Anti-Spam Research Group Discussion Archive - Thread Index
[Prev Page] [Next Page] [Date Index]
[IETF Announcements Archive]
- RE: [Asrg] IBM invents return to sender, (continued)
- [Asrg] Re: user-level blacklisting patented,
Bruce Lilly
- [Asrg] BATV and mailing lists,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- [Asrg] Patent Wednesday,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- [Asrg] user-level blacklisting patented,
Peter Kay
- Re: [Asrg] user-level blacklisting patented,
John Levine
- Re: [Asrg] user-level blacklisting patented,
John Levine
- Re: [Asrg] user-level blacklisting patented,
Jon Kyme
- Re: [Asrg] user-level blacklisting patented,
Troy Rollo
- RE: [Asrg] user-level blacklisting patented,
Peter Kay
- Re: [Asrg] user-level blacklisting patented,
Claus Assmann
- Re: [Asrg] user-level blacklisting patented,
der Mouse
- Re: [Asrg] user-level blacklisting patented,
Jim Witte
- Re: [Asrg] user-level blacklisting patented,
Troy Rollo
- RE: [Asrg] user-level blacklisting patented,
Peter Kay
- RE: [Asrg] user-level blacklisting patented,
Peter Kay
- Re: [Asrg] user-level blacklisting patented,
Justin Mason
- Re: [Asrg] user-level blacklisting patented,
mathew
- Re: [Asrg] user-level blacklisting patented,
Daniel Feenberg
- Re: [Asrg] user-level blacklisting patented,
Tony Finch
- Re: [Asrg] user-level blacklisting patented,
Craig Cockburn
- Re: [Asrg] enough already about user-level blacklisting patented,
John Levine
- RE: [Asrg] TitanKey Patents,
Peter Kay
- Re: [Asrg] TitanKey Patents,
J C Lawrence
- Re: [Asrg] TitanKey Patents,
John Levine
- Re: [Asrg] TitanKey Patents,
Dave Crocker
- Re: [Asrg] TitanKey Patents,
Jed Margolin
- Re: [Asrg] TitanKey Patents,
mathew
- [Asrg] Anti-spam comparison,
Ian Rogers
- [Asrg] Re: Anti-spam comparison,
Ian Rogers
- Re: [Asrg] Re: Anti-spam comparison,
Matthew Elvey
- Re: [Asrg] Re: Anti-spam comparison,
Ian Rogers
- [Asrg] comparisons,
Matthew Elvey
- [Asrg] Re: comparisons,
Ian Rogers
- Re: [Asrg] Re: Anti-spam comparison,
Jonathan Morton
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: [Asrg] user-level blacklisting patented,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: [Asrg] user-level blacklisting patented,
Peter Kay
- [Asrg] Verizon's asymmetrical anti-spam causing problems,
Peter Kay
- [Asrg] DNSBL comparison,
Daniel Feenberg
- [Asrg] A question on trust and trust propagation.,
Devdas Bhagat
- Re: [Asrg] Spammer proxies using legitamate mail relays,
Jonathan Morton
- [Asrg] AntiSpit Info.,
aseem_jakhar
- [Asrg] Delivery by mail,
Esj
- [Asrg] SPF and ebay,
Reinhold Jordan
- [Asrg] more notes on zombies and spam,
Gadi Evron
- [Asrg] zombies && spam,
Gadi Evron
- RE: [Asrg] [Fwd: Time to check the rate limits on your mail serve rs],
Hannigan, Martin
- [Asrg] [Fwd: Time to check the rate limits on your mail servers],
Gadi Evron
- [Asrg] ASRG session at IETF 62 ?,
John R Levine
- [Asrg] Re: Asrg Digest, Vol 9, Issue 20,
