Re: [Autoconf] Discussion on link types and status of documents

[Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu at gmail.com>]

Ian Chakeres wrote:
> I'd like to chime in on this conversation by saying that "MANET link"
>  is not a good term. MANET's (and the MANET WG protocols) run over
> lots of kinds of different physical and logical links. It just so
> happens that they may also often run over links with asymmetric
> reachability.

Maybe then trying to describe link-types in the AUTOCONF Architecture is
actually listing those kinds of different physical and logical links on
which MANET have been run?

I have not run MANET.  But I ran other IPv6 protocols, and AUTOCONF is
not limited to MANET, and the list of link-types I used are the following:

Ethernet
Bluetooth
PPP
RS232C
USB

Alex

> 
> If a new "link type" needs to be defined, it should not contain the 
> term MANET. I see link type as an independent concept.
> 
> Ian Chakeres _______________________________________________ Autoconf
> mailing list Autoconf at ietf.org 
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
> 



______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________
Autoconf mailing list
Autoconf at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf