role?) (SM), Ian Eiloart
      • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated (was: DKIM role?) (SM), Chris Lewis
      • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated (was: DKIM role?) (SM), Ian Eiloart
      • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated (was: DKIM role?) (SM), John Levine
      • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated (was: DKIM role?) (SM), der Mouse
      • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated (was: DKIM role?) (SM), Ian Eiloart
      • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated (was: DKIM role?) (SM), Rich Kulawiec
      • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated (was: DKIM role?) (SM), Ian Eiloart
      • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated (was: DKIM role?) (SM), Rich Kulawiec
      • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated (was: DKIM role?) (SM), Ian Eiloart
      • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated (was: DKIM role?) (SM), Rich Kulawiec
      • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated (was: DKIM role?) (SM), Ian Eiloart
      • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated (was: DKIM role?) (SM), der Mouse
      • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated (was: DKIM role?) (SM), Ian Eiloart
      • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated (was: DKIM role?) (SM), der Mouse
      • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated (was: DKIM role?) (SM), Alessandro Vesely
      • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated (was: DKIM role?) (SM), Ian Eiloart
      • Re: [Asrg] SPF, was where the message, John Levine
      • Re: [Asrg] SPF, was where the message, Franck Martin
      • Re: [Asrg] SPF, was where the message, Ian Eiloart
      • Re: [Asrg] SPF, was where the message, J.D. Falk
      • Re: [Asrg] SPF, was where the message, Ian Eiloart
      • [Asrg] DK & DKIM (was Re: SPF, was where the message), J.D. Falk
      • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated (was: DKIM role?) (SM), Dave CROCKER
      • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated (was: DKIM role?) (SM), Ian Eiloart
      • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated (was: DKIM role?) (SM), Dave CROCKER
      • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated (was: DKIM role?) (SM), Ian Eiloart
      • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated (was: DKIM role?) (SM), Rich Kulawiec
      • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated (was: DKIM role?) (SM), SM
      • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated (was: DKIM role?) (SM), Franck Martin
      • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated (was: DKIM role?) (SM), Ian Eiloart
      • Re: [Asrg] mail security, John Levine
      • Re: [Asrg] mail security, John Leslie
      • Re: [Asrg] mail security, Ian Eiloart
      • Re: [Asrg] mail security, John Levine
      • Re: [Asrg] mail security, Ian Eiloart
      • Re: [Asrg] mail security, Alessandro Vesely
      • Re: [Asrg] mail security, John Leslie
      • Re: [Asrg] mail security, Ian Eiloart
      • Re: [Asrg] mail security, John Leslie
      • Re: [Asrg] mail security, Ian Eiloart
      • Re: [Asrg] mail security, Alessandro Vesely
      • Re: [Asrg] mail security, Ian Eiloart
      • Re: [Asrg] mail security, Bill Cole
      • Re: [Asrg] mail security, Dave CROCKER
      • Re: [Asrg] mail security, Ian Eiloart
      • Re: [Asrg] mail security, Rich Kulawiec
      • Re: [Asrg] mail security, Ian Eiloart
      • Re: [Asrg] mail security, Rich Kulawiec
      • Re: [Asrg] mail security, Ian Eiloart
      • Re: [Asrg] mail security, Bill Cole
  • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated (was: DKIM role?) (SM), Franck Martin
• Re: [Asrg] where the message originated (was: DKIM role?), Franck Martin
  • Message not available
    • Re: [Asrg] where the message originated (was: DKIM role?), SM
• [Asrg] Fwd: [matthias at LEISI.NET: MISC: How many legitimate SMTP senders?], Rich Kulawiec
• [Asrg] Redirection at SMTP session, Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz
  • Re: [Asrg] Redirection at SMTP session, J.D. Falk
    • Re: [Asrg] Redirection at SMTP session, Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz
      • Re: [Asrg] Redirection at SMTP session, SM
      • Re: [Asrg] Redirection at SMTP session, Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz
      • Re: [Asrg] Redirection at SMTP session, Chris Lewis
      • Re: [Asrg] Redirection at SMTP session, Matthias Leisi
      • Re: [Asrg] Redirection at SMTP session, Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz
      • Re: [Asrg] Redirection at SMTP session, SM
• [Asrg] A paper/project worth considering (found it!), Rich Kulawiec
  • Re: [Asrg] A paper/project worth considering (found it!), J.D. Falk
    • Re: [Asrg] A paper/project worth considering (found it!), Rich Kulawiec
      • Re: [Asrg] A paper/project worth considering (found it!), J.D. Falk
      • Re: [Asrg] A paper/project worth considering (found it!), Rich Kulawiec
      • Re: [Asrg] A paper/project worth considering (found it!), Seth
      • Re: [Asrg] A paper/project worth considering (found it!), Chris Lewis
      • [Asrg] differential confidence, Dave CROCKER
      • Re: [Asrg] differential confidence, Steve Atkins
      • Re: [Asrg] differential confidence, Chris Lewis
      • Re: [Asrg] differential confidence, Dave CROCKER
      • Re: [Asrg] differential confidence, Chris Lewis
      • Re: [Asrg] differential confidence, Dave CROCKER
      • Re: [Asrg] differential confidence, Chris Lewis
      • Re: [Asrg] differential confidence, Chris Lewis
      • Re: [Asrg] differential confidence, J.D. Falk
      • Re: [Asrg] differential confidence, David Nicol
      • Re: [Asrg] differential confidence, der Mouse
      • Re: [Asrg] differential confidence, Dave CROCKER
      • Re: [Asrg] differential confidence, Michael Thomas
      • Re: [Asrg] differential confidence, J.D. Falk
      • Re: [Asrg] differential confidence, Michael Thomas
      • Re: [Asrg] differential confidence, John Levine
      • Re: [Asrg] A paper/project worth considering (found it!), Seth
      • Re: [Asrg] A paper/project worth considering (found it!), Chris Lewis
      • Re: [Asrg] A paper/project worth considering (found it!), Rich Kulawiec
      • Re: [Asrg] A paper/project worth considering (found it!), Franck Martin
      • Re: [Asrg] A paper/project worth considering (found it!), Chris Lewis
      • Re: [Asrg] A paper/project worth considering (found it!), Alessandro Vesely
      • Re: [Asrg] A paper/project worth considering (found it!), John Johnson
      • Re: [Asrg] A paper/project worth considering (found it!), Alessandro Vesely
      • Re: [Asrg] A paper/project worth considering (found it!), David Nicol
      • Re: [Asrg] A paper/project worth considering (found it!), Alessandro Vesely
      • Re: [Asrg] A paper/project worth considering (found it!), Barry Shein
      • Re: [Asrg] A paper/project worth considering (found it!), mathew
      • Re: [Asrg] A paper/project worth considering (found it!), Barry Shein
      • Re: [Asrg] A paper/project worth considering (found it!), Steve Atkins
      • Re: [Asrg] A paper/project worth considering (found it!), Michael Thomas
      • Re: [Asrg] A paper/project worth considering (found it!), Chris Lewis
      • Re: [Asrg] A paper/project worth considering (found it!), Steve Atkins
      • Re: [Asrg] A paper/project worth considering (found it!), Rich Kulawiec
      • Re: [Asrg] A paper/project worth considering (found it!), John Levine
      • Re: [Asrg] A paper/project worth considering (found it!), Michael Thomas
      • Re: [Asrg] A paper/project worth considering (found it!), der Mouse
      • Re: [Asrg] A paper/project worth considering (found it!), Daniel Feenberg
      • Re: [Asrg] A paper/project worth considering (found it!), Douglas Otis
  • Re: [Asrg] A paper/project worth considering (found it!), John Levine
    • Re: [Asrg] A paper/project worth considering (found it!), Jeff Macdonald
  • Re: [Asrg] A paper/project worth considering (found it!), David Nicol
• [Asrg] ASRG progress?, Dave CROCKER
  • Re: [Asrg] ASRG progress?, SM
  • Re: [Asrg] ASRG progress?, John Levine
  • Re: [Asrg] ASRG progress? META-DISCUSSION(META-DISCUSSION(POSTAGE)), Barry Shein
    • Re: [Asrg] ASRG progress? META-DISCUSSION(META-DISCUSSION(POSTAGE)), Dave CROCKER
• Re: [Asrg] Spam filter avoidance by impersonating mailing list traffic, mathew
  • [Asrg] Solving spam == Solving zombies/botnets, Walter Dnes
    • Re: [Asrg] Solving spam == Solving zombies/botnets, Lyndon Nerenberg
      • Re: [Asrg] Solving spam == Solving zombies/botnets, Rich Kulawiec
    • Re: [Asrg] Solving spam == Solving zombies/botnets, Andrew D Kirch
      • Re: [Asrg] Solving spam == Solving zombies/botnets, Gerald Klaas
      • Re: [Asrg] Solving spam == Solving zombies/botnets, Douglas Otis
      • Re: [Asrg] Solving spam == Solving zombies/botnets, Rich Kulawiec
      • Re: [Asrg] Solving spam == Solving zombies/botnets, Barry Shein
    • Re: [Asrg] Solving spam == Solving zombies/botnets, Dave CROCKER
    • Re: [Asrg] Solving spam == Solving zombies/botnets, Rich Kulawiec
    • Re: [Asrg] Solving spam == Solving zombies/botnets, J.D. Falk
      • Re: [Asrg] Solving spam == Solving zombies/botnets, Barry Shein
      • Re: [Asrg] Solving spam == Solving zombies/botnets, Steve Atkins
      • Re: [Asrg] Solving spam == Solving zombies/botnets, David Nicol
      • Re: [Asrg] Solving spam == Solving zombies/botnets, Barry Shein
      • Re: [Asrg] Solving spam == Solving zombies/botnets, Steve Atkins
      • Re: [Asrg] Solving spam == Solving zombies/botnets, Seth
      • Re: [Asrg] Solving spam == Solving zombies/botnets, Barry Shein
      • Re: [Asrg] Solving spam == Solving zombies/botnets, Chris Lewis
      • Re: [Asrg] Solving spam == Solving zombies/botnets, J.D. Falk
      • Re: [Asrg] Solving spam == Solving zombies/botnets, Chris Lewis
      • Re: [Asrg] Solving spam == Solving zombies/botnets, der Mouse
      • Re: [Asrg] Solving spam == Solving zombies/botnets, Seth
• [Asrg] Projecting, Bart Schaefer
  • Re: [Asrg] Projecting, Seth
    • Re: [Asrg] Projecting, Bart Schaefer
      • Re: [Asrg] Projecting, Seth
      • Re: [Asrg] Projecting, Bart Schaefer
      • Re: [Asrg] Projecting, der Mouse
      • Re: [Asrg] Projecting, Barry Shein
      • Re: [Asrg] Projecting, John Levine
      • Re: [Asrg] Projecting, John Levine
      • Re: [Asrg] Projecting, Michael Thomas
      • Re: [Asrg] Projecting, Bart Schaefer
      • Re: [Asrg] Projecting, Michael Thomas
      • Re: [Asrg] Projecting, Bart Schaefer
      • Re: [Asrg] Projecting, Barry Shein
      • Re: [Asrg] Projecting, Douglas Otis
      • Re: [Asrg] Projecting, Barry Shein
      • Re: [Asrg] Projecting, Douglas Otis
      • Re: [Asrg] Projecting [POSTAGE], Barry Shein
      • Re: [Asrg] Projecting, Bart Schaefer
      • Re: [Asrg] Projecting [POSTAGE], Barry Shein
      • Re: [Asrg] Projecting [POSTAGE], John Levine
