Re: [Autoconf] Discussion on link types and status of documents

["Ian Chakeres" <ian.chakeres at gmail.com>]

I'd like to chime in on this conversation by saying that "MANET link"
is not a good term. MANET's (and the MANET WG protocols) run over lots
of kinds of different physical and logical links. It just so happens
that they may also often run over links with asymmetric reachability.

If a new "link type" needs to be defined, it should not contain the
term MANET. I see link type as an independent concept.

Ian Chakeres
_______________________________________________
Autoconf mailing list
Autoconf at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf