Re: [Autoconf] issues with draft-baccelli address model

["Charles E. Perkins" <charles.perkins at earthlink.net>]

Alexandru Petrescu wrote:
> Charles E. Perkins a écrit :
> > I am fine if the draft discourages LL.  I am fine if the draft does
> > not discourage LL.
> >
> > I only expect that the draft should make it clear that solutions are
> > acceptable if they do not use nor assign link-local addresses.
>
> Are solutions acceptable if they do use LL addresses? (and are 
> guaranteed unique on their respective links.)

Of course!  They may apply only to a restricted subset of the
wireless space of interest, and thus not solve the whole problem,
but why wouldn't they be acceptable for the realm of their
applicability?

Regards,
Charlie P.