Re: [Autoconf] Discussion on link types and status of documents

[Jari Arkko <jari.arkko at piuha.net>]

Right.

Jari

Ian Chakeres kirjoitti:
> I'd like to chime in on this conversation by saying that "MANET link"
> is not a good term. MANET's (and the MANET WG protocols) run over lots
> of kinds of different physical and logical links. It just so happens
> that they may also often run over links with asymmetric reachability.
>
> If a new "link type" needs to be defined, it should not contain the
> term MANET. I see link type as an independent concept.
>
> Ian Chakeres
> _______________________________________________
> Autoconf mailing list
> Autoconf at ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
>
>
>   

_______________________________________________
Autoconf mailing list
Autoconf at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf