Re: [Autoconf] Autoconf Digest, Vol 43, Issue 84

[Hasnaa Moustafa <hasnaa.moustafa at gmail.com>]

I totally agree and I support -->

considering all the candidate documents that are on the table and looking at draft-bernardos at this phase.

 

Kind regards,

Hassnaa

 

 

Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 09:12:46 +0100
From: Carlos Jes?s Bernardos Cano <cjbc at it.uc3m.es>
Subject: Re: [Autoconf] On WG progress
       anddraft-ietf-autoconf-adhoc-addr-model
To: Emmanuel Baccelli <Emmanuel.Baccelli at inria.fr>
Cc: autoconf at ietf.org
Message-ID: <1256803966.4195.21.camel at acorde.it.uc3m.es>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15"

Well, since it seems that the obvious should be said (i.e. authors
supporting their own documents :-) ), I think we should not proceed --
at this stage -- with draft-baccelli, and consider first all the
candidate documents that are on the table (i.e., draft-bernardos, which
is surprisingly more aligned with my opinion).

Thanks,

Carlos