Jeff Silverman
- [Asrg] IPv6 and the SPAM problem,
Jeff Silverman
- [Asrg] SBC Blocks Port 25,
Gadi Evron
- [Asrg] Survey of the State of the Art,
Andrew J. Huang
- [Asrg] subverting ISACS,
Laird Breyer
- [Asrg] Empty mail transactions,
Peter J. Holzer
- [Asrg] joe.debba at example.com and joe.beebe at example.com,
Amir Herzberg
- [Asrg] Reducing the amount of bogus challenges in Michael Kaplan's ISACS to (almost) zero,
Peter J. Holzer
- [Asrg] small correction re identifying bounced mail,
Amir Herzberg
- [Asrg] Suggested change to FUSSP CAPTCHA rule, or: using bounces to attack CAPTCHA systems,
Amir Herzberg
- [Asrg] META Signatures - New Website, Mail-Lists, Techical Spec Updates,
william(at)elan.net
- [Asrg] Email Security Glossary,
william(at)elan.net
- [Asrg] Re: Spam, defined, and permissions, and SICS,
gep2
- Re: [Asrg] Re: Spam, defined, and permissions, and SICS,
Seth Breidbart
- Re: [Asrg] Re: Spam, defined, and permissions, and SICS,
Devdas Bhagat
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [Asrg] Re: Spam, defined, and permissions, and SICS,
Hannigan, Martin
- RE: [Asrg] Re: Spam, defined, and permissions, and SICS,
Hannigan, Martin
- [Asrg] Spam Ecomomics,
Hannigan, Martin
- Re: [Asrg] Spam Ecomomics,
James Lick
- Re: [Asrg] Spam Ecomomics,
Gadi Evron
- Re: [Asrg] Spam Ecomomics - WHITELISTING FEES.,
Jim Whitescarver
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: [Asrg] Spam Ecomomics,
Hannigan, Martin
- RE: [Asrg] Spam Ecomomics,
Hannigan, Martin
- Re: [Asrg] Spam Ecomomics,
Hannigan, Martin
- Re: [Asrg] Spam Ecomomics,
Hannigan, Martin
- Re: [Asrg] Spam Ecomomics,
Hannigan, Martin
- Re: [Asrg] Spam Ecomomics,
Hannigan, Martin
- Re: [Asrg] Spam Ecomomics,
Hannigan, Martin
- [Asrg] US leads world in SPAM production?,
Hannigan, Martin
- Re: [Asrg] More 'pay per' foolishness,
Hannigan, Martin
- [Asrg] Why are we still here?,
Peter Kay
- Re: [Asrg] Why are we still here?,
Devdas Bhagat
- Re: [Asrg] Why are we still here?,
der Mouse
- Re: [Asrg] Why are we still here?,
Laird Breyer
- Re: [Asrg] Why are we still here?,
James Lick
- Re: [Asrg] Why are we still here?,
Tom Petch
- Re: [Asrg] Why are we still here?,
Jim Whitescarver
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: [Asrg] Why are we still here?,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: [Asrg] Why are we still here?,
Danny Angus
- RE: [Asrg] Why are we still here?,
Hannigan, Martin
- RE: [Asrg] Why are we still here?,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- [Asrg] Re: - More 'pay per' foolishness,
gep2
- Re: [Asrg] Call for contributors to develop `pay per fraudulantmessage` I-D, code,
Amir Herzberg
- RE: [Asrg] Call for contributors to develop `pay per fraudulantmessage` I-D, code,
Paul Lambert
- [Asrg] drone armies/botnets research and mitigation mailing list,
Gadi Evron
- RE: [Asrg] mail metering, was Spam, defined, and permissions,
Hannigan, Martin
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [Asrg] mail metering, was Spam, defined, and permissions,
Hannigan, Martin
- RE: [Asrg] mail metering, was Spam, defined, and permissions,
Hannigan, Martin
- RE: [Asrg] Call for contributors to develop `pay per fraudulant m essage` I-D, code,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- [Asrg] Call for contributors to develop `pay per fraudulant message` I-D, code,
Amir Herzberg
- [Asrg] Want to know,
Asif Pathan
- [Asrg] How charging for spam (or mis-labeled messages) might actually work...,
gep2
- RE: [Asrg] The pay-per message myth again,
Hannigan, Martin
- [Asrg] How charging for spam (or mis-labeled messages) might actually work...,
Amir Herzberg
- [Asrg] SICS, definitions, and accountability for `spam`,
Amir Herzberg
- [Asrg] Spam, defined, and permissions,
gep2
- Re: [Asrg] Spam, defined, and permissions,
John Levine
- Re: [Asrg] Spam, defined, and permissions,
Peter Bowyer
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [Asrg] Spam, defined, and permissions,
gep2
- Re: [Asrg] Spam, defined, and permissions,
Jon Kyme
- Re: [Asrg] Spam, defined, and permissions,
gep2
- Re: [Asrg] Spam, defined, and permissions,
gep2
- Re: [Asrg] Spam, defined, and permissions,
Jed Margolin
- Re: [Asrg] Spam, defined, and permissions,
Devdas Bhagat
- Re: [Asrg] Spam, defined, and permissions,
Seth Breidbart
- Re: [Asrg] Spam, defined, and permissions,
Seth Breidbart
- Re: [Asrg] Spam, defined, and permissions,
Barry Shein
- Re: [Asrg] Spam, defined, and permissions,
Devdas Bhagat
- Re: [Asrg] Mailing lists,
John Levine
- Re: [Asrg] Spam, defined, and permissions,
Barry Shein
- Re: [Asrg] Spam, defined, and permissions,
Barry Shein
- Re: [Asrg] Spam, defined, and permissions,
gep2
- Re: [Asrg] Spam, defined, and permissions,
gep2
- Re: [Asrg] Spam, defined, and permissions,
Hannigan, Martin
- Re: [Asrg] Spam, defined, and permissions,
Seth Breidbart
- Re: [Asrg] Spam, defined, and permissions,
John Levine
- Re: [Asrg] Spam, defined, and permissions,
Jon Kyme
- Re: [Asrg] The pay-per message myth again,
John Levine
- Re: [Asrg] The pay-per message myth again,
Jon Kyme
- Re: [Asrg] The pay-per message myth again,
Barry Shein
- Re: [Asrg] Spam, defined, and permissions,
Barry Shein
- Re: [Asrg] Spam, defined, and permissions,
Laird Breyer
- Re: [Asrg] Spam, defined, and permissions,
Barry Shein
- Re: [Asrg] Spam, defined, and permissions,
Laird Breyer
- Re: [Asrg] Spam, defined, and permissions,
Barry Shein
- Re: [Asrg] Spam, defined, and permissions,
Laird Breyer
- Re: [Asrg] Spam, defined, and permissions,
Barry Shein
- Re: [Asrg] Spam, defined, and permissions,
Laird Breyer
- Re: [Asrg] Spam, defined, and permissions,
Barry Shein
- Re: [Asrg] Spam, defined, and permissions,
Laird Breyer
- [Asrg] Maybe Senator Hatch had the right idea,
Walter Dnes
- Re: [Asrg] Spam, defined, and permissions,
gep2
- Re: [Asrg] Spam, defined, and permissions,
gep2
- Re: [Asrg] Spam, defined, and permissions,
Seth Breidbart
- Re: [Asrg] Spam, defined, and permissions,
gep2
- Re: [Asrg] Spam, defined, and permissions,
gep2
- Re: [Asrg] Spam, defined, and permissions,
gep2
- RE: [Asrg] Spam, defined, and permissions,
Hannigan, Martin
- RE: [Asrg] Spam, defined, and permissions,
Hannigan, Martin
- RE: [Asrg] Spam, defined, and permissions,
Hannigan, Martin
- RE: [Asrg] Spam, defined, and permissions,
gep2
- RE: [Asrg] Spam, defined, and permissions,
gep2
- RE: [Asrg] Spam, defined, and permissions,
Hannigan, Martin
- RE: [Asrg] Spam, defined, and permissions,
Hannigan, Martin
- RE: [Asrg] Spam, defined, and permissions,
Hannigan, Martin
- RE: [Asrg] Spam, defined, and permissions,
Hannigan, Martin
- RE: [Asrg] Spam, defined, and permissions,
Hannigan, Martin
- Re: [Asrg] Spam, defined, and permissions,
Devdas Bhagat
- Re: [Asrg] Spam, defined, and permissions,
Barry Shein
- Re: [Asrg] Spam, defined, and permissions,
James Lick
- Re: [Asrg] Spam, defined, and permissions,
Barry Shein
- Re: [Asrg] Spam, defined, and permissions,
Daniel Feenberg
- Re: [Asrg] Spam, defined, and permissions,
Laird Breyer
- RE: [Asrg] Spam, defined, and permissions,
Hannigan, Martin
- RE: [Asrg] Spam, defined, and permissions,
Hannigan, Martin
- RE: [Asrg] Spam, defined, and permissions,
Hannigan, Martin
- Re: [Asrg] Spam, defined, and permissions,
gep2
- RE: [Asrg] Spam, defined, and permissions,
Hannigan, Martin
- RE: [Asrg] Spam, defined, and permissions,
Hannigan, Martin
- Re: [Asrg] Spam, defined, and permissions,
Hannigan, Martin
- [Asrg] Re: Where I think we are...,
William Chang
- RE: [Asrg] SICS,
Paul Lambert
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: [Asrg] SICS,
Hannigan, Martin
- RE: [Asrg] SICS,
Hannigan, Martin
- RE: [Asrg] SICS,
Hannigan, Martin
- Re: [Asrg] SICS,
Hannigan, Martin
- Re: [Asrg] SICS,
gep2
- Re: [Asrg] SICS,
gep2
- Re: [Asrg] SICS,
gep2
- Re: [Asrg] SICS,
gep2
- RE: [Asrg] SICS,
gep2
- Re: [Asrg] SICS,
gep2
- Re: [Asrg] SICS,
gep2
- Re: [Asrg] SICS,
gep2
- Re: [Asrg] SICS,
gep2
- Re: [Asrg] SICS,
Laird Breyer
- Re: [Asrg] SICS,
gep2
- Re: [Asrg] SICS,
Hannigan, Martin
- RE: [Asrg] SICS,
Hannigan, Martin
- Re: [Asrg] SICS,
gep2
- Re: [Asrg] FTC tells us what is SPAM (NO! what is commercial!),
Amir Herzberg
- [Asrg] SICS,
Matthew Elvey
- Re: [Asrg] SICS,
John Levine
- Re: [Asrg] SICS,
Laird Breyer
- Re: [Asrg] SICS,
John Levine
- Re: [Asrg] SICS,
Laird Breyer
- Re: [Asrg] SICS,
Bill Cole
- Re: [Asrg] SICS,
Walter Dnes
- Re: [Asrg] SICS,
Laird Breyer
- Re: [Asrg] SICS,
Barry Shein
- Re: [Asrg] SICS,
Seth Breidbart
- Re: [Asrg] SICS,
Barry Shein
- Re: [Asrg] SICS,
Seth Breidbart
- Re: [Asrg] SICS,
Barry Shein
- Re: [Asrg] SICS,
Seth Breidbart
- Re: [Asrg] SICS,
Laird Breyer
- Re: [Asrg] SICS,
Devdas Bhagat
- Re: [Asrg] SICS,
Barry Shein
- Re: [Asrg] SICS,
Laird Breyer
- Re: [Asrg] SICS,
Barry Shein
- Re: [Asrg] SICS,
Laird Breyer
- Re: [Asrg] SICS,
Barry Shein
- Re: [Asrg] SICS,
Laird Breyer
- Re: [Asrg] SICS,
der Mouse
- Re: [Asrg] SICS,
Devdas Bhagat
- Re: [Asrg] SICS,
Laird Breyer
- Re: [Asrg] SICS,
Seth Breidbart
- Re: [Asrg] SICS,
Barry Shein
- Re: [Asrg] SICS,
Laird Breyer
- Re: [Asrg] SICS,
der Mouse
- Re: [Asrg] SICS,
der Mouse
- Re: [Asrg] SICS,
Barry Shein
- Re: [Asrg] SICS,
Laird Breyer
- Re: [Asrg] SICS,
william(at)elan.net
- Re: [Asrg] SICS,
Barry Shein
- Re: [Asrg] SICS,
william(at)elan.net
- Re: [Asrg] SICS,
Seth Breidbart
- Re: [Asrg] SICS,
Barry Shein
- Re: [Asrg] SICS,
Seth Breidbart
- Re: [Asrg] SICS,
Barry Shein
- Re: [Asrg] SICS,
Walter Dnes
- Re: [Asrg] SICS,
Seth Breidbart
- Re: [Asrg] SICS,
Walter Dnes
- [Asrg] FTC tells us what is SPAM,
William Leibzon
- [Asrg] Where I think we are...,
Barry Shein
- Re: [Asrg] A response to the critique of my anti-spam system],
Fridrik Skulason
- [Asrg] A response to the critique of my anti-spam system,
Michael Kaplan
- Re: [Asrg] A response to the critique of my anti-spam system,
Seth Breidbart
- Re: [Asrg] A response to the critique of my anti-spam system,
der Mouse
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: [Asrg] A response to the critique of my anti-spam system,
Paul Lambert
- RE: [Asrg] A response to the critique of my anti-spam system,
Michael Kaplan
- RE: [Asrg] A response to the critique of my anti-spam system,
Michael Kaplan
- RE: [Asrg] A response to the critique of my anti-spam system,
Brian Azzopardi
- RE: [Asrg] A response to the critique of my anti-spam system,
Michael Kaplan
- Re: [Asrg] A response to the critique of my anti-spam system,
Danny Angus
- Re: [Asrg] A response to the critique of my anti-spam system,
Michael Kaplan
- Re: [Asrg] A response to the critique of my anti-spam system,
Michael Kaplan
- Re: [Asrg] A response to the critique of my anti-spam system,
Michael Kaplan
- Re: [Asrg] A response to the critique of my anti-spam system,
Michael Kaplan
- [Asrg] Looking for a writer to write spam for Free Software Magazine?,
John R Levine
- RE: [Asrg] Re: Disaster looming: SPF,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- [Asrg] Spam solution requirements,
Devdas Bhagat
- [Asrg] Re: Please critique my anti-spam system,
Michael Kaplan
- [Asrg] SMTP AUTH,
gep2
- Re: [Asrg] SMTP AUTH,
Devdas Bhagat
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [Asrg] SMTP AUTH,
gep2
- Re: [Asrg] SMTP AUTH,
gep2
- Re: [Asrg] SMTP AUTH,
gep2
- Re: [Asrg] SMTP AUTH,
gep2
- Re: [Asrg] SMTP AUTH,
John Levine
- Re: [Asrg] SMTP AUTH,
aseem_jakhar
- RE: [Asrg] SMTP AUTH,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: [Asrg] SMTP AUTH,
gep2
- RE: [Asrg] SMTP AUTH,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: [Asrg] SMTP AUTH,
gep2
- Re: [Asrg] SMTP AUTH,
gep2
- RE: [Asrg] SMTP AUTH,
gep2
- Re: [Asrg] SMTP AUTH,
henryg-asrg
- Re: [Asrg] SMTP AUTH,
gep2
- [Asrg] Please critique my anti-spam system,
Michael Kaplan
Mail converted by MHonArc