      • Re: [Asrg] Projecting [POSTAGE], Barry Shein
    • Re: [Asrg] Projecting, Barry Shein
  • Re: [Asrg] Projecting, John Levine
• [Asrg] is SMTP still really store-and-forward ?, David Nicol
  • Re: [Asrg] is SMTP still really store-and-forward ?, John Levine
  • Re: [Asrg] is SMTP still really store-and-forward ?, Chris Lewis
    • Re: [Asrg] is SMTP still really store-and-forward ?, David Nicol
      • Re: [Asrg] is SMTP still really store-and-forward ?, Steve Atkins
      • Re: [Asrg] is SMTP still really store-and-forward ?, David Nicol
      • Message not available
      • Re: [Asrg] is SMTP still really store-and-forward ?, SM
      • Re: [Asrg] is SMTP still really store-and-forward ?, David Nicol
      • Message not available
      • Re: [Asrg] is SMTP still really store-and-forward ?, SM
      • Re: [Asrg] is SMTP still really store-and-forward ?, Alessandro Vesely
      • Re: [Asrg] is SMTP still really store-and-forward ?, SM
      • Re: [Asrg] is SMTP still really store-and-forward ?, Alessandro Vesely
  • Message not available
    • Re: [Asrg] is SMTP still really store-and-forward ?, SM
      • Re: [Asrg] is SMTP still really store-and-forward ?, Michael Thomas
      • Re: [Asrg] is SMTP still really store-and-forward ?, David Nicol
  • Re: [Asrg] is SMTP still really store-and-forward ?, Dave CROCKER
    • Re: [Asrg] is SMTP still really store-and-forward ?, Tony Hansen
      • Re: [Asrg] is SMTP still really store-and-forward ?, Dave CROCKER
    • Re: [Asrg] is SMTP still really store-and-forward ?, David Nicol
  • Re: [Asrg] is SMTP still really store-and-forward ?, J.D. Falk
• [Asrg] The fundamental misconception about paying for mail, John Levine
  • Re: [Asrg] The fundamental misconception about paying for mail, der Mouse
    • Re: [Asrg] The fundamental misconception about paying for mail, Barry Shein
      • Re: [Asrg] The fundamental misconception about paying for mail, Seth
      • Re: [Asrg] POSTAGE, was The fundamental misconception about paying for mail, John Levine
      • Re: [Asrg] POSTAGE, was The fundamental misconception about paying for mail, Barry Shein
      • Re: [Asrg] POSTAGE, was The fundamental misconception about paying for mail, Gerald Klaas
      • Re: [Asrg] POSTAGE, was The fundamental misconception about paying for mail, Barry Shein
      • Re: [Asrg] POSTAGE, was The fundamental misconception about paying for mail, John Levine
      • Re: [Asrg] POSTAGE, was The fundamental misconception about paying for mail, Bart Schaefer
      • Re: [Asrg] POSTAGE, was The fundamental misconception about paying for mail, John Levine
      • Re: [Asrg] POSTAGE, was The fundamental misconception about paying for mail, Bart Schaefer
      • Re: [Asrg] POSTAGE, was The fundamental misconception about paying for mail, John Levine
      • Re: [Asrg] POSTAGE, was The fundamental misconception about paying for mail, Bart Schaefer
      • [Asrg] Double-spending of electronic coins, John Leslie
      • Re: [Asrg] Double-spending of electronic coins, Gerald Klaas
      • Re: [Asrg] Double-spending of electronic coins, Bart Schaefer
      • Re: [Asrg] POSTAGE, was The fundamental misconception about paying for mail, Barry Shein
      • Re: [Asrg] POSTAGE, was The fundamental misconception about paying for mail, Barry Shein
      • Re: [Asrg] POSTAGE, was The fundamental misconception about paying for mail, John Levine
      • Re: [Asrg] POSTAGE, was The fundamental misconception about paying for mail, Barry Shein
      • Re: [Asrg] POSTAGE, was The fundamental misconception about paying for mail, John Levine
      • Re: [Asrg] POSTAGE, was The fundamental misconception about paying for mail, Paul Russell
      • Re: [Asrg] POSTAGE, was The fundamental misconception about paying for mail, Michael Thomas
      • Re: [Asrg] POSTAGE, was The fundamental misconception about paying for mail, Paul Russell
      • Re: [Asrg] POSTAGE, was The fundamental misconception about paying for mail, Barry Shein
      • Re: [Asrg] POSTAGE, was The fundamental misconception about paying for mail, Rich Kulawiec
      • [Asrg] The fundamental misconception about POSTAGE METERS, Bart Schaefer
      • Re: [Asrg] The fundamental misconception about POSTAGE METERS, Gerald Klaas
      • Re: [Asrg] The fundamental misconception about POSTAGE METERS, John Levine
      • Re: [Asrg] The fundamental misconception about POSTAGE METERS, Gerald Klaas
      • Re: [Asrg] publish or perish, was The fundamental misconception, John Levine
      • Re: [Asrg] publish or perish, was The fundamental misconception, Gerald Klaas
      • Re: [Asrg] POSTAGE publish or perish, was The fundamental misconception, John Levine
      • Re: [Asrg] publish or perish, was The fundamental misconception, David Nicol
      • [Asrg] Internet Draft -- SMTP Postage Extension, John Leslie
      • Re: [Asrg] The fundamental misconception about POSTAGE METERS, David Nicol
      • Re: [Asrg] The fundamental misconception about POSTAGE METERS, Bart Schaefer
      • Re: [Asrg] The fundamental misconception about POSTAGE METERS, Barry Shein
      • Re: [Asrg] POSTAGE, was The fundamental misconception about paying for mail, Barry Shein
  • Re: [Asrg] The fundamental misconception about paying for mail, mathew
    • Re: [Asrg] The fundamental misconception about paying for mail, der Mouse
      • Re: [Asrg] The fundamental misconception about paying for mail, mathew
      • Re: [Asrg] The fundamental misconception about paying for mail [postage], Rich Kulawiec
      • Re: [Asrg] The fundamental misconception about paying for mail [postage], Chris Lewis
      • Re: [Asrg] The fundamental misconception about paying for mail [postage], John Levine
      • Re: [Asrg] The fundamental misconception about paying for mail [postage], Rich Kulawiec
      • Re: [Asrg] The fundamental misconception about paying for mail [postage], Chris Lewis
      • Re: [Asrg] list spamming, John Levine
      • Re: [Asrg] The fundamental misconception about paying for mail [NOTHING TO DO WITH: postage], Barry Shein
      • Re: [Asrg] The fundamental misconception about paying for mail, Alessandro Vesely
      • Re: [Asrg] The fundamental misconception about paying for mail, Rich Kulawiec
      • Re: [Asrg] The fundamental misconception about paying for mail, Alessandro Vesely
      • Re: [Asrg] The fundamental misconception about paying for mail, Rich Kulawiec
      • [Asrg] Whack-a-mole (was Re: The fundamental misconception about paying for mail), Bart Schaefer
      • Re: [Asrg] Whack-a-mole (was Re: The fundamental misconception about paying for mail), Steve Atkins
      • Re: [Asrg] Whack-a-mole (was Re: The fundamental misconception about paying for mail), Bart Schaefer
    • Re: [Asrg] The fundamental misconception about paying for mail, John Levine
      • Re: [Asrg] The fundamental misconception about paying for mail, mathew
      • Re: [Asrg] POSTAGE The fundamental misconception about paying for mail, John Levine
      • Re: [Asrg] POSTAGE The fundamental misconception about paying for mail, Steve Atkins
      • Re: [Asrg] POSTAGE The fundamental misconception about paying for mail, mathew
      • Re: [Asrg] The fundamental misconception about paying for mail, Barry Shein
    • Re: [Asrg] The fundamental misconception about paying for mail, Alessandro Vesely
      • [Asrg] Mailing list signup handshakes, John Levine
      • Re: [Asrg] Mailing list signup handshakes, Alessandro Vesely
      • Re: [Asrg] Mailing list signup handshakes, Michael Thomas
      • Re: [Asrg] Mailing list signup handshakes, Steve Atkins
      • Re: [Asrg] Mailing list signup handshakes, Michael Thomas
      • Re: [Asrg] Mailing list signup handshakes, Steve Atkins
      • Re: [Asrg] Mailing list signup handshakes, Michael Thomas
      • Re: [Asrg] Mailing list signup handshakes, Alessandro Vesely
      • Re: [Asrg] Mailing list signup handshakes, Michael Thomas
      • Re: [Asrg] Mailing list signup handshakes, Rich Kulawiec
      • Re: [Asrg] Mailing list signup handshakes, Michael Thomas
      • Re: [Asrg] Mailing list signup handshakes, Rich Kulawiec
      • Re: [Asrg] Mailing list signup handshakes, Alessandro Vesely
      • Re: [Asrg] Mailing list signup handshakes, John Levine
      • Re: [Asrg] Mailing list signup handshakes, Bart Schaefer
      • Re: [Asrg] Mailing list signup handshakes, Alessandro Vesely
      • Re: [Asrg] Mailing list signup handshakes, Bart Schaefer
      • Re: [Asrg] Mailing list signup handshakes, Alessandro Vesely
      • Re: [Asrg] Mailing list signup handshakes, Steve Atkins
      • Re: [Asrg] Mailing list signup handshakes, Bart Schaefer
      • Re: [Asrg] Mailing list signup handshakes, Rich Kulawiec
      • Re: [Asrg] Mailing list signup handshakes, Barry Shein
      • Re: [Asrg] The fundamental misconception about paying for mail, mathew
      • Re: [Asrg] The fundamental misconception about paying for mail, David Nicol
      • Re: [Asrg] The fundamental misconception about paying for mail, Alessandro Vesely
  • Re: [Asrg] The fundamental misconception about paying for mail POSTAGE, Barry Shein
    • Re: [Asrg] The fundamental misconception about paying for mail POSTAGE, Seth
      • Re: [Asrg] The fundamental misconception about paying for mail POSTAGE, Paul Russell
      • Re: [Asrg] The fundamental misconception about paying for mail POSTAGE, SM
      • Re: [Asrg] The fundamental misconception about paying for mail POSTAGE, mathew
      • Message not available
      • Re: [Asrg] The fundamental misconception about paying for mail POSTAGE, SM
      • Re: [Asrg] The fundamental misconception about paying for mail POSTAGE, mathew
      • Re: [Asrg] The fundamental misconception about paying for mail POSTAGE, Barry Shein
      • Re: [Asrg] The fundamental misconception about paying for mail POSTAGE, Rich Kulawiec
      • Re: [Asrg] The fundamental misconception about paying for mail POSTAGE, Seth
      • Re: [Asrg] The fundamental misconception about paying for mail POSTAGE, Barry Shein
      • Re: [Asrg] The fundamental misconception about paying for mail POSTAGE, Barry Shein
      • Re: [Asrg] The fundamental misconception about paying for mail POSTAGE, John Levine
      • Re: [Asrg] The fundamental misconception about paying for mail POSTAGE, Barry Shein
• [Asrg] Questions about X-ASVP, John Levine
• [Asrg] ASRG linked-in group, David Nicol
  • Re: [Asrg] ASRG linked-in group, Rich Kulawiec
    • Re: [Asrg] ASRG linked-in group, J.D. Falk
      • Re: [Asrg] ASRG linked-in group, Rich Kulawiec
      • Re: [Asrg] ASRG linked-in group, John Levine
      • Re: [Asrg] ASRG linked-in group, Rich Kulawiec
• [Asrg] Goodmail / Email Postage, Daniel T. Dreymann
  • Re: [Asrg] Goodmail / Email Postage, Dave CROCKER
  • Re: [Asrg] Goodmail / Email Postage, David Nicol
    • Re: [Asrg] Goodmail / Email Postage, Dave CROCKER
    • Re: [Asrg] Goodmail / Email Postage, Tony Hansen
      • Re: [Asrg] Goodmail / Email Postage, Gerald Klaas
• [Asrg] attention bonds, was Email Postage, John R Levine
  • Re: [Asrg] attention bonds, was Email Postage, mathew
    • Message not available
      • Re: [Asrg] attention bonds, was Email Postage, SM
    • Re: [Asrg] attention bonds, was Email Postage, John Levine
      • Re: [Asrg] attention bonds, was Email Postage, mathew
      • Re: [Asrg] attention bonds, was Email Postage, mathew
      • Re: [Asrg] attention bonds, was Email Postage, Al Iverson
      • Re: [Asrg] attention bonds, was Email Postage, Steve Atkins
      • Re: [Asrg] attention bonds, was Email Postage, mathew
      • Re: [Asrg] attention bonds, was Email Postage, David Nicol
      • Re: [Asrg] attention bonds, was Email Postage, Al Iverson
      • Re: [Asrg] attention bonds, was Email Postage, Rich Kulawiec
      • Re: [Asrg] attention bonds, was Email Postage, J.D. Falk
      • Message not available
      • [Asrg] Fwd: attention bonds, was Email Postage, Al Iverson
      • Re: [Asrg] attention bonds, was Email Postage, Seth
      • Re: [Asrg] attention bonds, was Email Postage, mathew
      • Re: [Asrg] attention bonds, was Email Postage, John Levine
      • Re: [Asrg] attention bonds, was Email Postage, Barry Shein
      • Re: [Asrg] e-postage -- NEW POLICY, John Levine
      • Re: [Asrg] attention bonds, was Email Postage, Rich Kulawiec
      • Re: [Asrg] attention bonds, was Email Postage, der Mouse
      • Re: [Asrg] attention bonds, was Email Postage, Barry Shein
      • [Asrg] Must we be uncompromising about uncompromising?, Bart Schaefer
      • Re: [Asrg] Must we be uncompromising about uncompromising?, der Mouse
      • Re: [Asrg] attention bonds, was Email Postage, David Nicol
      • Re: [Asrg] attention bonds, was Email Postage, John Levine
      • Re: [Asrg] attention bonds, was Email Postage, David Nicol
      • Re: [Asrg] attention bonds, was Email Postage, Seth
      • Re: [Asrg] attention bonds, was Email Postage, mathew
      • Re: [Asrg] attention bonds, was Email Postage, John Levine
      • Re: [Asrg] attention bonds, was Email Postage, Rich Kulawiec
      • Re: [Asrg] attention bonds, was Email Postage, mathew
      • Re: [Asrg] attention bonds, was Email Postage, Rich Kulawiec
      • Re: [Asrg] attention bonds, was Email Postage, mathew
      • Re: [Asrg] attention bonds, was Email Postage, Rich Kulawiec
      • Re: [Asrg] attention bonds, was Email Postage, mathew
      • Re: [Asrg] attention bonds, was Email Postage, Peter J. Holzer
      • Re: [Asrg] attention bonds, was Email Postage, mathew
      • Message not available
      • Re: [Asrg] attention bonds, was Email Postage, SM
      • Re: [Asrg] attention bonds, was Email Postage, Rich Kulawiec
      • Re: [Asrg] attention bonds, was Email Postage, mathew
      • Re: [Asrg] attention bonds, was Email Postage, Rich Kulawiec
      • Re: [Asrg] attention bonds, was Email Postage, John Levine
      • Re: [Asrg] attention bonds, was Email Postage, Barry Shein
      • Re: [Asrg] attention bonds, was Email Postage, Rich Kulawiec
      • Re: [Asrg] attention bonds, was Email Postage, Barry Shein
      • Re: [Asrg] attention bonds, was Email Postage, mathew
      • Re: [Asrg] attention bonds, was Email Postage, Seth
      • Re: [Asrg] attention bonds, was Email Postage, Rich Kulawiec
    • Re: [Asrg] attention bonds, was Email Postage, Rich Kulawiec
      • Re: [Asrg] attention bonds, was Email Postage, mathew
      • Re: [Asrg] attention bonds, was Email Postage, Rich Kulawiec
      • Re: [Asrg] attention bonds, was Email Postage, mathew
      • Re: [Asrg] attention bonds, was Email Postage, Alessandro Vesely
      • Re: [Asrg] attention bonds, was Email Postage, Seth
      • Re: [Asrg] attention bonds, was Email Postage, Barry Shein
      • [Asrg] Definition of spam (was: Re: attention bonds, was Email Postage, Alessandro Vesely
      • Re: [Asrg] attention bonds, was Email Postage, Seth